A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Single-level Cervical Disc Operations with Long-term Follow-up: Surgical Fusion Is Unnecessary

A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Single-level Cervical Disc Operations with Long-term... AbstractOBJECTIVE:After 40 years of experience with anterior cervical operations, whether to fuse is still controversial. This study seeks to answer this question.METHODS:In this prospective randomized study, we operated on 91 patients with single-level cervical root compression using three different methods: 1) discectomy without fusion, 2) fusion with autologous bone graft, and 3) fusion with autologous bone graft plus plating.RESULTS:After 4 years of follow-up, the radiological results indicated that complete bony union was achieved in almost all cases. A slight kyphosis developed in 62.5% of the patients who had undergone discectomy, 40% of the patients who had undergone fusion, and 44% of the patients who had undergone fusion plus plating (not significant). The clinical outcomes were good for 76% of the patients who had undergone discectomy, 82% who had undergone fusion, and 73% who had undergone fusion plus plating. The outcomes were poor in 0, 4, and 4%, respectively (not significant).CONCLUSION:According to this study, satisfactory results can be achieved by performing simple discectomy to treat single-level cervical root compressive disease. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Neurosurgery Oxford University Press

A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Single-level Cervical Disc Operations with Long-term Follow-up: Surgical Fusion Is Unnecessary

A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Single-level Cervical Disc Operations with Long-term Follow-up: Surgical Fusion Is Unnecessary

C LIN IC A L STUDIES A Prospective Randomized Study of Anterior Single-level Cervical Disc Operations with Long-term Follow-up: Surgical Fusion Is Unnecessary Sakari Savolainen, M.D., Jaakko Rinne, M.D., Juha Hernesniemi, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland OBJECTIVE: After 40 years of experience with anterior cervical operations, whether to fuse is still controversial. This study seeks to answer this question. METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, we operated on 91 patients with single-level cervical root compression using three different methods: 1) discectomy without fusion, 2) fusion with autologous bone graft, and 3) fusion with autologous bone graft plus plating. RESULTS: After 4 years of follow-up, the radiological results indicated that complete bony union was achieved in almost all cases. A slight kyphosis developed in 62.5% of the patients who had undergone discectomy, 4 0 % of the patients who had undergone fusion, and 4 4 % of the patients who had undergone fusion plus plating (not significant). The clinical outcomes were good for 76 % of the patients who had undergone discectomy, 8 2 % who had undergone fusion, and 7 3 % who had undergone fusion plus plating. The outcomes were poor in 0, 4, and 4 % , respectively (not significant). CO N CLU SIO N : According to this study, satisfactory results can be achieved by performing simple discectomy to treat single-level cervical root compressive disease. (Neurosurgery 43:51-55, 1998) Keywords: Anterior approach, Cervical disc surgery, Cervical spine, Randomized study study w as ap p roved by the Ethics C o m m itte e of the U n iv e r­ espite 40 years of e x p erie n ce w ith anterior cervical sity H ospital of Kuopio. O n ly patients w ith single-level ra d ic­ disc surgery, w h e th e r to su rgically fuse the adjacent ular sy m p to m s and with co rresp o n d in g single-level disease as vertebral b o d ies rem ain s con troversial (1 -3...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/ou_press/a-prospective-randomized-study-of-anterior-single-level-cervical-disc-Utzf9lAL00
Publisher
Congress of Neurological Surgeons
Copyright
© Published by Oxford University Press.
ISSN
0148-396X
eISSN
1524-4040
D.O.I.
10.1097/00006123-199807000-00032
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractOBJECTIVE:After 40 years of experience with anterior cervical operations, whether to fuse is still controversial. This study seeks to answer this question.METHODS:In this prospective randomized study, we operated on 91 patients with single-level cervical root compression using three different methods: 1) discectomy without fusion, 2) fusion with autologous bone graft, and 3) fusion with autologous bone graft plus plating.RESULTS:After 4 years of follow-up, the radiological results indicated that complete bony union was achieved in almost all cases. A slight kyphosis developed in 62.5% of the patients who had undergone discectomy, 40% of the patients who had undergone fusion, and 44% of the patients who had undergone fusion plus plating (not significant). The clinical outcomes were good for 76% of the patients who had undergone discectomy, 82% who had undergone fusion, and 73% who had undergone fusion plus plating. The outcomes were poor in 0, 4, and 4%, respectively (not significant).CONCLUSION:According to this study, satisfactory results can be achieved by performing simple discectomy to treat single-level cervical root compressive disease.

Journal

NeurosurgeryOxford University Press

Published: Jul 1, 1998

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial