Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Making of a Sage: A Study in Rabbinic Ethics (review)

The Making of a Sage: A Study in Rabbinic Ethics (review) Joel S. Kaminsky Hebrew Studies, Volume 48, 2007, pp. 395-397 (Review) Published by National Association of Professors of Hebrew DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2007.0015 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/439507/summary Access provided at 18 Feb 2020 04:32 GMT from JHU Libraries Hebrew Studies 48 (2007) 395 Reviews formly or exceptionally written plene or defective”; Ginsburg, Introduction, p. 774). Three indices appear at the end of the volume including an index of terms from Appendix 1; an index of terms from Appendix 3; and an index of verses cited throughout the volume. One fundamental principle of working with manuscripts such as the Madrid Codex is the need to consult the original manuscript rather than to rely solely on printed editions. One never knows when an error in transcrip- tion might appear or a relevant feature of the original manuscript might be overlooked or omitted. Martín Contreras attempts to overcome this problem by supplying the reader with reproductions of the appendices from the manuscript itself at the end of the volume. Unfortunately, the reproductions are too small to be fully useful, but nevertheless can supply the reader with at least some perspective from the manuscript. Altogether, Martín Contreras has provided readers with an http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Hebrew Studies National Association of Professors of Hebrew

The Making of a Sage: A Study in Rabbinic Ethics (review)

Hebrew Studies , Volume 48 – Oct 5, 2011

Loading next page...
 
/lp/national-association-of-professors-of-hebrew/the-making-of-a-sage-a-study-in-rabbinic-ethics-review-bziCAn50a4
Publisher
National Association of Professors of Hebrew
ISSN
2158-1681

Abstract

Joel S. Kaminsky Hebrew Studies, Volume 48, 2007, pp. 395-397 (Review) Published by National Association of Professors of Hebrew DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2007.0015 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/439507/summary Access provided at 18 Feb 2020 04:32 GMT from JHU Libraries Hebrew Studies 48 (2007) 395 Reviews formly or exceptionally written plene or defective”; Ginsburg, Introduction, p. 774). Three indices appear at the end of the volume including an index of terms from Appendix 1; an index of terms from Appendix 3; and an index of verses cited throughout the volume. One fundamental principle of working with manuscripts such as the Madrid Codex is the need to consult the original manuscript rather than to rely solely on printed editions. One never knows when an error in transcrip- tion might appear or a relevant feature of the original manuscript might be overlooked or omitted. Martín Contreras attempts to overcome this problem by supplying the reader with reproductions of the appendices from the manuscript itself at the end of the volume. Unfortunately, the reproductions are too small to be fully useful, but nevertheless can supply the reader with at least some perspective from the manuscript. Altogether, Martín Contreras has provided readers with an

Journal

Hebrew StudiesNational Association of Professors of Hebrew

Published: Oct 5, 2011

There are no references for this article.