Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Revisiting population size vs. phoneme inventory size

Revisiting population size vs. phoneme inventory size Abstract: In this discussion note we argue against the findings presented in Hay & Bauer 2007, which show a positive correlation between population size and phoneme inventory size. We argue that the positive correlation is an artifact of the authors’ statistical technique and biased data set. Using a hierarchical mixed model to account for genealogical relatedness of languages, and a much larger and more diverse sample of the world’s languages, we find little support for population size as an explanatory predictor of phoneme inventory size once the genealogical relatedness of languages is accounted for. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Language Linguistic Society of America

Revisiting population size vs. phoneme inventory size

Language , Volume 88 (4) – Dec 18, 2012

Loading next page...
 
/lp/linguistic-society-of-america/revisiting-population-size-vs-phoneme-inventory-size-x6PB54X2W8

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Linguistic Society of America
Copyright
Copyright © Linguistic Society of America.
ISSN
1535-0665
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract: In this discussion note we argue against the findings presented in Hay & Bauer 2007, which show a positive correlation between population size and phoneme inventory size. We argue that the positive correlation is an artifact of the authors’ statistical technique and biased data set. Using a hierarchical mixed model to account for genealogical relatedness of languages, and a much larger and more diverse sample of the world’s languages, we find little support for population size as an explanatory predictor of phoneme inventory size once the genealogical relatedness of languages is accounted for.

Journal

LanguageLinguistic Society of America

Published: Dec 18, 2012

There are no references for this article.