Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The semantics of evaluativity by Jessica Rett (review)

The semantics of evaluativity by Jessica Rett (review) REVIEWS 723 ues is its informational content: it offers succinct summaries of each of Chomsky’s five works and of the various evaluations. In addition, it puts forth an insightful view of the evolution of gen- erative linguistics. The importance of the new approach lies in its contributions both to linguistic historiography and to linguistic theory (182–85). From the perspective of historiography, the new approach meets the six general criteria formulated on pp. 105–6. While K’s argument does not pass judgment on any particular version of generative grammar or on the basic approach, it also offers food for thought for practicing linguists in that it reveals the fundamentally uncertain and provisional character of the solutions proposed for problems. The most significant insights of the p-model appear to apply far beyond the pale of linguistic historiography. It bans the notion of exclusivity: of unique and unchanging answers to questions; instead, it argues for pluralism and dynamicity. In this view, the plurality of theories is not a fault but a benefit, and change is not fatal inconsistency but a natural step in the process of theory con- struction. The fundamentally nonabsolutistic, pluralistic approach of the p-model goes a long way toward softening http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Language Linguistic Society of America

The semantics of evaluativity by Jessica Rett (review)

Language , Volume 94 (3) – Sep 12, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/linguistic-society-of-america/i-the-semantics-of-evaluativity-i-by-jessica-rett-review-AmQTXtMXV0
Publisher
Linguistic Society of America
Copyright
Copyright © Linguistic Society of America.
ISSN
1535-0665

Abstract

REVIEWS 723 ues is its informational content: it offers succinct summaries of each of Chomsky’s five works and of the various evaluations. In addition, it puts forth an insightful view of the evolution of gen- erative linguistics. The importance of the new approach lies in its contributions both to linguistic historiography and to linguistic theory (182–85). From the perspective of historiography, the new approach meets the six general criteria formulated on pp. 105–6. While K’s argument does not pass judgment on any particular version of generative grammar or on the basic approach, it also offers food for thought for practicing linguists in that it reveals the fundamentally uncertain and provisional character of the solutions proposed for problems. The most significant insights of the p-model appear to apply far beyond the pale of linguistic historiography. It bans the notion of exclusivity: of unique and unchanging answers to questions; instead, it argues for pluralism and dynamicity. In this view, the plurality of theories is not a fault but a benefit, and change is not fatal inconsistency but a natural step in the process of theory con- struction. The fundamentally nonabsolutistic, pluralistic approach of the p-model goes a long way toward softening

Journal

LanguageLinguistic Society of America

Published: Sep 12, 2018

There are no references for this article.