Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
The EEAS Review leaves plenty of questions open, not the least of which are what it implies for organizational changes, modifications to legal texts, budgets and personnel. The review makes it clear that there are a number of reasonably straight forward adaptations that can be made within the Service. These 'quick wins' are necessary to help the EEAS move beyond its difficult birth and to boost morale. Those recommendations that require more extensive reform and adaptation have yet to be faced, but at least the review makes it clear that there are limits to what can be accomplished by internal reorganization. The review marks the end of transitional phase and it is now up to the EU institutions and the Member States to respond and, in so doing, to decide what kind of Service they want.
European Foreign Affairs Review – Kluwer Law International
Published: Feb 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.