Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Free trade and investment are deemed to be beneficial and so are, in terms of content, free trade and investment agreements. In Asia the number of these agreements is growing. The article explains how free trade and investment agreements in Asia are supposed to work, but why effectively they do not, namely because their sheer number misses the market and having to plough through them causes a waste of resources and opportunities. The article concludes with suggesting the lengthy and arduous but worthwhile effort necessary in order to revert to the underlying idea of every free trade and investment agreement.
Global Trade and Customs Journal – Kluwer Law International
Published: Jul 1, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.