Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

One- or Two-tier Board System? A Comparative Analysis of the British and Polish Systems of Corporate Governance

One- or Two-tier Board System? A Comparative Analysis of the British and Polish Systems of... Corporate literature and practice reveal that neither the British one-tier nor the Polish two-tier board system is entirely safe for business participants. This article considers the implementation of a one-tier board system in Poland to be an alternative to the currently binding one, in addition to increasing the number of independent supervisors on supervisory boards. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Company Law Kluwer Law International

One- or Two-tier Board System? A Comparative Analysis of the British and Polish Systems of Corporate Governance

European Company Law , Volume 13 (2) – Apr 1, 2016

One- or Two-tier Board System? A Comparative Analysis of the British and Polish Systems of Corporate Governance


ARTICLE KATARZYNA S A M Ó L * INTRODUCTION of shareholders exceeds twenty-five.5 In the event that the board has not been established, the articles of association6 empower shareholders to, at any time, inspect the books and documents of the company, prepare a balance sheet for their personal use or request that the management board provide explanations.7 The CCPC 2000 does not give such a right to the shareholders of a joint-stock company (JSC). In the UK, companies adhere to the one-tier (`unitary') board model. In practice, this means that a company is governed by a management board alone, which is composed of executive and non-executive directors. The distinction between executive and non-executive directors has no significance in company law (although it may create problems in employment law).8 An executive director of a company typically devotes his or her working time to the company (or a number of companies in a group), often as an employee of the company, and has a significant personal interest in the company as a source of income. A nonexecutive director of a company typically does not devote his or her entire working time to the company and receives a relatively small director's fee. He or she still has unlimited access to the company's files and can participate in the decision-making process on the same basis as the executive members of the board.9 The Codification Commission discussed the possible implementation of the one-tier model of corporate governance in The internal structure of a Polish joint-stock company (the equivalent of a British public limited company (PLC) or a German Aktiengesellschaft (AG))1 is traditionally based on the two-tier (`dual') board system of German origin with two obligatory boards ­ a management board and a supervisory board. The supervisory board supervises the management board and oversees the company's financial statements, it also reports to the shareholders on the activities of...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/kluwer-law-international/one-or-two-tier-board-system-a-comparative-analysis-of-the-british-and-0Jjn9dh125

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Kluwer Law International
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer Law International
ISSN
1572-4999
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Corporate literature and practice reveal that neither the British one-tier nor the Polish two-tier board system is entirely safe for business participants. This article considers the implementation of a one-tier board system in Poland to be an alternative to the currently binding one, in addition to increasing the number of independent supervisors on supervisory boards.

Journal

European Company LawKluwer Law International

Published: Apr 1, 2016

There are no references for this article.