Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Abstract. With the partial exception of the Western Balkans, further expansion of the Euro-Atlantic community in the form of enlargement of the European Union (EU) and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is not presently attainable for, or desired by, the countries lying beyond the eastern and south-eastern borders of the two organizations. This article argues that this state of affairs has resulted in a gaping institutional divergence about the wider European constellation as seen from the United States and its European partners – especially the EU as a foreign-policy actor. At the same time, this article makes the case that norm-driven arguments – understood as the values, rules, and standards being promoted in the European neighbourhood – continue to underpin discursive practices of, and prospects for, transatlantic convergence in this diverse region. The case study of NATO-EU crisis management coordination in the European neighbourhood illustrates this claim.
European Foreign Affairs Review – Kluwer Law International
Published: Aug 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.