Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Case Law

Case Law and were specific to, and essential for, the exempt transactions. In this regard, a service exempt under the directive had to be distinguished from a mere physical or technical supply, such as making a data-handling 5 June 1997, C-2/95, Sparekassernes system available to a bank. The ECJ held that it was for Datacenter (SBC) (BK) the national court to examine in particular the question whether the responsibility of SDC was VAT - Art. 13B(d), points 3 to 5 of the Sixth Directive restricted to technical aspects or whether it extended h e m p t transactions to the specific, essential aspects of the transactions. The Court also decided that services consisting in SDC was set up as a data-handling centre, to serve the making financial information available to banks and common interests of its members. Most of its members other users were not covered by points 3 and 5 of Art. were savings banks. It provided services to its 13B(d). Furthermore, the Court observed that, as far members and to other banks relating to transfers, as the management of deposits, purchase contracts advice on and trade in securities, and the management and loans was concerned, such operations were http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png EC Tax Review Kluwer Law International

Case Law

Vandenberghe; Delattre; Berlin; Chaulin; Valente; Magenta; Weber; Elliott
EC Tax Review , Volume 6 (4) – Jan 21, 1997
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/kluwer-law-international/case-law-cZCJyVcOcn
Publisher
Kluwer Law International
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer Law International
ISSN
0928-2750
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

and were specific to, and essential for, the exempt transactions. In this regard, a service exempt under the directive had to be distinguished from a mere physical or technical supply, such as making a data-handling 5 June 1997, C-2/95, Sparekassernes system available to a bank. The ECJ held that it was for Datacenter (SBC) (BK) the national court to examine in particular the question whether the responsibility of SDC was VAT - Art. 13B(d), points 3 to 5 of the Sixth Directive restricted to technical aspects or whether it extended h e m p t transactions to the specific, essential aspects of the transactions. The Court also decided that services consisting in SDC was set up as a data-handling centre, to serve the making financial information available to banks and common interests of its members. Most of its members other users were not covered by points 3 and 5 of Art. were savings banks. It provided services to its 13B(d). Furthermore, the Court observed that, as far members and to other banks relating to transfers, as the management of deposits, purchase contracts advice on and trade in securities, and the management and loans was concerned, such operations were

Journal

EC Tax Review – Kluwer Law International

Published: Jan 21, 1997

There are no references for this article.