Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Arbitrations involving Brazilian State Entities still give rise to a fertile field to academic research, so that the present essay intends to examine issues that arise when concretely applying objective arbitrability criteria to assess whether a determined act practiced by a State Entity can or cannot be judged in arbitration. In order to achieve that purpose, the adoption of the dichotomy between acta jure gestionis and acta jure imperii as the criterion to assess objective arbitrability is justified. Based on that, the State prerogatives set forth in art. 104 of Act no. 14.133/2021 are individually examined, as well as their respective provisions in Act no. 13.303/2016, concluding whether each one of them fulfills or not the requirements of objective arbitrability. The analysis encompasses not only legal scholars’ books and essays, but also relevant Brazilian case law on the issue. Finally, the conclusions recall the current status of the Brazilian law on objective arbitrability regarding conflicts involving State Entities and addresses some comments de lege ferenda.
Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem – Kluwer Law International
Published: Dec 1, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.