Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Zur Psycho(patho)dynamik suizidalen Verhaltens in Kindheit beginnender Pubertät

Zur Psycho(patho)dynamik suizidalen Verhaltens in Kindheit beginnender Pubertät The oversimplifying and scientifically untenable separation of suicide (successful) and attempted suicide (unsuccessful) was overcome by Stengel’s, fundamental findings that only very few attempted suicides are failed suicides, and that the majority of attempted suicides are acts of a qualitatively distinct character. Psycho(patho)dynamic analyses of suicidal acts disclosed that in a portion of the suicide attempts there is no or at least no determined suicidal intent. The definition of ‘suicidal attempt’ which has come into general use is therefore imprecise, because in many cases suicide is not “attempted” but the technique of suicidal behaviour is only used for a primary non-suicidal purpose. A differential typology of the entire content of the concept of ‘suicide attempt’ which includes vague non-homogeneous matters has become unavoidable and is being discussed here. In the suicidal behaviour of children the problems become even clearer. The ‘suicide attempt’ in children does not meet Stengel’s criteria. The great majority of cases are not ‘attempted’ suicides, do not show a final determination, do not come about in a calculated manner, and are not based on an ambivalence about life and death, but are rather a potentially fatal substitution by suicidal behaviour for a demonstrative appeal for help, for a resigned escape signal or for an impulsive cry. Neither can one recognize the development of the pre-suicidal syndrome described by Ringel. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychopathology Karger

Zur Psycho(patho)dynamik suizidalen Verhaltens in Kindheit beginnender Pubertät

Psychopathology , Volume 13 (2): 12 – Jan 1, 1980

Loading next page...
 
/lp/karger/zur-psycho-patho-dynamik-suizidalen-verhaltens-in-kindheit-beginnender-0X0pvINmSV

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Karger
Copyright
© 1980 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN
0254-4962
eISSN
1423-033X
DOI
10.1159/000283865
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The oversimplifying and scientifically untenable separation of suicide (successful) and attempted suicide (unsuccessful) was overcome by Stengel’s, fundamental findings that only very few attempted suicides are failed suicides, and that the majority of attempted suicides are acts of a qualitatively distinct character. Psycho(patho)dynamic analyses of suicidal acts disclosed that in a portion of the suicide attempts there is no or at least no determined suicidal intent. The definition of ‘suicidal attempt’ which has come into general use is therefore imprecise, because in many cases suicide is not “attempted” but the technique of suicidal behaviour is only used for a primary non-suicidal purpose. A differential typology of the entire content of the concept of ‘suicide attempt’ which includes vague non-homogeneous matters has become unavoidable and is being discussed here. In the suicidal behaviour of children the problems become even clearer. The ‘suicide attempt’ in children does not meet Stengel’s criteria. The great majority of cases are not ‘attempted’ suicides, do not show a final determination, do not come about in a calculated manner, and are not based on an ambivalence about life and death, but are rather a potentially fatal substitution by suicidal behaviour for a demonstrative appeal for help, for a resigned escape signal or for an impulsive cry. Neither can one recognize the development of the pre-suicidal syndrome described by Ringel.

Journal

PsychopathologyKarger

Published: Jan 1, 1980

There are no references for this article.