Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This article briefly explores the underlying analogy between culture and language common in American anthropology and related fields. Certain key assumptions about culture – among them systematicity, homogeneity, sharedness, and boundedness – derive in part from this analogy. Three points are central: first, that these operating assumptions are interpretively and rhetorically powerful but can lead to particularly static models; second, that these are not necessarily inherent features of language itself, i.e., that the language end of the analogy may be misunderstood; and, third, that the use of a case approach, one tracking the making and transformation of cultural practice over time, can help us better account for the complex relationships among culture, social life, and socialization.
Human Development – Karger
Published: Aug 1, 2002
Keywords: Methodology; Language; Case studies; Culture
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.