Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Editorial © 1987 S .K a rg e r A G . Basel Nephron 45: 257 263 (1987) 0028 2 7 6 6 /8 7 /0 4 5 4 0257S 2.75/0 C M . KjeUstrand'c, George M. Loganh “University of M innesota Medical School and '’Hennepin County Medical Center, M inneapolis, Minn., USA, and “Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden It is common dency that nobody should suffer want of Measures of Distribution and Injustice medical care. A humane society tries to achieve distribu tive justice o f common welfare goods [1]. Some expensive In our attem pt to analyze discrimination in chronic dialysis, we will introduce two new concepts for the measure o f distributive high-technology medical care, such as renal dialysis and justice in medicine: percentage or fraction dialyzed: and the discri transplantation, is paid for by all through taxes. If people m ination index. need treatm ent and are excluded from it, they are finan The num ber o f patients treated was obtained from governmental cially cheated, and much worse, they will die and a dialysis statistics [6]. Once the number of patients treated is known, this will serve as the num erator, and the patients at
Nephron – Karger
Published: Jan 1, 1987
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.