Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Neuroscience, Genetics, and the Future of Psychiatric Diagnosis

Neuroscience, Genetics, and the Future of Psychiatric Diagnosis Nearly three decades after Robins and Guze’s seminal delineation of the steps required to validate a psychiatric diagnosis, a pathophysiologically based classification of psychiatric disorders remains elusive. Contrary to optimistic expectations, approaches to diagnostic validity based on clinical description, laboratory studies, natural history of illness, and familial aggregation have not converged to yield a nosology based on valid disease entities. Defining a rational nosology for disorders of the brain, the body’s most complex organ, is clearly one of the great challenges for modern medical science. Nonetheless, fundamental advances in our understanding of the genetic and environmental determinants of disease risk, and of the neural circuitry supporting normal and pathological mental processes promises to form the basis of improved classification in the coming decades. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychopathology Karger

Neuroscience, Genetics, and the Future of Psychiatric Diagnosis

Psychopathology , Volume 35 (2-3): 6 – Jun 1, 2002

Loading next page...
 
/lp/karger/neuroscience-genetics-and-the-future-of-psychiatric-diagnosis-EqDg0DW8qL

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Karger
Copyright
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN
0254-4962
eISSN
1423-033X
DOI
10.1159/000065134
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Nearly three decades after Robins and Guze’s seminal delineation of the steps required to validate a psychiatric diagnosis, a pathophysiologically based classification of psychiatric disorders remains elusive. Contrary to optimistic expectations, approaches to diagnostic validity based on clinical description, laboratory studies, natural history of illness, and familial aggregation have not converged to yield a nosology based on valid disease entities. Defining a rational nosology for disorders of the brain, the body’s most complex organ, is clearly one of the great challenges for modern medical science. Nonetheless, fundamental advances in our understanding of the genetic and environmental determinants of disease risk, and of the neural circuitry supporting normal and pathological mental processes promises to form the basis of improved classification in the coming decades.

Journal

PsychopathologyKarger

Published: Jun 1, 2002

Keywords: Neuroscience; Genetics; Psychiatric diagnoses

There are no references for this article.