Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/karger/comments-on-reason-for-conflicting-results-of-venography-mCGgpHg3Fv
References
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
- Publisher
- Karger
- Copyright
- © 1993 S. Karger AG, Basel
- ISSN
- 1424-8832
- eISSN
- 1424-8840
- DOI
- 10.1159/000216914
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Conflicting results of phlebography in the diagnosis of thrombosis in different investigations are discussed. The following factors may explain different results: phlebography is a subjective method, not based on measurable parameters; insufficient phlebographic technique may result in unsafe diagnosis; the selection of patient material may vary in different investigations; variations in thrombosis incidence may vary with the age of the patient and with the season; the incidence of thrombosis varies within the postoperative period.
Journal
Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis – Karger
Published: Jan 1, 1993
Keywords: Phlebography; Thrombosis