Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Natural Evolution versus Medical Treatment

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Natural Evolution versus Medical Treatment The epidemiology and natural evolution of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) are important when considering the topic of natural evolution versusmedical treatment. The incidence of BPH increases with age; it is thought thatabout 75% of men over 50 years of age suffer from some symptoms commonlyassociated with BPH. There are also differences in the incidence of BPHbetween various racial and ethnic groups. For example, it is considerably lesscommon amongst Japanese men compared with Caucasians. Evidence fromprospective studies, retrospective studies and the placebo arms of randomised,controlled studies regarding the natural evolution of BPH suggests that astrategy of ‘watchful waiting’ may be considered as a treatment option as themajority of patients do not show a worsening of symptoms over time. However,the chance for improvement of symptoms and the degree of symptomimprovement has been shown to be higher with ai-blocker therapy than with‘watchful waiting’. As both symptoms and treatment have an impact on thepatient’s quality of life, there is now a strong case for involving the patient in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Urology Karger

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Natural Evolution versus Medical Treatment

European Urology , Volume 32 (Suppl 2): 4 – Jan 1, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/karger/benign-prostatic-hyperplasia-natural-evolution-versus-medical-FrREvpvDtj

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Karger
Copyright
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
ISSN
0302-2838
eISSN
1873-7560
DOI
10.1159/000480775
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The epidemiology and natural evolution of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) are important when considering the topic of natural evolution versusmedical treatment. The incidence of BPH increases with age; it is thought thatabout 75% of men over 50 years of age suffer from some symptoms commonlyassociated with BPH. There are also differences in the incidence of BPHbetween various racial and ethnic groups. For example, it is considerably lesscommon amongst Japanese men compared with Caucasians. Evidence fromprospective studies, retrospective studies and the placebo arms of randomised,controlled studies regarding the natural evolution of BPH suggests that astrategy of ‘watchful waiting’ may be considered as a treatment option as themajority of patients do not show a worsening of symptoms over time. However,the chance for improvement of symptoms and the degree of symptomimprovement has been shown to be higher with ai-blocker therapy than with‘watchful waiting’. As both symptoms and treatment have an impact on thepatient’s quality of life, there is now a strong case for involving the patient in

Journal

European UrologyKarger

Published: Jan 1, 2019

Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia; α(1)-blockers; Quality of life; Epidemiology

There are no references for this article.