Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
The concept of climate change as a security threat is not new, and the idea of using the UN Security Council to combat this threat has long since been mooted by academic scholars. Yet in recent years a growing sense of urgency has led to an increased tendency to view the prospect in substantive terms. Despite the growing literature on the topic, however, the question of what measures would be open to and feasible for the Security Council to take were it to seek to engage in the climate change problematique remains underexplored. This paper seeks to begin to address this gap by analysing the core legal and practical issues surrounding the potential for Council action in three key areas: the creation of climate mitigation obligations; the avoidance of existing commitments which risk posing a “regulatory chill” on climate measures; and the enforcement of conventional commitments. In this way, it aims to facilitate a more nuanced understanding of the Council's potential role in this area which can be applied to a variety of eventualities and as a variably proportioned element of the broader international framework.
Climate Law – IOS Press
Published: Jan 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.