Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Matthew Young, Justin Bullock, J. Lecy (2019)
Artificial Discretion as a Tool of Governance: A Framework for Understanding the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Public AdministrationPerspectives on Public Management and Governance
G. Eijk (2020)
Algorithmic reasoning
Robert Werth (2016)
Individualizing Risk: Moral Judgement, Professional Knowledge and Affect in Parole EvaluationsBritish Journal of Criminology, 57
D. Moynihan, Stéphane Lavertu (2012)
Cognitive Biases in Governing: Technology Preferences in Election AdministrationPublic Administration Review, 72
Colin Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, Austin Toombs (2018)
The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX DesignProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Kelly Hannah-Moffat (2016)
A conceptual kaleidoscope: contemplating ‘dynamic structural risk’ and an uncoupling of risk from needPsychology, Crime & Law, 22
Melissa Hamilton (2014)
Adventures in Risk: Predicting Violent and Sexual Recidivism in Sentencing Law
G. Eijk (2017)
Socioeconomic marginality in sentencing: The built-in bias in risk assessment tools and the reproduction of social inequalityPunishment & Society, 19
M. Janssen, J. Hoven (2015)
Big and Open Linked Data (BOLD) in government: A challenge to transparency and privacy?Gov. Inf. Q., 32
M. Akrich, B. Latour (1992)
A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies
J. Monahan, Jennifer Skeem (2016)
Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing.Annual review of clinical psychology, 12
P. Busch, H. Henriksen (2018)
Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretionInf. Polity, 23
B. Mittelstadt, P. Allo, M. Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, L. Floridi (2016)
The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debateBig Data & Society, 3
L. Tummers, V. Bekkers, E. Vink, Michael Musheno (2015)
Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the LiteraturePolitical Behavior: Cognition
H. Ekbia, Michael Mattioli, Inna Kouper, G. Arave, Ali Ghazinejad, T. Bowman, V. Suri, Andrew Tsou, Scott Weingart, Cassidy Sugimoto (2015)
Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical reviewJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66
Sharad Goel, Justin Rao, Ravi Shroff (2016)
Personalized risk assessments in the criminal justice systemThe American Economic Review, 106
Kelly Hannah-Moffat (2013)
Actuarial Sentencing: An “Unsettled” PropositionJustice Quarterly, 30
Zeynep Engin, P. Treleaven (2019)
Algorithmic Government: Automating Public Services and Supporting Civil Servants in using Data Science TechnologiesComput. J., 62
N. Couldry, U. Mejías (2018)
Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary SubjectTelevision & New Media, 20
Harry Brignull, Y. Rogers (2003)
Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces
L. Bainbridge (1982)
Ironies of automationAutom., 19
E. Silver (2000)
Actuarial risk assessment: Reflections on an emerging social-scientific toolCritical Criminology, 9
John Howard, Laura Rabbitt, Yevgeniy Sirotin (2020)
Human-algorithm teaming in face recognition: How algorithm outcomes cognitively bias human decision-makingPLoS ONE, 15
J. Reidenberg, J. Reidenberg, D. Robinson, Harlan YUt (2016)
Accountable Algorithms
J. Dijck, T. Poell (2016)
Understanding the promises and premises of online health platformsBig Data & Society, 3
Lyria Moses, Janet Chan (2016)
Algorithmic prediction in policing: assumptions, evaluation, and accountabilityPolicing and Society, 28
S. Goldfinch (2007)
Pessimism, Computer Failure, and Information Systems Development in the Public SectorPublic Administration Review, 67
Claudia Aradau, Tobias Blanke (2017)
Governing others: Anomaly and the algorithmic subject of securityEuropean Journal of International Security, 3
M. Moon, E. Welch (2004)
Same Bed, Different Dreams? A Comparative Analysis of Citizen and Bureaucrat Perspectives on E-GovernmentReview of Public Personnel Administration, 25
Hendrik Scholta, Willem Mertens, A. Reeve, M. Kowalkiewicz (2019)
From One-stop-shop to no-stop-shop: an E-Government stage ModelGov. Inf. Q., 36
M. Eale (2017)
SLAVE TO THE ALGORITHM ? WHY A ‘ RIGHT TO AN EXPLANATION ’ IS PROBABLY NOT THE REMEDY YOU ARE LOOKING FOR
A. Sueur (2015)
Robot Government: Automated Decision-Making and its Implications for Parliament
Matilde Høybye-Mortensen (2015)
Decision-Making Tools and Their Influence on Caseworkers' Room for DiscretionBritish Journal of Social Work, 45
A. Cordella, Niccoló Tempini (2015)
E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service deliveryGov. Inf. Q., 32
Tal Zarsky (2011)
Governmental Data Mining and its AlternativesLaw & Politics eJournal
Kelly Hannah-Moffat, Paula Maurutto, Sarah Turnbull (2009)
Negotiated Risk: Actuarial Illusions and Discretion in ProbationCanadian journal of law and society, 24
Bettina Berendt, Sören Preibusch (2017)
Toward Accountable Discrimination-Aware Data Mining: The Importance of Keeping the Human in the Loop - and Under the Looking GlassBig data, 5 2
L. Winner (2017)
Do Artifacts Have Politics?Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance
Todd Porte, C. Demchak, M. Jong (2002)
Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the WebAdministration & Society, 34
Kimberly Houser, D. Sanders (2017)
The Use of Big Data Analytics by the IRS: Efficient Solution or the End of Privacy as We Know it?
Rik Peeters, M. Schuilenburg (2018)
Machine justice: Governing security through the bureaucracy of algorithmsInf. Polity, 23
K. Pazouki, N. Forbes, R. Norman, M. Woodward (2018)
Investigation on the impact of human-automation interaction in maritime operationsOcean Engineering, 153
Emily Keddell (2019)
Algorithmic Justice in Child Protection: Statistical Fairness, Social Justice and the Implications for PracticeSocial Sciences
M. O’Keeffe, A. Traeger, T. Hoffmann, G. Ferreira, J. Soon, C. Maher (2019)
Can nudge-interventions address health service overuse and underuse? Protocol for a systematic reviewBMJ Open, 9
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1979)
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
Gavin Smith, P. O’Malley (2016)
Driving Politics: Data-driven Governance and ResistanceBritish Journal of Criminology, 57
Ric Simmons (2018)
Big Data, Machine Judges, and the Legitimacy of the Criminal Justice System
Lucas Introna, David Wood (2002)
Picturing Algorithmic Surveillance: The Politics of Facial Recognition SystemsSurveillance & Society, 2
Fred Davis (1989)
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information TechnologyMIS Q., 13
M. Bovens, S. Zouridis (2002)
From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional ControlPublic Administration Review, 62
M. Elish (2019)
Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot InteractionEngaging Science, Technology, and Society
J. Danaher (2016)
The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and AccommodationPhilosophy & Technology, 29
Justin Bullock (2019)
Artificial Intelligence, Discretion, and BureaucracyThe American Review of Public Administration, 49
K. Yeung (2017)
Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical InterrogationRegulation of Financial Institutions eJournal
J. Burrell (2016)
How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithmsBig Data & Society, 3
Monika Zalnieriute, L. Moses, G. Williams (2019)
The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision‐MakingWiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review
V. Ostrom (1996)
Faustian bargainsConstitutional Political Economy, 7
Kelly Hannah-Moffat (2019)
Algorithmic risk governance: Big data analytics, race and information activism in criminal justice debatesTheoretical Criminology, 23
P. Gillingham (2015)
Predictive Risk Modelling to Prevent Child Maltreatment and Other Adverse Outcomes for Service Users: Inside the ‘Black Box’ of Machine LearningBritish Journal of Social Work, 46
Shoshana Zuboff (2015)
Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilizationJournal of Information Technology, 30
B. Strauch (2018)
Ironies of Automation: Still Unresolved After All These YearsIEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48
S. Ranchordás (2019)
Nudging citizens through technology in smart citiesInternational Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 34
Victoria Banks, K. Plant, N. Stanton (2017)
Driver error or designer error: Using the Perceptual Cycle Model to explore the circumstances surrounding the fatal Tesla crash on 7th May 2016Safety Science
D. Citron, Frank Pasquale (2014)
[89WashLRev0001] The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions
John Zerilli, A. Knott, J. MacLaurin, C. Gavaghan (2019)
Algorithmic Decision-Making and the Control ProblemMinds and Machines, 29
Tobias Matzner (2017)
Opening Black Boxes Is Not Enough – Data-based Surveillance In Discipline and Punish And TodayFoucault Studies
Arjan Widlak, Rik Peeters (2020)
Administrative Errors and the Burden of Correction and Consequence: How Information Technology Exacerbates the Consequences of Bureaucratic Mistakes for CitizensInternational Journal of Electronic Governance
Gavin Smith, L. Moses, Janet Chan (2017)
The Challenges of Doing Criminology in the Big Data Era: Towards a Digital and Data-driven ApproachBritish Journal of Criminology, 57
Patrick Dunleavy, H. Margetts, Simon Bastow, J. Tinkler (2005)
New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governanceJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16
D. Landsbergen (2004)
Screen level bureaucracy: Databases as public recordsGov. Inf. Q., 21
Eric Greenlee, P. Delucia, David Newton (2018)
Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of TimeHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 60
J. Ponce (2005)
Good Administration and Administrative ProceduresIndiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 12
Rik Peeters, Arjan Widlak (2018)
The digital cage: Administrative exclusion through information architecture - The case of the Dutch civil registry's master data management systemGov. Inf. Q., 35
Reuben Binns (2017)
Algorithmic Accountability and Public ReasonPhilosophy & Technology, 31
With the rise of computer algorithms in administrative decision-making, concerns are voiced about their lack of transparency and discretionary space for human decision-makers. However, calls to ‘keep humans in the loop’ may be moot points if we fail to understand how algorithms impact human decision-making and how algorithmic design impacts the practical possibilities for transparency and human discretion. Through a review of recent academic literature, three algorithmic design variables that determine the preconditions for human transparency and discretion and four main sources of variation in ‘human-algorithm interaction’ are identified. The article makes two contributions. First, the existing evidence is analysed and organized to demonstrate that, by working upon behavioural mechanisms of decision-making, the agency of algorithms extends beyond their computer code and can profoundly impact human behaviour and decision-making. Second, a research agenda for studying how computer algorithms affect administrative decision-making is proposed.
Information Polity – IOS Press
Published: Dec 4, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.