Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Roundtable: The Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea — Implications and Regional Responses

Roundtable: The Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea — Implications and Regional... Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 38, No. 3 (2016), pp. 337–88 DOI: 10.1355/cs38-3a © 2016 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute ISSN 0129-797X print / ISSN 1793-284X electronic Roundtable: The Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea — Implications and Regional Responses Three and a half years after the Philippines took the unprecedented step of challenging the legal basis of China’s expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea, the Arbitral Tribunal established under compulsory dispute resolution provisions contained in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and based at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, issued its final ruling on 12 July 2016. The award was far more comprehensive and decisive than many legal experts had predicted: the Philippines won 14 of the 15 disputes under consideration. The Tribunal was not mandated to adjudicate on the sovereignty of hundreds of geographical features which make up the Spratly archipelago, but instead focused on maritime rights and entitlements in the South China Sea. The judges issued four major decisions. First, China’s “historic rights” claim to living and non-living resources within the nine-dash line that appears on Chinese maps of the South China Sea is http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs Institute of Southeast Asian Studies

Roundtable: The Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea — Implications and Regional Responses

Roundtable: The Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea — Implications and Regional Responses


Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 38, No. 3 (2016), pp. 337–88 DOI: 10.1355/cs38-3a © 2016 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute ISSN 0129-797X print / ISSN 1793-284X electronic Roundtable: The Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea — Implications and Regional Responses Three and a half years after the Philippines took the unprecedented step of challenging the legal basis of China’s expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea, the Arbitral Tribunal established under compulsory dispute resolution provisions contained in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and based at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, issued its final ruling on 12 July 2016. The award was far more comprehensive and decisive than many legal experts had predicted: the Philippines won 14 of the 15 disputes under consideration. The Tribunal was not mandated to adjudicate on the sovereignty of hundreds of geographical features which make up the Spratly archipelago, but instead focused on maritime rights and entitlements in the South China Sea. The judges issued four major decisions. First, China’s “historic rights” claim to living and non-living resources within the nine-dash line that appears on Chinese maps of the South China Sea is incompatible with UNCLOS. Second, that none of the Spratly features are islands entitled to a 200 nautical mile (nm) exclusive economic zone (EEZ); they are either rocks, entitled only to a 12 nm territorial sea, or low-tide elevations with no associated maritime zones. Third, that Beijing had violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights in its EEZ by harassing fishing boats and survey vessels, and by undertaking massive reclamation work at several Chinese-occupied features determined to be within the EEZ of the Philippines. Fourth, that...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/institute-of-southeast-asian-studies/roundtable-the-arbitral-tribunal-s-ruling-on-the-south-china-sea-zxjMgG0EN0
Publisher
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
Copyright
Copyright © The Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
ISSN
1793-284X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 38, No. 3 (2016), pp. 337–88 DOI: 10.1355/cs38-3a © 2016 ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute ISSN 0129-797X print / ISSN 1793-284X electronic Roundtable: The Arbitral Tribunal’s Ruling on the South China Sea — Implications and Regional Responses Three and a half years after the Philippines took the unprecedented step of challenging the legal basis of China’s expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea, the Arbitral Tribunal established under compulsory dispute resolution provisions contained in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), and based at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, issued its final ruling on 12 July 2016. The award was far more comprehensive and decisive than many legal experts had predicted: the Philippines won 14 of the 15 disputes under consideration. The Tribunal was not mandated to adjudicate on the sovereignty of hundreds of geographical features which make up the Spratly archipelago, but instead focused on maritime rights and entitlements in the South China Sea. The judges issued four major decisions. First, China’s “historic rights” claim to living and non-living resources within the nine-dash line that appears on Chinese maps of the South China Sea is

Journal

Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic AffairsInstitute of Southeast Asian Studies

Published: Feb 4, 2016

There are no references for this article.