Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context Edited by Miles Kahler and Andrew McIntyre (review)

Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context Edited by Miles Kahler and Andrew McIntyre (review) Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 35, No. 3 (2013), pp. 450–52 DOI: 10.1355/cs35-3g © 2013 ISEAS ISSN 0129-797X print / ISSN 1793-284X electronic Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context. Edited by Miles Kahler and Andrew McIntyre. Stanford University Press, 2013. Hardcover: 320pp. This volume is an important addition to a small but growing literature on comparative forms of regionalism. The principal focus here is Asia — primarily East Asia — but its distinctive features are thrown into sharp relief by contrasting them with the experiences of Latin American and Europe. Not all the chapters adopt an explicitly comparative framework. However, even the chapters that are not comparative, help to put the East Asian experience in a larger historical and geographical context. Given the impressive line-up of contributors, the book as a whole marks an important contribution to our understanding of East Asia in particular and regional dynamics more generally. In addition to providing an introduction, Miles Kahler makes the important point that economics and security in East Asia have run on “distinct tracks” (p. 17). This is an under-appreciated aspect of East Asian institutionalization and provides a useful backdrop for Simon Hix’s discussion of institutional design. Hix provides some http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs Institute of Southeast Asian Studies

Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context Edited by Miles Kahler and Andrew McIntyre (review)

Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context Edited by Miles Kahler and Andrew McIntyre (review)


Abstract

Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 35, No. 3 (2013), pp. 450–52 DOI: 10.1355/cs35-3g © 2013 ISEAS ISSN 0129-797X print / ISSN 1793-284X electronic Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context. Edited by Miles Kahler and Andrew McIntyre. Stanford University Press, 2013. Hardcover: 320pp. This volume is an important addition to a small but growing literature on comparative forms of regionalism. The principal focus here is Asia — primarily East Asia — but its distinctive features are thrown into sharp relief by contrasting them with the experiences of Latin American and Europe. Not all the chapters adopt an explicitly comparative framework. However, even the chapters that are not comparative, help to put the East Asian experience in a larger historical and geographical context. Given the impressive line-up of contributors, the book as a whole marks an important contribution to our understanding of East Asia in particular and regional dynamics more generally. In addition to providing an introduction, Miles Kahler makes the important point that economics and security in East Asia have run on “distinct tracks” (p. 17). This is an under-appreciated aspect of East Asian institutionalization and provides a useful backdrop for Simon Hix’s discussion of institutional design. Hix provides some

Loading next page...
 
/lp/institute-of-southeast-asian-studies/integrating-regions-asia-in-comparative-context-edited-by-miles-kahler-F0Mlj6xm0I
Publisher
Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
Copyright
Copyright © The Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
ISSN
1793-284X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 35, No. 3 (2013), pp. 450–52 DOI: 10.1355/cs35-3g © 2013 ISEAS ISSN 0129-797X print / ISSN 1793-284X electronic Integrating Regions: Asia in Comparative Context. Edited by Miles Kahler and Andrew McIntyre. Stanford University Press, 2013. Hardcover: 320pp. This volume is an important addition to a small but growing literature on comparative forms of regionalism. The principal focus here is Asia — primarily East Asia — but its distinctive features are thrown into sharp relief by contrasting them with the experiences of Latin American and Europe. Not all the chapters adopt an explicitly comparative framework. However, even the chapters that are not comparative, help to put the East Asian experience in a larger historical and geographical context. Given the impressive line-up of contributors, the book as a whole marks an important contribution to our understanding of East Asia in particular and regional dynamics more generally. In addition to providing an introduction, Miles Kahler makes the important point that economics and security in East Asia have run on “distinct tracks” (p. 17). This is an under-appreciated aspect of East Asian institutionalization and provides a useful backdrop for Simon Hix’s discussion of institutional design. Hix provides some

Journal

Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic AffairsInstitute of Southeast Asian Studies

Published: Dec 13, 2013

There are no references for this article.