Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Watkins, M. Bazerman (2003)
Predictable surprises: the disasters you should have seen coming.Harvard business review, 81 3
A. Edmondson (1999)
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work TeamsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 44
Giovanni Gavetti, Daniel Levinthal (2000)
Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential SearchAdministrative Science Quarterly, 45
Dorothy Leonard-Barton (1992)
Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development: Strategic Management Journal, 13, 111–125 (Summer 1992)Long Range Planning, 26
M. Hannan (1984)
Structural Inertia and Organizational ChangeThe Sociological Review, 49
D. Lax, James Sebenius (1987)
The Manager as Negotiator
C. Sundaramurthy, Marianne Lewis (2003)
Control and Collaboration: Paradoxes of GovernanceAcademy of Management Review, 28
Jan Rivkin, Nicolaj Siggelkow (2003)
Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational DesignManag. Sci., 49
M. Nicholson (1967)
The Resolution of Conflict, 130
F. Heider (1958)
The psychology of interpersonal relations
H. Northrup, R. Walton, R. Mckersie (1966)
A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations.Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 19
David Nadler, M. Tushman, Mark Nadler (1997)
Competing By Design
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
Alfred Chandler (1962)
Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise
Nicolaj Siggelkow, Daniel Levinthal (2003)
Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and AdaptationOrgan. Sci., 14
C. Gibson, J. Birkinshaw (2004)
THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITYAcademy of Management Journal, 47
Mary Benner, M. Tushman (2002)
Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint IndustriesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 47
G. Dosi (1982)
Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical ChangeResearch Policy, 11
J. Bunderson, K. Sutcliffe (2003)
Management team learning orientation and business unit performance.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 3
Mary Tripsas, Giovanni Gavetti (2000)
Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imagingStrategic Management Journal, 21
D. Sull (1999)
The Dynamics of Standing Still: Firestone Tire & Rubber and the Radial RevolutionBusiness History Review, 73
G. Dosi (1993)
Technological Paradigms and Technological TrajectoriesResearch Policy, 22
M. Tushman (1997)
Winning through innovation
A. Huff (1997)
A Current and Future Agenda for Cognitive Research in OrganizationsPOL: Cultural-Cognitive Change Management Strategies (Topic)
R. Quinn, K. Cameron (1990)
Paradox and transformation : toward a theory of change in organization and managementAdministrative Science Quarterly, 35
Marianne Lewis (2000)
Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive GuideAcademy of Management Review, 25
J. Bunderson, K. Sutcliffe (2002)
Why some teams emphasize learning more than others: Evidence from business unit management teams., 4
Karen Bantel, S. Jackson (1989)
Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?Southern Medical Journal, 10
C. Nemeth, J. Wachtler (1983)
Creative problem solving as a result of majority vs minority influenceEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 13
Mary Tripsas (1997)
Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter IndustryStrategic Management Journal, 18
K. Weick, K. Roberts (1993)
Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks.Administrative Science Quarterly, 38
J. Collins, J. Porras (1994)
Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies
K. Eisenhardt, Mark Zbaracki (1992)
Strategic decision makingJournal of Management
M. Tushman, E. Romanelli (1985)
Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and ReorientationResearch in Organizational Behavior
J. Bunderson (2003)
Team Member Functional Background and Involvement in Management Teams: Direct Effects and the Moderating Role of Power CentralizationAcademy of Management Journal, 46
L. Paine (2002)
Value Shift: Why Companies Must Merge Social and Financial Imperatives to Achieve Superior Performance
Kathleen McGinn, Leigh Thompson, M. Bazerman (2003)
Dyadic processes of disclosure and reciprocity in bargaining with communicationJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16
R. Ely, David Thomas (2000)
Cultural Diversity at Work: The Moderating Effects of Work Group Perspectives on Diversity
N. Repenning (2002)
A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation ImplementationOrgan. Sci., 13
James Thompson (1967)
Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory
Robin Pinkley (1990)
Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict.Journal of Applied Psychology, 75
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1979)
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
Margaret Harrell, Harry Thie, Peter Schirmer, Kevin Brancato (2004)
Aligning the Stars
C. Gilbert (2005)
Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine RigidityAcademy of Management Journal, 48
Ron Adner, Constance Helfat (2003)
Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilitiesStrategic Management Journal, 24
R. Wageman (2001)
How Leaders Foster Self-Managing Team Effectiveness: Design Choices Versus Hands-on CoachingOrganization Science, 12
R. Ely, David Thomas (2001)
Cultural Diversity at Work: The Effects of Diversity Perspectives on Work Group Processes and OutcomesAdministrative Science Quarterly, 46
K. Cameron, R. Quinn (1988)
Organizational paradox and transformation.
Clayton Christensen (1997)
The Innovator's Dilemma
M. Tushman, C. O'Reilly (1996)
Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary ChangeCalifornia Management Review, 38
Sarah Kaplan, Fiona Murray, R. Henderson (2003)
Discontinuities and senior management: assessing the role of recognition in pharmaceutical firm response to biotechnologyIndustrial and Corporate Change, 12
L. Festinger (1957)
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
H. Chesbrough (2002)
Graceful Exits and Missed Opportunities: Xerox's Management of its Technology Spin-off OrganizationsBusiness History Review, 76
J. Dutton, S. Ashford (1993)
SELLING ISSUES TO TOP MANAGEMENTAcademy of Management Review, 18
P. Adler, Barbara Goldoftas, David Levine (1999)
Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system
J. Murnighan, Donald Conlon (1991)
The Dynamics of Intense Work Groups: A Study of British String QuartetsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 36
Zi-Lin He, P. Wong (2004)
Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity HypothesisOrgan. Sci., 15
Sam Palmisano (2004)
Leading change when business is good. Interview by Paul Hemp and Thomas A. Stewart.Harvard business review, 82 12
Shona Brown, K. Eisenhardt (1997)
The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting OrganizationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 42
J. Dutton, S. Jackson (1987)
Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational ActionAcademy of Management Review, 12
J. Margolis, J. Walsh (2003)
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by BusinessAdministrative Science Quarterly, 48
H. Gatignon, M. Tushman, Wendy Smith, P. Anderson (2002)
A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and CharacteristicsManag. Sci., 48
Beverly Virany, M. Tushman, E. Romanelli (1992)
Executive Succession and Organization Outcomes in Turbulent Environments: An Organization Learning ApproachOrganization Science, 3
W. Abernathy, K. Clark (1993)
Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆Research Policy, 22
D. Heenan, W. Bennis (1999)
Co-Leaders: The Power of Great Partnerships
R. Porter (1980)
Presidential Decision Making: The Economic Policy Board
Daniel Levinthal, J. March (1993)
The myopia of learningSouthern Medical Journal, 14
J. March (1991)
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
Pino Audia, E. Locke, Ken Smith (2000)
The Paradox of Success: An Archival and a Laboratory Study of Strategic Persistence Following Radical Environmental ChangeAcademy of Management Journal, 43
P. Suedfeld, P. Tetlock, S. Streufert (1992)
Motivation and personality: Conceptual/integrative complexity
W. Mitchell, Kulwant Singh (1996)
SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODSStrategic Management Journal, 17
L. Gruenfeld, Kenwyn Smith, D. Berg (1987)
Paradoxes of group life
M. Bazerman (1990)
Judgment in Managerial Decision Making
D. Denison, R. Hooijberg, R. Quinn (1995)
Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial LeadershipOrganization Science, 6
A. Witteloostuijn (2002)
Companion to organizationsBlackwell publishing
M. Poole, A. Ven (1989)
Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization TheoriesAcademy of Management Review, 14
R. Daft, K. Weick (1984)
Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation SystemsAcademy of Management Review, 9
M. Sherif (1958)
Superordinate Goals in the Reduction of Intergroup ConflictAmerican Journal of Sociology, 63
R. Miles, C. Snow, A. Meyer, H. Coleman (1978)
Organizational strategy, structure, and process.Academy of management review. Academy of Management, 3 3
R. Henderson, K. Clark (1990)
Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of
Richard D'Aveni, R. Gunther (1994)
Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering
Richard Hackman (2002)
Leading Teams: Setting the Stage for Great Performances
N. Haslam (2004)
Relational Models Theory : A Contemporary Overview
(1993)
Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder
I. Nonaka, R. Toyama (2002)
A firm as a dialectical being: towards a dynamic theory of a firmIndustrial and Corporate Change, 11
K. Weick, K. Sutcliffe, David Obstfeld (1999)
Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness.
R. Sutton (2002)
Fostering innovation : 11 1/2 weird ideas that work
M. Tyre, E. Hippel (1997)
Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations
S. Kerr (1975)
On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B.Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 18 4
A. Edmondson, M. Roberto, M. Watkins (2003)
A dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streamsLeadership Quarterly, 14
Dennis Gioia, A. Huff (1992)
Mapping Strategic Thought.Administrative Science Quarterly, 37
L. Donaldson (1997)
Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on OrganizationsAustralian Journal of Management, 22
B. Mullen, G. Goethals (1987)
Theories of group behavior
D. Denison, N. Ashkanasy, C. Wilderom, M. Peterson, C. Cooper, S. Cartwright, P. Earley (2003)
The International Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate
K. Eisenhardt, Jean Kahwajy, L. Bourgeois (1997)
Conflict and Strategic Choice: How Top Management Teams DisagreeCalifornia Management Review, 39
H. Kelley (1987)
Attribution in social interaction.
C. Argyris, Donald Schön (1978)
Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective
Carrie Leana, B. Barry (2000)
Stability and Change as Simultaneous Experiences in Organizational LifeAcademy of Management Review, 25
A. Ven, Douglas Polley, R. Garud, S. Venkataraman (1999)
The innovation journey
J. Ford, R. Backoff (1988)
Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox.
L. Perlow, J. Gittell, N. Katz (2004)
Contextualizing Patterns of Work Group Interaction: Toward a Nested Theory of StructurationOrgan. Sci., 15
E. Romanelli, M. Tushman (1994)
Organizational Transformation as Punctuated Equilibrium: An Empirical TestAcademy of Management Journal, 37
T. Stewart, Paul Hemp (2004)
Leading Change When Business Is GoodHarvard Business Review, 82
R. Wood, Wendy Smith, G. Westerman, M. Tushman (2002)
Innovation Streams and Ambidextrous Organizational Forms
Philip Anderson, M. Tushman (2001)
Organizational Environments and Industry Exit: the Effects of Uncertainty, Munificence and ComplexityIndustrial and Corporate Change, 10
J. Walsh (1995)
Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory LaneOrganization Science, 6
Sustained organizational performance depends on top management teams effectively exploring and exploiting. These strategic agendas are, however, associated with contradictory organizational architectures. Using the literature on paradox, contradictions, and conflict, we develop a model of managing strategic contradictions that is associated with paradoxical cognition—senior leaders and/or their teams (a) articulating a paradoxical frame, (b) differentiating between the strategy and architecture for the existing product and those for innovation, and (c) integrating between those strategies and architectures. We further argue that the locus of paradox in top management teams resides either with the senior leader or with the entire team. We identify a set of top management team conditions that facilitates a team’s ability to engage in paradoxical cognitive processes.
Organization Science – INFORMS
Published: Oct 1, 2005
Keywords: Keywords : top management teams ; innovation ; exploration and exploitation ; paradox ; cognition
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.