Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Kök, M. Fisher, R. Vaidyanathan (2008)
Assortment Planning: Review of Literature and Industry Practice
Serguei Netessine, N. Rudi (2002)
Centralized and Competitive Inventory Models with Demand SubstitutionOper. Res., 51
G. Ryzin, Siddharth Mahajan (1999)
On the Relationship Between Inventory Costs and Variety Benefits in RetailassortmentsManagement Science, 45
D. Pentico (1974)
The Assortment Problem with Probabilistic DemandsManagement Science, 21
V Gaur, D Honhon (2006)
Product variety and inventory decisions under a locational consumer choice model, 52
Dorothée Honhon, V. Gaur, S. Seshadri (2009)
Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions Under Stockout-Based SubstitutionOper. Res., 58
Stephen Smith, N. Agrawal (2000)
Management of Multi-Item Retail Inventory Systems with Demand SubstitutionOper. Res., 48
V. Gaur, Dorothée Honhon (2006)
Assortment Planning and Inventory Decisions Under a Locational Choice ModelManag. Sci., 52
Siddharth Mahajan, G. Ryzin (2001)
Stocking Retail Assortments Under Dynamic Consumer SubstitutionOper. Res., 49
V Goyal, R Levi, D Segev (2012)
Near-optimal algorithms for the assortment planning problem under dynamic substitution and stochastic demand
W. Hopp, Xiaowei Xu (2008)
A Static Approximation for Dynamic Demand Substitution with Applications in a Competitive MarketOper. Res., 56
We consider the problem of determining the optimal assortment of products to offer in a given product category when each customer is characterized by a type, which is a list of products he is willing to buy in decreasing order of preference. We assume consumer-driven, dynamic, stockout-based substitution and random proportions of each type. No efficient method to obtain the optimal solution for this problem is known to our knowledge. However, if the number of customers of each type is a fixed proportion of demand, there exists an efficient algorithm for solving for the optimal assortment. We show that the fixed proportions model gives an upper bound to the optimal expected profit for the random proportions model. This bound allows us to obtain a measure of the absolute performance of heuristic solutions. We also provide a bound for the component-wise absolute difference in expected sales between the two models, which is asymptotically tight as the inventory vector is made large, while keeping the number of products fixed. This result provides us with a lower bound to the optimal expected profit and a performance guarantee for the fixed proportions solution in the random proportions model.
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management – INFORMS
Published: Jul 15, 2013
Keywords: Keywords : assortment planning ; inventory management ; bounds ; stockout-based substitution
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.