Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
I. Steiner (1966)
Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity.Behavioral science, 11 4
J. McGrath (1984)
Groups: Interaction and Performance
S. Harkins, R. Petty (1982)
Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43
Gerardine Desancytis, V. Sambamurthy, R. Watson (1988)
COMPUTER-SUPPORTED MEETINGS: BUILDING A RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT.Large scale systems, 13
J. Elam, Melissa Mead (1987)
Designing for creativity: Considerations for DSS developmentInf. Manag., 13
G. DeSanctis, R. Gallupe (1987)
A foundation for the study of group decision support systemsManagement Science, 33
C. Gettys, R. Pliske, C. Manning, Jeff Casey (1987)
An evaluation of human act generation performanceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39
J. Siegel, V. Dubrovsky, S. Kiesler, T. McGuire (1986)
Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37
J. Nunamaker, L. Applegate, B. Konsynski (1988)
Computer-Aided Deliberation: Model Management and Group Decision Support: Special Focus ArticleOper. Res., 36
H. Lamm, G. Trommsdorff (1973)
Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency
P. Zimbardo (1969)
The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos., 17
D. Schweiger, William Sandberg, James Ragan (1986)
Group Approaches for Improving Strategic Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Dialectical Inquiry, Devil's Advocacy, and ConsensusAcademy of Management Journal, 29
N. Dalkey, O. Helmer (1963)
An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of ExpertsManagement Science, 9
S. Jarvenpaa, V. Rao, George Huber (1988)
Computer Support for Meetings of Groups Working on Unstructured Problems: A Field ExperimentMIS Q., 12
R. Leitheiser (1986)
Computer support for knowledge workers: A review of laboratory experimentsData Base, 17
R. Steeb, S. Johnston (1981)
A Computer-Based Interactive System for Group DecisionmakingIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11
E. Diener, S. Fraser, A. Beaman, Roger Kelem (1976)
Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33
E. Weldon, Elisa Mustari (1988)
Felt dispensability in groups of coactors: The effects of shared responsibility and explicit anonymity on cognitive effortOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41
A. Dennis, J. George, L. Jessup, J. Nunamaker, D. Vogel (1988)
Information Technology to Support Electronic MeetingsMIS Q., 12
Panayiota Collaros, L. Anderson (1969)
Effect of perceived expertness upon creativity of members of brainstorming groups.The Journal of applied psychology, 53 2
R. Gallupe, G. DeSanctis, G. Dickson (1988)
Computer-Based Support for Group Problem-Finding: An Experimental InvestigationMIS Q., 12
L. Festinger, A. Pepitone, T. Newcomb (1952)
Some consequences of de-individuation in a groupThe Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47
G. Huber (1990)
A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence
C. Gettys, Stanley Fisher (1979)
Hypothesis plausibility and hypothesis generationOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24
K. Kraemer, J. King (1988)
Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decision makingACM Comput. Surv., 20
M. Diehl, W. Stroebe (1987)
Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53
I. Steiner (1972)
Group process and productivity
M. Turoff, S. Hiltz (1982)
Computer Support for Group Versus Individual DecisionsIEEE Trans. Commun., 30
L. Applegate, B. Konsynski, J. Nunamaker (1986)
A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning
A laboratory experiment was used to evaluate the effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on computer-mediated groups using a group decision support system to perform an idea-generation task. Evaluative tone was manipulated through a confederate group member who entered supportive or critical comments into the automated brainstorming system. Groups working anonymously and with a critical confederate produced the greatest number of original solutions and overall comments, yet average solution quality per item and average solution rarity were not different across conditions. Identified groups working with a supportive confederate were the most satisfied and had the highest levels of perceived effectiveness, but produced the fewest original solutions and overall comments.
Management Science – INFORMS
Published: Jun 1, 1990
Keywords: Keywords : anonymity ; evaluative tone ; group problem solving ; group decision support system ; electronic meeting system
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.