“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

Forum Theorizing in the context of professional practice: the case for middle-range theories

This commentary seeks to complement the contribution of the Building Research & Information special issue on 'Developing Theories for the Built Environment' (2008) by highlighting the important role of middle-range theories within the context of professional practice. Middle-range theories provide a form of theorizing that lies between abstract grand theorizing and atheoretical local descriptions. They are also characterized by the way in which they directly engage with the concerns of practitioners. In the context of professional practice, any commitment to theorizing should habitually be combined with an equivalent commitment to empirical research; rarely is it appropriate to neglect one in favour of the other. Any understanding of the role that theory plays in professional practice must further be informed by Sch n's seminal ideas on reflective practice. Practitioners are seen to utilize theories as inputs to a process of continuous reflection, thereby guarding against complacency and routinization. The authors would challenge any assumption that academics alone are responsible for generating theories, thereby limiting the role of practitioners to their application. Such a dichotomized view is contrary to established ideas on Mode 2 knowledge production and current trends towards co-production research in the context of the built environment. Ce commentaire vise compl ter l'article du num ro sp cial de Building Research & Information sur «Le D veloppement de Th ories pour l'Environnement B ti» (2008) en soulignant le r le important des th ories de moyenne port e dans le contexte des usages professionnels. Les th ories de moyenne port e assurent une forme de th orisation qui se situe entre les grandes th orisations abstraites et les descriptions locales o la th orie est absente. Elles se caract risent galement par la mani re dont elles s'int ressent directement aux pr occupations des praticiens. Dans le contexte des usages professionnels, tout engagement th oriser devrait habituellement tre conjugu un engagement quivalent envers la recherche empirique; il est rarement opportun de n gliger l'un au b n fice de l'autre. Toute compr hension du r le que la th orie joue dans les usages professionnels doit en outre tre influenc e par les id es s minales de Sch n sur la pratique r flexive. Les praticiens sont consid r s comme utilisant les th ories comme facteurs intrants dans un processus de r flexion continue, se gardant ainsi de toute autosatisfaction et de toute tendance la routine. Les auteurs contesteraient toute hypoth se selon laquelle les universitaires sont seulement responsables de la cr ation des th ories, ce qui limiterait de ce fait le r le des praticiens leur application. Un tel point de vue dichotomis est contraire aux id es tablies concernant la production de connaissances de Mode 2 et aux tendances actuelles en mati re de recherche sur la coproduction dans le contexte de l'environnement b ti. Mots cl s: environnement b ti, recherche sur la coproduction, production de connaissances, th orie de moyenne port e, pratique r flexive http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Building Research & Information Informa Healthcare

Forum Theorizing in the context of professional practice: the case for middle-range theories

Abstract

This commentary seeks to complement the contribution of the Building Research & Information special issue on 'Developing Theories for the Built Environment' (2008) by highlighting the important role of middle-range theories within the context of professional practice. Middle-range theories provide a form of theorizing that lies between abstract grand theorizing and atheoretical local descriptions. They are also characterized by the way in which they directly engage with the concerns of practitioners. In the context of professional practice, any commitment to theorizing should habitually be combined with an equivalent commitment to empirical research; rarely is it appropriate to neglect one in favour of the other. Any understanding of the role that theory plays in professional practice must further be informed by Sch n's seminal ideas on reflective practice. Practitioners are seen to utilize theories as inputs to a process of continuous reflection, thereby guarding against complacency and routinization. The authors would challenge any assumption that academics alone are responsible for generating theories, thereby limiting the role of practitioners to their application. Such a dichotomized view is contrary to established ideas on Mode 2 knowledge production and current trends towards co-production research in the context of the built environment. Ce commentaire vise compl ter l'article du num ro sp cial de Building Research & Information sur «Le D veloppement de Th ories pour l'Environnement B ti» (2008) en soulignant le r le important des th ories de moyenne port e dans le contexte des usages professionnels. Les th ories de moyenne port e assurent une forme de th orisation qui se situe entre les grandes th orisations abstraites et les descriptions locales o la th orie est absente. Elles se caract risent galement par la mani re dont elles s'int ressent directement aux pr occupations des praticiens. Dans le contexte des usages professionnels, tout engagement th oriser devrait habituellement tre conjugu un engagement quivalent envers la recherche empirique; il est rarement opportun de n gliger l'un au b n fice de l'autre. Toute compr hension du r le que la th orie joue dans les usages professionnels doit en outre tre influenc e par les id es s minales de Sch n sur la pratique r flexive. Les praticiens sont consid r s comme utilisant les th ories comme facteurs intrants dans un processus de r flexion continue, se gardant ainsi de toute autosatisfaction et de toute tendance la routine. Les auteurs contesteraient toute hypoth se selon laquelle les universitaires sont seulement responsables de la cr ation des th ories, ce qui limiterait de ce fait le r le des praticiens leur application. Un tel point de vue dichotomis est contraire aux id es tablies concernant la production de connaissances de Mode 2 et aux tendances actuelles en mati re de recherche sur la coproduction dans le contexte de l'environnement b ti. Mots cl s: environnement b ti, recherche sur la coproduction, production de connaissances, th orie de moyenne port e, pratique r flexive
Loading next page...
 
/lp/informa-healthcare/forum-theorizing-in-the-context-of-professional-practice-the-case-for-iFu5bLq4II

Sorry, we don’t have permission to share this article on DeepDyve,
but here are related articles that you can start reading right now:

Explore the DeepDyve Library

How DeepDyve Works

Spend time researching, not time worrying you’re buying articles that might not be useful.

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Simple and Affordable Pricing

14-day free trial. Cancel anytime, with a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$40/month

Best Deal — 25% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 25% off!
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$30/month
billed annually