Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Comprehensive watershed planning and management requires valuation of the intermediate ecological services provided to the water resources. Valuation of forest cover as an ecological service is discussed in the context of three levels of decision–making, and illustrated for the Pearl Harbor/Ko'olau watershed (Hawai'i). Objectives of planning such as sustainable development do not require new criteria but augmentation of existing methods of income accounting and project valuation. Full income valuation implies that the value of water should incorporate the value of maintaining contributory degradable ecological capital. Valuation does not require using survey methods, even when the usual alternatives (hedonics, etc.) are not applicable.
Interdisciplinary Environmental Review – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.