Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
When facing risky technology investments or ventures 'real option thinking' – the managerial flexibility to capitalise on opportunities when they arise and/or to minimise the impact of threats – is precisely what is needed. Notwithstanding this, we argue Real Options Valuation (ROV) is inferior to traditional decision tree analysis for this context. Our reasoning is twofold. Firstly, ROV techniques provide a sophisticated treatment of market risks, but do not deal with firm-specific risks. However, the elevated risk facing technology ventures is predominantly firm-specific risk. Secondly, ROV has a severe practical limitation for new technology ventures. The starting point for ROV is to value the "underlying asset" – the venture/project in the absence of the 'real options' – using discounted cash flow techniques. But the risk profile/discount rate can not be established for this nonsensical hypothetical entity – because the 'real options' are an integral part of technology venture.
International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.