Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Joint distribution is both cooperative and mutual beneficial for participant enterprises who, in practice, are much more concerned about the share of income and the allocation of cost brought by joint distribution. In this paper, some methods in cooperation game and bargaining game are applied to calculate the cost that every member of joint distribution should undertake. By comparing and analysing the algorithm hypotheses and allocation results of Nash bargaining solution in bargaining game, simple proration and evaluation approach in cooperation game, it can be concluded that evaluation approach in cooperation game can reflect the principle of equity and rationality more directly than the other two methods. So this paper takes evaluation approach as the rule to allocate the members' interest in joint distribution.
International Journal of Services Operations and Informatics – Inderscience Publishers
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.