Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Hume on Artificial Lives with a Rejoinder to A.C. MacIntyre

Hume on Artificial Lives with a Rejoinder to A.C. MacIntyre LIVES a Rejoder A.C. Maclntyre The variety of hum cultures fascated Enlightenment thkers d evoked certa problems f philosophical discussi. Wide experience of other societies, as well as the study of histy, disclosed mal terestgly different modern Europe mes. Also a student of other cultures, histical d ctempary, David is a moderate pluralist the matter of alternative mal . He acknowledges there are readers of values other th shared by his which qualify as malities; but me terestgly, he also holds there are some such which, despite the claims of their adherents, fail qualify as malities. Thus opposes fms of relativism allow y which a community deems be a mal code has be acknowledged as cstitutg a genue mality. this paper I address the questi of how c discrimate amg value d declare some be malities, some . Given the design of his philosophical approach mals, addressg this questi is a matter of some imptce f , sce he matas mal reflecti takes its departure everyday mal beliefs d sentiments. This beg the case, we might expect what should count as 'everyday mal beliefs d sentiments' would be whatsoever y dividual group puts fward as a mality, d http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Hume Studies Hume Society

Hume on Artificial Lives with a Rejoinder to A.C. MacIntyre

Hume Studies , Volume 14 (1) – Jan 26, 1988

Loading next page...
 
/lp/hume-society/hume-on-artificial-lives-with-a-rejoinder-to-a-c-macintyre-0qcozQ5qzC

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Hume Society
Copyright
Copyright © Hume Society
ISSN
1947-9921
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

LIVES a Rejoder A.C. Maclntyre The variety of hum cultures fascated Enlightenment thkers d evoked certa problems f philosophical discussi. Wide experience of other societies, as well as the study of histy, disclosed mal terestgly different modern Europe mes. Also a student of other cultures, histical d ctempary, David is a moderate pluralist the matter of alternative mal . He acknowledges there are readers of values other th shared by his which qualify as malities; but me terestgly, he also holds there are some such which, despite the claims of their adherents, fail qualify as malities. Thus opposes fms of relativism allow y which a community deems be a mal code has be acknowledged as cstitutg a genue mality. this paper I address the questi of how c discrimate amg value d declare some be malities, some . Given the design of his philosophical approach mals, addressg this questi is a matter of some imptce f , sce he matas mal reflecti takes its departure everyday mal beliefs d sentiments. This beg the case, we might expect what should count as 'everyday mal beliefs d sentiments' would be whatsoever y dividual group puts fward as a mality, d

Journal

Hume StudiesHume Society

Published: Jan 26, 1988

There are no references for this article.