Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
LIVES a Rejoder A.C. Maclntyre The variety of hum cultures fascated Enlightenment thkers d evoked certa problems f philosophical discussi. Wide experience of other societies, as well as the study of histy, disclosed mal terestgly different modern Europe mes. Also a student of other cultures, histical d ctempary, David is a moderate pluralist the matter of alternative mal . He acknowledges there are readers of values other th shared by his which qualify as malities; but me terestgly, he also holds there are some such which, despite the claims of their adherents, fail qualify as malities. Thus opposes fms of relativism allow y which a community deems be a mal code has be acknowledged as cstitutg a genue mality. this paper I address the questi of how c discrimate amg value d declare some be malities, some . Given the design of his philosophical approach mals, addressg this questi is a matter of some imptce f , sce he matas mal reflecti takes its departure everyday mal beliefs d sentiments. This beg the case, we might expect what should count as 'everyday mal beliefs d sentiments' would be whatsoever y dividual group puts fward as a mality, d
Hume Studies – Hume Society
Published: Jan 26, 1988
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.