Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Simon Bradstreet (2006)
Harnessing the ‘Lived Experience’: Formalising Peer Support Approaches to Promote RecoveryMental Health Review Journal, 11
H. Spandler (2001)
Who's Hurting Who? Young People, Self-Harm and Suicide
Virginia Braun, Victoria Clarke
Please Scroll down for Article Qualitative Research in Psychology Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology
L. Adamsen (2002)
'From victim to agent': the clinical and social significance of self-help group participation for people with life-threatening diseases.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 16 3
P. Seebohm, C. Munn-Giddings, P. Brewer (2010)
What's in a name?: a discussion paper on the labels and location of self-organising community groups, with particular reference to mental health and Black groupsMental Health and Social Inclusion, 14
L. Pembroke (2006)
Offer us what we want.Mental health today
M. Straiton, K. Roen, G. Dieserud, H. Hjelmeland (2013)
Pushing the boundaries: understanding self-harm in a non-clinical population.Archives of psychiatric nursing, 27 2
K. Inckle (2008)
Flesh wounds?: new ways of understanding self-injury
N. Visram, A. Roberts, P. Seebohm (2012)
The role of self‐help groups in promoting well‐being: experiences from a cancer groupMental Health and Social Inclusion, 16
A. Faulkner, T. Basset (2012)
A long and honourable historyThe Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 7
Barbara Dick (1971)
The Theory and Practice of Group PsychotherapyMental Health, 29
A. Simpson (2006)
Can mainstream health services provide meaningful care for people who self-harm? A critical reflection.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 13 4
D. Jeffery, A. Warm (2002)
A study of service providers' understanding of self-harmJournal of Mental Health, 11
J. Corcoran, A. Mewse, G. Babiker (2007)
The role of women's self‐injury support‐groups: a grounded theoryJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17
A. Warm, C. Murray, J. Fox (2002)
Who helps? Supporting people who self-harmJournal of Mental Health, 11
A. Ben–Ari (2002)
Dimensions and predictions of professional involvement in self-help groups: a view from within.Health & social work, 27 2
Sarah Chaudhary, M. Avis, C. Munn-Giddings (2010)
The lifespan and life-cycle of self-help groups: a retrospective study of groups in Nottingham, UK.Health & social care in the community, 18 4
S. Lawton-Smith (2013)
Peer support in mental health: where are we today?The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice, 8
C. Medlin (2007)
Case Study Research
Groupwork, 24
G. Rayner, S. Warner (2003)
Research Report: Self-harming behaviour: from lay perceptions to clinical practiceCounselling Psychology Quarterly, 16
M. McAllister (2003)
Multiple meanings of self harm: a critical review.International journal of mental health nursing, 12 3
Maggie Turp (2002)
Hidden Self-Harm: Narratives from Psychotherapy
C. Munn-Giddings, M. Avis, Melanie Boyce, Sarah Chaudhary, P. Seebohm (2017)
Being a ‘Self-Help Supporter’: Recognising the roles that community practitioners can adopt in supporting self-help groups
Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a qualitative analysis of the role of self-harm self-help groups from the perspective of group members.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative case study approach guided the research, which involved working with two self-harm self-help groups and all regularly attending members.FindingsA thematic approach to the analysis of the findings indicates that self-harm self-help groups can provide a safe, non-judgemental space where those who self-harm can meet, listen and talk to others who share similar experiences for reciprocal peer support. Offering a different approach to that experienced in statutory services, the groups reduced members’ isolation and offered opportunities for learning and findings ways to lessen and better manage their self-harm.Research limitations/implicationsThis was a small-scale qualitative study, hence it is not possible to generalise the findings to all self-harm self-help groups.Practical implicationsThe value of peers supporting one another, as a means of aiding recovery and improving well-being, has gained credence in recent years, but remains limited for those who self-harm. The findings from this research highlight the value of self-help groups in providing opportunities for peer support and the facilitative role practitioners can play in the development of self-harm self-help groups.Originality/valueSelf-harm self-help groups remain an underexplored area, despite such groups being identified as a valuable source of support by its members. This research provides empirical evidence, at an individual and group level, into the unique role of self-harm self-help groups.
Mental Health Review Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 12, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.