A comparison of two multivariate analysis methods for segmenting users of alternative payment means

A comparison of two multivariate analysis methods for segmenting users of alternative payment means PurposeAlternative payment means have been expanding rapidly in recent years. The need to identify the segments of customers that are targetable for both financial and nonfinancial institutions is growing. The purpose of this paper is to use two different methods, discriminant analysis and decision trees, in order to compare the effectiveness of the two methods for segmentation and identify critical consumer characteristics which determine behavior and preference in relation to the use of payment means.Design/methodology/approachUsing data from 321 bank customers, decision tree and discriminant analysis methods are used, first to test the same set of variables differentiating the customers and then to compare the respective results and prediction ability of the two methods.FindingsResults show that discriminant analysis has a better model fit and segments the customers in a more effective way than the decision tree method. In addition, each method shows different variables to differentiate the customer groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are limited to the sector and country of the study, as well as the convenience sample that has been used.Practical implicationsSuggestions for financial managers to better understand their customers’ behavior and target the right group are discussed.Originality/valueThis is the first attempt to compare decision trees and discriminant analysis as alternative segmentation methods for payment means. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Bank Marketing Emerald Publishing

A comparison of two multivariate analysis methods for segmenting users of alternative payment means

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald/a-comparison-of-two-multivariate-analysis-methods-for-segmenting-users-Jrcdcs2x5i
Publisher
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0265-2323
D.O.I.
10.1108/IJBM-10-2016-0157
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeAlternative payment means have been expanding rapidly in recent years. The need to identify the segments of customers that are targetable for both financial and nonfinancial institutions is growing. The purpose of this paper is to use two different methods, discriminant analysis and decision trees, in order to compare the effectiveness of the two methods for segmentation and identify critical consumer characteristics which determine behavior and preference in relation to the use of payment means.Design/methodology/approachUsing data from 321 bank customers, decision tree and discriminant analysis methods are used, first to test the same set of variables differentiating the customers and then to compare the respective results and prediction ability of the two methods.FindingsResults show that discriminant analysis has a better model fit and segments the customers in a more effective way than the decision tree method. In addition, each method shows different variables to differentiate the customer groups.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are limited to the sector and country of the study, as well as the convenience sample that has been used.Practical implicationsSuggestions for financial managers to better understand their customers’ behavior and target the right group are discussed.Originality/valueThis is the first attempt to compare decision trees and discriminant analysis as alternative segmentation methods for payment means.

Journal

International Journal of Bank MarketingEmerald Publishing

Published: Apr 3, 2018

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off