Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

“You have to say everything is nice here”

“You have to say everything is nice here” The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the author’s research experiences in northern Mozambique in order explore the multiplicity of gatekeeper relations that arose while seeking to arrange access to both “the field” and respondents, as well as the impacts that these relationships had on the research process. Although this dynamic has been thoroughly described within methodological literature, there exists a tendency to presume research–gatekeeper relations as static; once established, there is little discussion on how the relationships develop or can be managed, once access has (or has not) been achieved.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws upon qualitative fieldwork conducted predominantly in rural communities in northern Mozambique. The study analysed the development of the Nacala Development Corridor programme and the N13 Highway Rehabilitation Project in northern Mozambique in order to examine the impacts of the development on local citizens and examine the relationship between citizen and state within development processes. Fieldwork consisted of three different phases of semi-structured and open-ended interviews with key stakeholders and affected persons, spanning five different interview schedules, and a total of 77 individual interviews and 27 community focus groups conducted along the N13.FindingsThe study found that duality of Mozambican governance which includes both local officials and traditional leadership contributed to a multiplicity of local gatekeepers which impacted the research process in a multitude of ways. As a result, researcher–gatekeeper relations were not static, but had to be managed throughout the duration of the study.Originality/valueThis discussion provides a more dynamic representation of the challenges involved with establishing and managing gatekeeper relations in rural, developing, and in particular, southern African, contexts, while offering cautious practical advice to researchers working within rural or southern African contexts. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research Journal Emerald Publishing

“You have to say everything is nice here”

Kalina, Marc; Scott, Dianne
Qualitative Research Journal , Volume 19 (3): 17 – Jun 4, 2019
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/you-have-to-say-everything-is-nice-here-oCXzB1ErU4
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1443-9883
DOI
10.1108/qrj-12-2018-0011
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to reflect on the author’s research experiences in northern Mozambique in order explore the multiplicity of gatekeeper relations that arose while seeking to arrange access to both “the field” and respondents, as well as the impacts that these relationships had on the research process. Although this dynamic has been thoroughly described within methodological literature, there exists a tendency to presume research–gatekeeper relations as static; once established, there is little discussion on how the relationships develop or can be managed, once access has (or has not) been achieved.Design/methodology/approachThe paper draws upon qualitative fieldwork conducted predominantly in rural communities in northern Mozambique. The study analysed the development of the Nacala Development Corridor programme and the N13 Highway Rehabilitation Project in northern Mozambique in order to examine the impacts of the development on local citizens and examine the relationship between citizen and state within development processes. Fieldwork consisted of three different phases of semi-structured and open-ended interviews with key stakeholders and affected persons, spanning five different interview schedules, and a total of 77 individual interviews and 27 community focus groups conducted along the N13.FindingsThe study found that duality of Mozambican governance which includes both local officials and traditional leadership contributed to a multiplicity of local gatekeepers which impacted the research process in a multitude of ways. As a result, researcher–gatekeeper relations were not static, but had to be managed throughout the duration of the study.Originality/valueThis discussion provides a more dynamic representation of the challenges involved with establishing and managing gatekeeper relations in rural, developing, and in particular, southern African, contexts, while offering cautious practical advice to researchers working within rural or southern African contexts.

Journal

Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 4, 2019

Keywords: Africa; Qualitative research; Fieldwork; Mozambique; Gatekeepers; Traditional leadership

References

  • Is information power? Using mobile phones and free newspapers during an election in Mozambique
    Aker, J.; Collier, P.; Vicente, P.
  • By any means necessary? Ethnographic access, ethics and the critical researcher
    Alcadipani, R.; Hodgson, D.
  • ‘It’s a case of access.’ The problematics of accessing research participants
    Amundsen, D.; Msoroka, M.; Findsen, B.
  • Walking a tightrope: reflections on police gatekeeping roles in suicide research in Ghana
    Andoh-Arthur, J.; Hjelmeland, H.; Osafo, J.; Knizek, B.L.
  • Patching things up in Mozambique
    Azevedo-Harman, E.
  • Sexuality and power on South African game farms; reflections on positionality and emotions in ethnographic research
    Brandt, F.; Josefsson, J.
  • Gatekeepers and keymasters: dynamic relationships of access in geographical fieldwork
    Campbell, L.M.; Gray, N.J.; Meletis, Z.; Abbott, J.G.; Silver, J.J.
  • Gaining and maintaining access: exploring the mechanisms that support and challenge the relationship between gatekeepers and researchers
    Clark, T.
  • More than just translation: challenges and opportunities in translingual research
    Crane, C.G.; Lombard, M.B.; Tenz, E.M.
  • Critical qualitative methodologies
    Denzin, N.K.; Lincoln, Y.S.; MacLure, M.; Otterstad, A.M.; Torrance, H.; Cannella, G.S.; Koro-Ljungberg, M.; McTier, T.
  • Editorial: field-work in geography
    Driver, F.
  • Accessing socially excluded people – trust and the gatekeeper in the researcher-participant relationship
    Emmel, N.; Hughes, K.; Greenhalgh, J.; Sales, A.
  • Qualitative research: a consumer’s guide
    Frankel, R.M.; Devers, K.
  • Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition, and participation
    Fraser, N.
  • The naïve researcher: doing social research in Africa
    Gokah, T.
  • On the inside looking in: methodological insights and challenges in conducting qualitative insider research
    Greene, M.J.
  • What we didn’t learn because of who would not talk to us
    Groger, L.; Mayberry, P.
  • Engendering everyday resistance: gender, patronage and production politics in rural Malaysia
    Hart, G.
  • Geography and development: critical ethnographies
    Hart, G.
  • Dear diary: early career geographers collectively reflect on their qualitative field research experiences
    Heller, E.; Christensen, J.; Long, L.; Mackenzie, C.A.; Osano, P.M.; Ricker, B.; Kagan, E.; Turner, S.
  • Strategies for gaining access in doing fieldwork: reflection of two researchers
    Johl, S.K.; Renganathan, S.
  • Citizen, state, and the negotiation of development: the Nacala Development Corridor and the N13 Highway Rehabilitation programme
    Kalina, M.
  • ‘Governo Papa’ and the ‘uncritical citizen’: citizenship, subjectness, and the state in northern Mozambique
    Kalina, M.; Scott, D.
  • Unpacking the problem of research access(es): the case of large knowledge-intensive international consultancies
    Karjalainen, M.; Niemistö, C.; Hearn, J.
  • Dwelling on the road: routines, rituals, and roadblocks in southern Ghana
    Klaeger, G.
  • Civil society in Mozambique: NGOs, religion, politics, and witchcraft
    Kleibl, T.; Munck, R.
  • Introduction – field methods in ‘closed contexts:’ undertaking research in authoritarian states and places
    Koch, N.
  • The ‘over-researched community’: an ethics analysis of stakeholder views at two South African HIV prevention research sites
    Koen, J.; Wassenaar, D.; Mamotte, N.
  • Frontiers in group dynamics
    Lewin, K.
  • Narrating spaces of inclusion and exclusion in research collaboration – researcher-gatekeeper dialogue
    Lund, R.; Panda, S.M.; Dhal, M.P.
  • Structuring the unseen environment
    McCombs, M.E.; Shaw, D.L.
  • The role of gatekeepers in research: learning from reflexivity and reflection
    McFadyen, J.; Rankin, J.
  • On the coloniality of being: contributions to the development of a concept
    Maldonado-Torres, N.
  • Negotiating expectations in the field: gatekeepers, research fatigue and cultural biases
    Mandel, J.L.
  • Between ‘in camp’ and ‘out of bounds’: notes on the history of fieldwork in American geography
    Mathewson, K.
  • Traditional authorities in Mozambique: between legitimisation and legitimacy
    Meneses, M.P.G.
  • Insider or outsider, both or neither: some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting
    Mullings, B.
  • The allure and privileging of danger of everyday practice in field research
    Nelson, I.
  • The problem of sampling in qualitative research
    Oppong, S.
  • The humanitarian infrastructure and the question of over-research: reflections on fieldwork in the refugee crises in the Middle East and North Africa
    Pascucci, E.
  • A difficult negotiation: fieldwork relations with gatekeepers
    Reeves, C.L.
  • Methodological dilemmas: gatekeepers and positionality in Bradford
    Sanghera, G.S.; Thapar-Björkert, S.
  • Contextualising the role of the gatekeeper in social science research
    Singh, S.; Wassenaar, D.R.
  • Under suspicious eyes – surveillance states, security zones and ethnographic fieldwork
    Sökefeld, M.; Strasser, S.
  • Qualitative research and translation dilemmas
    Temple, B.; Young, A.
  • Red stamps and green tea: fieldwork negotiations and dilemmas in the Sino-Vietnamese borderlands
    Turner, S.
  • Resource-based sustainable development in the lower Zambezi basin
  • What a dolt one is: language learning and fieldwork in geography
    Watson, E.