Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Worker representation and temporary employment in Germany

Worker representation and temporary employment in Germany The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of key labor institutions on the occurrence and extent of temporary employment.Design/methodology/approachIn a new departure, this study uses a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model given that most establishments are non-users of either fixed-term contracts (FTCs) or temporary agency workers.FindingsThis study examines the potential impact of works councils and unions on the use and intensity of use of FTCs and temporary agency work. There is a little indication that these variables are correlated with the use/non-use of either type of temporary work, especially in the case of FTCs. Collective bargaining displays different relationships with their intensity of use: a negative association for sectoral bargaining and FTCs and the converse for firm-level bargaining and agency temps. Of more interest, however, is the covariation between the number of temporary employees and the interaction between works councils and product market volatility. The intensity of use of agency temps (FTCs) is predicted to rise (fall) as volatility increases whenever a works council is present. These disparities require further investigation but most likely reflect differences in function, with agency work being more directed toward the protection of an arguably shrinking core and fixed-term contacts encountering resistance to their increased use as a buffer stock. The two types of temporary employment are seemingly non-complementary, an interpretation that receives support from the study’s further analysis of FTC flow data.Research limitations/implicationsThe non-complementarity of the two types of contract is the hallmark of this paper.Originality/valueThe first study to deploy a ZINB model to examine both the occurrence and incidence of temporary work. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership Emerald Publishing

Worker representation and temporary employment in Germany

Download PDF
23 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/worker-representation-and-temporary-employment-in-germany-dMpXy9Y0DZ
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2514-7641
DOI
10.1108/jpeo-11-2017-0003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of key labor institutions on the occurrence and extent of temporary employment.Design/methodology/approachIn a new departure, this study uses a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model given that most establishments are non-users of either fixed-term contracts (FTCs) or temporary agency workers.FindingsThis study examines the potential impact of works councils and unions on the use and intensity of use of FTCs and temporary agency work. There is a little indication that these variables are correlated with the use/non-use of either type of temporary work, especially in the case of FTCs. Collective bargaining displays different relationships with their intensity of use: a negative association for sectoral bargaining and FTCs and the converse for firm-level bargaining and agency temps. Of more interest, however, is the covariation between the number of temporary employees and the interaction between works councils and product market volatility. The intensity of use of agency temps (FTCs) is predicted to rise (fall) as volatility increases whenever a works council is present. These disparities require further investigation but most likely reflect differences in function, with agency work being more directed toward the protection of an arguably shrinking core and fixed-term contacts encountering resistance to their increased use as a buffer stock. The two types of temporary employment are seemingly non-complementary, an interpretation that receives support from the study’s further analysis of FTC flow data.Research limitations/implicationsThe non-complementarity of the two types of contract is the hallmark of this paper.Originality/valueThe first study to deploy a ZINB model to examine both the occurrence and incidence of temporary work.

Journal

Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 20, 2019

Keywords: Germany; Worker representation; Complementarity; Demand volatility; Temporary employment; Zero-inflated negative binomial model

References

  • Atypical Work and Employment Continuity
    Addison, J.T.; Surfield, J.S.
  • Worker representation and temporary employment in Germany: the deployment and extent of fixed-term contracts and temporary agency work
    Addison, J.T.; Teixeira, P.; Grunau, P.; Bellmann, L.
  • Interactions terms in logit and probit models
    Ai, C.; Norton, E.C.
  • Fixed-term contracts as sorting mechanisms: evidence from job durations in West Germany
    Boockmann, B.; Hagen, T.
  • Do temporary workers affect workplace performance
    Bryson, A.
  • Temporary employment, demand volatility, and unions: firm level evidence
    Devicienti, F.; Naticchioni, P.; Ricci, A.
  • Has atypical work become typical in Germany?
    Eichhorst, W.; Tobsch, V.
  • The IAB establishment panel – methodological essentials and data quality
    Ellguth, P.; Kohaut, S.; Möller, I.
  • Dual labor markets at work: the impact of employers’ use of temporary agency work on regular workers’ job stability
    Hirsch, B.
  • The productivity effect of temporary agency work: evidence from German panel data
    Hirsch, B.; Müller, S.
  • Temporary agency work
    Houseman, S.N.
  • The cyclicality of the stepping-stone effect of temporary agency employment
    Jahn, E.J.; Rosholm, M.
  • Zero-inflated poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing
    Lambert, D.
  • The emergence of temporary work agencies
    Neugart, M.; Storrie, D.
  • The effects of trust on the preference for decentralized bargaining: an empirical study of managers and works councilors
    Nienhueser, W.; Hossfeld, H.
  • Flexibility, dual labor markets, and temporary employment: empirical evidence from German establishment data
    Pfeifer, C.
  • Leiharbeit und betriebliche Mitbestimmung
    Promberger, M.
  • What do unions do to temporary employment?
    Salvatori, A.