Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Women on boards, firms’ competitive advantage and its effect on ESG disclosure in Malaysia

Women on boards, firms’ competitive advantage and its effect on ESG disclosure in Malaysia The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of women on board moderated by firms’ competitive advantage on firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consists of 332 firm-year observations from the year 2012 to 2017 of 65 firms listed in Bursa Malaysia. To improve the robustness of this analysis, the authors adopt clustering techniques in the regression analysis. Sensitivity analysis is also conducted using two-stage least square regression and robust standard errors for panel regression with a cross-sectional dependence approach.FindingsThe findings of this research indicate that women on board encourage ESG and environmental disclosures. Nonetheless, in competitively advantaged firms, the authors find that the interaction between WOMENPER and COMADVANTAGE is negatively influencing ESG scores. However, no evidence is found to indicate that women on board in a competitively advantaged firm have an effect on the environmental scores of a firm.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings urge regulators to ensure the appointment of qualified and competent women on board, particularly in competitively advantage firms.Practical implicationsThough firms with more women on board are associated with better ESG disclosures and environmental disclosures, the author’s additional analysis found that this is less pronounced in competitively advantage firms. Since a number of the competitive firms are owned by family firms as well as government-linked firms, the appointment of women should not be based on directors’ affiliation, network and family relationships.Originality/valueTo the best of authors’ knowledge, this is one of the few studies which seek to investigate women’s appointment in competitive advantage firms. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Social Responsibility Journal Emerald Publishing

Women on boards, firms’ competitive advantage and its effect on ESG disclosure in Malaysia

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/women-on-boards-firms-competitive-advantage-and-its-effect-on-esg-40KjBHVsW0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1747-1117
eISSN
1747-1117
DOI
10.1108/srj-04-2021-0151
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of women on board moderated by firms’ competitive advantage on firms’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosures.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consists of 332 firm-year observations from the year 2012 to 2017 of 65 firms listed in Bursa Malaysia. To improve the robustness of this analysis, the authors adopt clustering techniques in the regression analysis. Sensitivity analysis is also conducted using two-stage least square regression and robust standard errors for panel regression with a cross-sectional dependence approach.FindingsThe findings of this research indicate that women on board encourage ESG and environmental disclosures. Nonetheless, in competitively advantaged firms, the authors find that the interaction between WOMENPER and COMADVANTAGE is negatively influencing ESG scores. However, no evidence is found to indicate that women on board in a competitively advantaged firm have an effect on the environmental scores of a firm.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings urge regulators to ensure the appointment of qualified and competent women on board, particularly in competitively advantage firms.Practical implicationsThough firms with more women on board are associated with better ESG disclosures and environmental disclosures, the author’s additional analysis found that this is less pronounced in competitively advantage firms. Since a number of the competitive firms are owned by family firms as well as government-linked firms, the appointment of women should not be based on directors’ affiliation, network and family relationships.Originality/valueTo the best of authors’ knowledge, this is one of the few studies which seek to investigate women’s appointment in competitive advantage firms.

Journal

Social Responsibility Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Apr 10, 2023

Keywords: Environmental; social and governance (ESG); Environmental disclosures; Women on boards; Competitive advantage

References

  • The causes of gender diversity in Malaysian large firms
    Abdullah, S.N.
  • Gender, ethnic and age diversity of the boards of large Malaysian firms and performance
    Abdullah, S.N.; Ku Ismail, K.N.I.
  • Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets
    Abdullah, S.N.; Ismail, K.N.I.K.; Nachum, L.
  • Investors want gender diversity on boards-but aren’t sure about targets
    Adams, M.
  • Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance
    Adams, R.B.; Ferreira, D.
  • Environmental disclosures by the Malaysian construction sector: exploring extent and quality
    Ahmad, N.N.N.; Mohamad, N.A.
  • Value creation, innovation practice, and competitive advantage
    Battisti, E.; Miglietta, N.; Nirino, N.; Diaz, M.V.
  • Do environment, social and governance performance impact credit ratings: a study from India
    Bhattacharya, S.; Sharma, D.
  • Status characteristics and social interaction
    Berger, J.; Cohen, B.P.; Zelditch Jr, M.
  • Sustainability reporting and bank performance after financial crisis: evidence from developed and developing countries
    Buallay, A.; Fadel, S.M.; Alajmi, J.; Saudagaran, S.
  • When women are on boards, male CEOs are less overconfident
    Chen, J.; Leung, W.S.; Song, W.; Goergen, M.
  • Corporate reputation and women on the board
    Brammer, S.; Millington, A.; Pavelin, S.
  • Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: a Meta-analysis
    Byron, K.; Post, C.
  • Corporate environmental responsibility and firm risk
    Cai, L.; Cui, J.; Jo, H.
  • Family ownership, board independence and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Hong Kong
    Chau, G.; Gray, S.J.
  • Corporate social responsibility and access to finance
    Cheng, B.; Ioannou, I.; Serafeim, G.
  • Corporate risk-taking and performance in Malaysia: the effect of board composition, political connections and sustainability practices
    Chong, L.L.; Ong, H.B.; Tan, S.H.
  • Securities commission
  • Voluntary non financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting
    Dhaliwal, D.; Li, O.; Tsang, A.; Yang, Y.
  • Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior
    Dowling, J.; Pfeffer, J.
  • Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent data
    Driscoll, J.; Kraay, A.C.
  • Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multinationals: moderating effects of geographic international diversification and fi nancial slack
    Duque-Grisales, E.; Aguilera-Caracuel, J.
  • The adoption of CSR practices in Egypt: internal efficiency or external legitimation?
    El-Bassiouny, D.; Letmathe, P.
  • ESG practices and the cost of debt: evidence from EU countries
    Eliwa, Y.; Aboud, A.; Saleh, A.
  • Report on Equality between Women and Men in the EU
  • ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies
    Friede, G.; Busch, T.; Bassen, A.
  • EVA versus earnings: does it matter which is more highly correlated with stock returns?
    Garvey, G.T.; Milbourn, T.T.
  • Social movement spillover: barriers to board gender diversity posed by contemporary governance reform
    Geletkanycz, M.A.
  • Evidence on competitive advantage and superior stock market performance
    Gjerde, Ø.; Knivsflå, K.; Sættem, F.
  • Women in business 2020: putting the blueprint into action
  • Board diversity and corporate social responsibility
    Harjoto, M.; Laksmana, I.; Lee, R.
  • Does audit committee substitute or complement other corporate governance mechanisms: evidence from an emerging economy
    Hassan, Y.; Hijazi, R.; Naser, K.
  • Information asymmetry in CSR reporting: publicly-traded versus privately-held firms
    Hickman, L.E.
  • Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence
    Hoechle, D.
  • Does an asset owner’s institutional setting influence its decision to sign the principles for responsible investment?
    Hoepner, A.G.; Majoch, A.A.; Zhou, X.Y.
  • Women on boards; global trends in gender diversity on corporate boards
    Lee, L.E.; Moscardi, M.
  • The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: the role of CEO power
    Li, Y.; Gong, M.; Zhang, X.Y.; Koh, L.
  • Effects of corporate environmental responsibility on financial performance: the moderating role of government regulation and organizational slack
    Li, D.; Cao, C.; Zhang, L.; Chen, X.; Ren, S.; Zhao, Y.
  • Sustainability reporting in ASEAN countries
    Loh, L.; Thomas, T.
  • Women in the boardroom: how do female directors of corporate boards perceive boardroom dynamics?
    Mathisen, G.E.; Ogaard, T.; Marnburg, E.
  • Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship
    Miller, T.; del Carmen Triana, M.
  • Effect of audit committees independence, board ethnicity and family ownership on earnings management in Malaysia
    Mohammad, W.M.W.; Wasiuzzaman, S.
  • Environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia
    Mohammad, W.M.W.; Wasiuzzaman, S.
  • Board and audit committee effectiveness, ethnic diversification and earnings management: a study of the Malaysian manufacturing sector: corporate governance
    Mohammad, W.M.W.; Wasiuzzaman, S.; Nik Salleh, N.M.Z.
  • ESG reporting–class actions, deterrence, and avoidance
    Murphy, D.; McGrath, D.
  • Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: a non-linear and disaggregated approach
    Nollet, J.; Filis, G.; Mitrokostas, E.
  • Firm value and social contribution with the interaction of corporate governance
    Noronha, C.; Guan, J.; Fan, J.
  • Report on the implementation of the OECD gender Recommendations - Some progress on gender equality but much left to do
  • Why does board gender diversity matter and how do we get there? The role of shareholder activism in deinstitutionalizing old boys’ networks
    Perrault, E.
  • Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels
    Pesaran, M.H.
  • Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches
    Petersen, M.A.
  • Women on boards and firm financial performance: a meta- analysis
    Post, C.; Byron, K.
  • Is voluntary external assurance relevant for the valuation of environmental reporting by firms in environmentally sensitive industries?
    Radhouane, I.; Nekhili, M.; Nagati, H.; Paché, G.
  • Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe
    Sassen, R.; Hinze, A.K.; Hardeck, I.
  • Public sentiment and the price of corporate sustainability
    Serafeim, G.
  • The impact of ESG disclosures and institutional ownership on market information asymmetry
    Siew, R.Y.; Balatbat, M.C.; , A.; Carmichael, D.G.
  • Research: when gender diversity makes firms more productive
    Turban, S.; Zhang, L.
  • Dealing with endogeneity bias: the generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data
    Ullah, S.; Akhtar, P.; Zaefarian, G.
  • Board gender diversity and transparency of environmental, social and governance disclosure: evidence from Malaysia
    Wasiuzzaman, S.; Mohammad, W.M.W.
  • Why and when female directors are less engaged in their board duties: an interface perspective
    Weck, M.K.; Veltrop, D.B.; Oehmichen, J.; Rink, F.
  • Corporate social responsibility and cost of capital: an empirical study of the Taiwan stock market
    Wu, S.W.; Lin, F.; Wu, C.M.
  • Addressing endogeneity by proposing novel instrumental variables in the nexus of sustainability reporting and firm financial performance: a step‐by‐step procedure for non‐experts
    Zahid, M.; Rahman, H.U.; Khan, M.; Ali, W.; Shad, F.
  • Boardroom gender diversity: implications for corporate sustainability disclosures in Malaysia
    Zahid, M.; Rahman, H.U.; Ali, W.; Khan, M.; Alharthi, M.; Qureshi, M.I.; Jan, A.
  • Firms and social responsibility: a review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance
    Gillan, S.L.; Koch, A.; Starks, L.T.
  • The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans
    Goss, A.; Roberts, G.
  • Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA
    Manita, R.; Bruna, M.G.; Dang, R.; Houanti, L.H.
  • Family ownership heterogeneity and audit committees independence and its implication towards the revised Malaysia code on corporate governance
    Mohammad, W.; Yusoff, W.F.; Nik Salleh, N.M.Z.
  • The ESG–financial performance relationship: does the type of employee board representation matter?
    Nekhili, M.; Boukadhaba, A.; Nagati, H.
  • Empirical investigations on boards, business characteristics, human capital and environmental reporting
    Said, R.; Omar, N.; Abdullah, W.N.
  • Royal Philips: a sustainable finance case study
    Schramade, W.; Schoenmaker, D.
  • Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores
    Tamimi, N.; Sebastianelli, R.