Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Gibb (2000)
Small and medium enterprise development: Borrowing from elsewhere? A research and development agendaJournal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 7
J. Watson, J. Everett (1999)
Small Business Failure Rates: Choice of Definition and Industry EffectsInternational Small Business Journal, 17
S. Slezak (2011)
What is Strategy
A. Abbott, K. Lawler, M. Ling (1998)
An empirical analysis of the effects of the Monopolies and Mergers Commission Beer Orders (1989) on the UK brewing industryApplied Economics, 30
Paul Milgrom, John Roberts (1992)
Economics, Organization and Management
M. Slade (1998)
Beer and the Tie: Did Divestiture of Brewer-Owned Public Houses Lead to Higher Beer Prices?The Economic Journal, 108
M. Waterson, P. Dobson (1996)
Vertical restraints and competition policy
C. Mason, K. McNally (1997)
Market Change, Distribution, and New Firm Formation and Growth: The Case of Real-Ale Breweries in the United KingdomEnvironment and Planning A, 29
Henry Mintzberg (1996)
Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management.Harvard business review, 74 4
M. Hergert, D. Morris (1989)
Accounting data for value chain analysisStrategic Management Journal, 10
A. Nucci (1999)
The Demography of Business ClosingsSmall Business Economics, 12
Both the Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA) and the Society of Independent Brewers (SIBA) argue that barriers to market access in the UK brewing industry disadvantage small brewers. They have been actively campaigning for a number of years for a tax concession (progressive beer duty or PBD) to alleviate the situation of small brewers. This paper argues that the disadvantages faced by small brewers are due to a complex monopsony in the beer industry, where the power of the distribution segment of the value chain is paramount. It outlines a model of the structure of the UK beer industry, and undertakes two types of empirical analysis to test the potential impact of PBD on the small brewery sector. The paper finds that control over distribution is the key to profitability and survival in the beer industry, and that small brewers with such control are most likely to benefit from PBD. The findings, however, also have relevance to the position of any small business facing a powerful distribution segment. Finally, for the issue of policy development, the paper indicates that the potential outcomes of a policy change may not be entirely those intended.
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2001
Keywords: Brewing industry; Taxation; Small firms; Value chain; Distribution
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.