Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/wikipedia-and-academic-peer-review-wikipedia-as-a-recognised-medium-jPZA8JwfRZ
References (96)
-
(2004)
An effective scientific publishing system for European research Europa: Gateway to the European Union, available at -
J. Tirole, J. Lerner (2002)
Some Simple Economics of Open SourceIO: Firm Structure
-
H. Kienle, D. Germán, S. Tilley, H. Müller (2004)
Intellectual property aspects of web publishing -
(2005)
Surviving Wikipedia: improving student search habits through information literacy and teacher collaboration -
Dennis Wilkinson, B. Huberman (2007)
Assessing the value of cooperation in WikipediaFirst Monday, 12
-
P. Magnus (2006)
Epistemology and the Wikipedia -
10.1177/1056492603258972
-
Besiki Stvilia, M. Twidale, L. Gasser, Linda Smith (2005)
INFORMATION QUALITY IN A COMMUNITY-BASED ENCYCLOPEDIA -
10.1086/341868
-
10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178
-
(1997)
Peer review: the holy office of modern science -
(2007)
Welcome to resources for authors " , available at: British Medical Journal http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/authors (accessed 22 -
(2004)
The romantic audience project: a wiki experiment -
S. Harnad (1999)
Free at Last: The Future of Peer-Reviewed JournalsD Lib Mag., 5
-
H. Holub, G. Tappeiner, Veronika Eberharter (1991)
The Iron Law of Important ArticlesSouthern Economic Journal, 58
-
Amy Justice, M. Cho, M. Winker, Jesse Berlin, D. Rennie (1998)
Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.JAMA, 280 3
-
Todd Bryant (2006)
Social Software in AcademiaEducause Quarterly, 29
-
J. Lerner, R. Merges (2003)
The Control of Technology Alliances: An Empirical Analysis of the Biotechnology IndustryJournal of Industrial Economics, 46
-
P. Rothwell, Christopher Martyn (2000)
Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience. Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?Brain : a journal of neurology, 123 ( Pt 9)
-
K. Kasten (1984)
Tenure and Merit Pay as Rewards for Research, Teaching, and Service at a Research University.The Journal of Higher Education, 55
-
M. Deuze (2006)
Ethnic media, community media and participatory cultureJournalism, 7
-
(2005)
Wikipedia: a work in progress -
Justin Johnson (2001)
Economics of Open Source Software -
W. Starbuck (2005)
How Much Better are the Most Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic PublicationSociology of Innovation eJournal
-
Shawndra Hill, F. Provost (2003)
The myth of the double-blind review?: author identification using only citationsSIGKDD Explor., 5
-
W. Starbuck (2003)
Where Is the Value in Peer Reviews -
Matt Barton (2005)
The future of rational-critical debate in online public spheresComputers and Composition, 22
-
(1994)
The ISI Impact Factor, Thomson Scientific, available at: http:// scientific.thomson.com/free/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactor -
(2006)
Readers smell conspiracy in lay's sudden death -
J. Giles (2005)
Internet encyclopaedias go head to headNature, 438
-
Richard Smith (2006)
Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and JournalsJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99
-
(2003)
Refereed journals: do they insure quality or enforce orthodoxy? -
Steven Goodman, Jesse Berlin, Suzanne Fletcher, R. Fletcher (1994)
Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal MedicineAnnals of Internal Medicine, 121
-
S. Lock (1988)
Fraud in medicineBritish Medical Journal (Clinical research ed.), 296
-
J. Voß (2005)
Measuring Wikipedia -
D. McGuinness, Honglei Zeng, Paulo Silva, Li Ding, Dhyanesh Narayanan, Mayukh Bhaowal (2006)
Investigations into Trust for Collaborative Information Repositories: A Wikipedia Case Study -
F. Viégas, M. Wattenberg, Kushal Dave (2004)
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizationsProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
-
C. Ang, Panayiotis Zaphiris, Stephanie Wilson (2005)
Wiki-supported Collaborative Narrative Construction in Game Communities -
(1991)
Reputation and Agency in the Historical Emergence of the Institutions of Open Science -
(2005)
Is an online encyclopedia, such as Wikipedia, immune from libel suits? " , Findlaw Legal News and Commentary -
Chen-Chi Chang (2006)
Business models for open access journals publishingOnline Inf. Rev., 30
-
Eric Raymond (1999)
The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary -
(2006)
Is Wikipedia's criticism justified? " , Random Ratiocination, available at: http://randomratio.blogspot.com/2006/07/is-wikipedia-criticism-justified -
D. Tapscott, Anthony Williams (2006)
Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything -
(2007)
Kenneth Lay, history The Free Encyclopedia, available at: http:// en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title ¼ Kenneth_Layandaction ¼ history -
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow (1994)
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies -
M. Mahoney (1977)
Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review systemCognitive Therapy and Research, 1
-
10.1001/jama.263.10.1355
-
T. Abate
Publishing scientific journals online -
Markel Tumlin, S. Harris, Heidi Buchanan, K. Schmidt, K. Johnson (2007)
Collectivism vs. Individualism in a Wiki World: Librarians Respond to Jaron Lanier's Essay “Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism”Serials Review, 33
-
Bo Leuf, Ward Cunningham (2001)
The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web -
(2007)
Main page – Citizendium -
C. Wennerås, Agnes Wold (1997)
Nepotism and sexism in peer-reviewNature, 387
-
(2002)
The slowdown of the economics publishing process -
L. Shiflett (1988)
A difficult balance: Editorial peer review in medicineJ. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 39
-
L. Howard, G. Wilkinson (1998)
Peer review and editorial decision-makingBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 173
-
(2003)
Incentives, Performance, and Academic Tenure, working papers -
L. Vučković-Dekić (2000)
Multiauthorship in three oncologic scientific journalsArchive of Oncology, 8
-
(2006)
Death by Wikipedia: the Kenneth Lay chronicles -
S. Lawrence (2001)
Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impactNature, 411
-
10.2307/1981445
-
Douglas Peters, S. Ceci (1982)
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted againBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 5
-
S. Groote, J. Dorsch (2001)
Online journals: impact on print journal usage.Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 89 4
-
Frederick Hecht, B. Hecht, A. Sandberg (1998)
The journal "impact factor": a misnamed, misleading, misused measure.Cancer genetics and cytogenetics, 104 2
-
A. Lih (2004)
Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource -
A. Regalado (1995)
Multiauthor papers on the rise.Science, 268 5207
-
(2007)
White Paper No. 1 – Tenure, available at: http://lilt.ilstu.edu/ jhreid/isuaaup/tenure.htm Inside Higher Education A stand against Wikipedia " , available at: http://insidehighered. com/news -
P. Ingwersen, B. Larsen (2005)
Proceedings of ISSI 2005 – The 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics: Stockholm, Sweden, July 24-28, 2005 -
S. Bryant, Andrea Forte, A. Bruckman (2005)
Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopediaProceedings of the 2005 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
-
Helen Chen, D. Cannon, J. Gabrio, L. Leifer, G. Toye, T. Bailey (2005)
Using Wikis and Weblogs to Support Reflective Learning in an Introductory Engineering Design Course -
G. Bull, G. Knezek, D. Gibson (2009)
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9
-
T. Bergstrom (2001)
Free Labor for Costly Journals -
10.1016/0166-0462(95)90033-0
-
J. Armstrong (1997)
Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovationScience and Engineering Ethics, 3
-
T. Abate (1997)
Special Publishing Article: Publishing scientific journals onlineBioScience, 47
-
Jo Oravec (2002)
Bookmarking the World: Weblog Applications in EducationJournal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 45
-
The Role and Design of Incentive Mechanisms in Online System, available at: www-static.cc.gatech.edu/ , aforte/ForteBruckmanWhyPeopleWrite -
T. Mcarthur (2006)
Citing, quoting, and critiquing the WikipediaEnglish Today, 22
-
M. Gardner, J. Bond (1990)
An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal.JAMA, 263 10
-
(2007)
available at: www.seedwiki.com/wiki/wikifish/wikifish.cfm Wikipedia (2007a), " Encyclopedia " , Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, available at: http://simple. wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia -
W. Cotter (1996)
Why Tenure Works, 82
-
R. Rosenzweig (2006)
Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the PastThe Journal of American History, 93
-
M. Wood, Martyn Roberts, Barbara Howell (2004)
The Reliability of Peer Reviews of Papers on Information SystemsJournal of Information Science, 30
-
Fiona Godlee, C. Gale, Christopher Martyn (1998)
Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA, 280 3
-
G. Harding, K. Taylor (2001)
Academic Assessment in the Carceral SocietyPharmacy Education, 1
-
H. Presser (2019)
From the authorAutomatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 42
-
George Walker (2006)
Envisioning the future of doctoral education : preparing stewards of the discipline Carnegie essays on the doctorate -
J. Maddox (1992)
Conflicts of interest declaredNature, 360
-
F. Hayek (1945)
The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society -
(2005)
Newsmaker: in search of the wikipedia prankster " , available at: http:// news.com.com/In þ search þ of þ the þ Wikipedia þ prankster/2008-1029_3-5995977. html?tag ¼ st -
(2007)
Traffic Rankings: www.wikipedia.org, available at: www.alexa.com/data/details/ main?q ¼ andurl -
J. Dalle, P. David (2005)
The Allocation of Software Development Resources In ‘Open Source’ Production ModeIndustrial Organization
-
(2007)
Wiki The Free Encyclopedia, available at -
Andrea Forte, A. Bruckman (2005)
Why Do People Write for Wikipedia? Incentives to Contribute to Open-Content Publishing -
R. Horton (2002)
Postpublication criticism and the shaping of clinical knowledge.JAMA, 287 21
-
D. Horrobin (1996)
Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research?The Lancet, 348
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 1468-4527
- DOI
- 10.1108/14684520810865994
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to engage in a thought experiment, exploring the use of Wikipedia or similar content‐malleable systems for the review and dissemination of academic knowledge. Design/methodology/approach – By looking at other sources, the paper considers the current state of the academic peer‐review process, discusses Wikipedia and reflects on dynamic content creation and management applications currently in use in academia. Findings – The traditional peer review process must be updated to match the rapid creation and diffusion of knowledge that characterises the 21st century. The Wikipedia concept is a potential model for more rapid and reliable dissemination of scholarly knowledge. The implications of such a concept would have a dramatic effect on the academic community. Originality/value – This paper promotes a radical idea for changing the methods by which academic knowledge is both constructed and disseminated.
Journal
Online Information Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 22, 2008
Keywords: Peer review; Knowledge creation; Publications; Online operations