Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Sahlman (1990)
The structure and governance of venture-capital organizationsJournal of Financial Economics, 27
A. Damodaran (2009)
Valuing Young, Start-Up and Growth Companies: Estimation Issues and Valuation ChallengesEconometrics: Econometric & Statistical Methods - General eJournal
Y. Amihud, H. Mendelson (1986)
Asset pricing and the bid-ask spreadJournal of Financial Economics, 17
(1988)
Stocks, bonds, bill, and inflation
J.K. Smith, R.L. Smith
Entrepreneurial Finance
Andrew Metrick, A. Yasuda (2006)
Venture Capital and the Finance of InnovationFinance Educator: Courses
Purpose – Venture capitalists typically use discount rates in the range of 30‐70 percent. During the startup stage of venture‐capital financing, discount rates between 50 and 70 percent are common. The discount rate decreases from the first through fourth stage: from 60 to 30 percent. These rates of return are high compared to historical returns on common stocks or small stocks (12.1 and 17.8 percent, respectively). Such high discount rates cannot also be explained in the context of any existing asset pricing theory; that is, any reasonable risk‐adjusted discount rates are not consistent with discount rates in the order of 30‐60 percent. The paper provides a rational economic explanation why venture capitalists (VC) use such high discount rates. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Let the discount rate of a venture project be 15 percent; this discount rate depends on the systematic risk of the cash flows from the project given that the project is successful. Using the procedure, a VC who estimates the probability of eventual success of the project between 60 and 40 percent will impose a discount rate between 42 and 74 percent. These discount rates are quite similar to the discount rates charged by VC in their startup and first stages. Findings – The high rates of return charged by VC reflect the fact that not all their projects succeed in that they have no net cash‐inflows. Adjusting for the probability of success of the project provides estimates of discount rates comparable. Originality/value – The paper argues that reported rates of return of common stock are relevant for projects that have succeeded in that they have net cash‐inflows.
The Journal of Risk Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 28, 2014
Keywords: IPO; Venture capital; Cost of capital; Exit via acquisition; Venture risk
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.