Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Who will lead the physicians unwilling to lead? Institutional logics and double-bind situations in health care leadership

Who will lead the physicians unwilling to lead? Institutional logics and double-bind situations... Purpose– Health care organizations are increasingly demanded to balance the institutional logic of “medical professionalism” and “business-like health care,” that is, to both recognize physicians’ professional expertise while locating it in a wider social, economic, and political organizational setting. The purpose of this paper is to examine the implications from this shift in terms of leadership work in health care organizations. Design/methodology/approach– Case study methodology including interviews with 15 residents in Swedish health care organizations. Findings– A study of the willingness of residents to take on leadership positions show that leadership roles are treated as what is potentially hindering the acquisition of the know-how, skills, and expertise demanded to excel in the clinical work. Consequently, taking on leadership positions in the future was relatively unattractive for the residents. In order to overcome such perceived conflict between professional skill development and leadership roles, top management of health care organizations must help residents overcome such beliefs, or other professional groups may increasingly populate leadership positions, a scenario not fully endorsed by the community of physicians. Originality/value– The paper demonstrates how complementary or completing institutional logics are influencing debates and identities on the “shop floors” of organizations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Leadership & Organization Development Journal Emerald Publishing

Who will lead the physicians unwilling to lead? Institutional logics and double-bind situations in health care leadership

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/who-will-lead-the-physicians-unwilling-to-lead-institutional-logics-20yLO86L1K
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0143-7739
DOI
10.1108/LODJ-10-2012-0137
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose– Health care organizations are increasingly demanded to balance the institutional logic of “medical professionalism” and “business-like health care,” that is, to both recognize physicians’ professional expertise while locating it in a wider social, economic, and political organizational setting. The purpose of this paper is to examine the implications from this shift in terms of leadership work in health care organizations. Design/methodology/approach– Case study methodology including interviews with 15 residents in Swedish health care organizations. Findings– A study of the willingness of residents to take on leadership positions show that leadership roles are treated as what is potentially hindering the acquisition of the know-how, skills, and expertise demanded to excel in the clinical work. Consequently, taking on leadership positions in the future was relatively unattractive for the residents. In order to overcome such perceived conflict between professional skill development and leadership roles, top management of health care organizations must help residents overcome such beliefs, or other professional groups may increasingly populate leadership positions, a scenario not fully endorsed by the community of physicians. Originality/value– The paper demonstrates how complementary or completing institutional logics are influencing debates and identities on the “shop floors” of organizations.

Journal

Leadership & Organization Development Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 3, 2016

There are no references for this article.