Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L.A. Ponemon
Comments – whistle‐blowing as an internal control mechanism: individual and organizational considerations
J. Near, M. Miceli (1985)
Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowingJournal of Business Ethics, 4
Mary Brabeck (1984)
Ethical characteristics of whistle blowersJournal of Research in Personality, 18
M. Oliverio (2001)
Internal control—integrated framework: who is responsible?Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12
K.L. Hooks, S.E. Kaplan, J.J. Jr Schultz
Enhancing communication to assist in fraud prevention and detection
M.P. Miceli, J.P. Near
The relationship among beliefs, organizational position and whistle‐blowing status: a discriminant analysis
J.P. Near, M.P. Miceli
The Internal Auditor’s Ultimate Responsibility: The Reporting of Sensitive Issues
David Greenberger, M. Miceli, Debra Cohen (1987)
Oppositionists and group norms: The reciprocal influence of whistle-blowers and co-workersJournal of Business Ethics, 6
Treadway Commission
Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting
Blue Ribbon Committee
Report and Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees
COSO
Internal Control‐integrated Framework
Joseph Schultz, Karen Hooks (1998)
The Effect of Relationship and Reward on Reports of WrongdoingAuditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 17
M. Miceli, J. Near (1984)
The Relationships Among Beliefs, Organizational Position, and Whistle-Blowing Status:
M. Zmijewski (1984)
METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES RELATED TO THE ESTIMATION OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS PREDICTION MODELSJournal of Accounting Research, 22
Whistle-blowing can play an important role in the internal control environment of an organization, and internal auditors are its natural outlets. This study examines whistle-blowing complaints received by internal auditors based on survey responses from 129 chief internal auditors of US manufacturing companies. Within the past two years, 71 percent of chief internal auditors received whistle-blowing complaints, 65 percent of which were found to be true upon investigation. The receipt of whistle-blowing complaints was positively associated with involvement of internal auditing in monitoring compliance with the corporate code of conduct, and with audit committee support of internal auditing (as evidenced by audit committee involvement in decisions to dismiss the chief internal auditor). These results are consistent with recent calls by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations and others for public companies to maintain and enforce a code of conduct, and by the Blue Ribbon Committee and others about the need for audit committees to deal proactively with internal and external auditors.
Managerial Auditing Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 1, 2003
Keywords: Internal audit; Auditors; Monitoring; Codes of practice
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.