Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Oreg, M. Vakola, A. Armenakis (2011)
Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational ChangeThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47
S. Oreg (2006)
Personality, context, and resistance to organizational changeEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15
A. Strauss, J. Corbin (1993)
Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Contemporary Sociology, 21
T. Baker (1987)
Doing Social Research
D. Herold, D. Fedor, Steven Caldwell (2007)
Beyond change management: a multilevel investigation of contextual and personal influences on employees' commitment to change.The Journal of applied psychology, 92 4
S. Robinson, D. Rousseau (1994)
Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the normJournal of Organizational Behavior, 15
C. Argyris (1961)
Understanding organizational behaviorAmerican Sociological Review, 22
C. Agócs (1997)
Institutionalized Resistance to Organizational Change: Denial, Inaction and RepressionJournal of Business Ethics, 16
D. Bouckenooghe (2010)
Positioning Change Recipients’ Attitudes Toward Change in the Organizational Change LiteratureThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 46
Richard Guzzo, Katherine Noonan, Efrat Elron (1994)
Expatriate managers and the psychological contract.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79
(2003)
Analysis: practices, principles and processes
(2007)
Readiness for organizational change: the systematic development of a scale
Jonathan Johnson, A. O'Leary-Kelly (2003)
The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: not all social exchange violations are created equalJournal of Organizational Behavior, 24
J. Bartunek, D. Rousseau, J. Rudolph (2006)
Sensemaking, Emotion, and Assessments of an Organizational Change Initiated by Others
David Stanley, John Meyer, Laryssa Topolnytsky (2005)
Employee Cynicism and Resistance to Organizational ChangeJournal of Business and Psychology, 19
D. Rousseau, Snehal Tijoriwala (1999)
What's a good reason to change? Motivated reasoning and social accounts in promoting organizational change.Journal of Applied Psychology, 84
H. Levinson, C. Price, K. Munden, H. Mandl, C. Solley (1962)
Men, management, and mental health
D. Skarlicki, R. Folger, Paul Tesluk (1999)
Personality as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Fairness and RetaliationAcademy of Management Journal, 42
T. Ostrom (1969)
The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5
S. Heuvel, R. Schalk (2009)
The relationship between fulfilment of the psychological contract and resistance to change during organizational transformationsSocial Science Information, 48
A. Tekleab, R. Takeuchi, M. Taylor (2005)
Extending the Chain of Relationships Among Organizational Justice, Social Exchange, and Employee Reactions: The Role of Contract ViolationsAcademy of Management Journal, 48
D. Rousseau (1998)
The ‘problem’ of the psychological contract consideredJournal of Organizational Behavior, 19
Marie Kavanagh, N. Ashkanasy (2006)
The Impact of Leadership and Change Management Strategy on Organizational Culture and Individual Acceptance of Change During a MergerLRN: Cross-Cultural Studies (Topic)
D. Guest (2004)
The Psychology of the Employment Relationship: An Analysis Based on the Psychological ContractApplied Psychology, 53
D. Rousseau (2003)
Extending the Psychology of the Psychological ContractJournal of Management Inquiry, 12
Rune Lines (2005)
The Structure and Function of Attitudes Toward Organizational ChangeHuman Resource Development Review, 4
A. Strauss (1992)
Basics Of Qualitative Research
J. Willis (2007)
Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches
Scott Lester, Jill Kickul, T. Bergmann (2007)
Managing employee perceptions of the psychological contract over time: the role of employer social accounts and contract fulfillmentJournal of Organizational Behavior, 28
J. Pate, G. Martin, H. Staines (2000)
Exploring the relationship between psychological contracts and organizational change: a process model and case study evidenceStrategic Change, 9
S. Robinson (1996)
Trust and Breach of the Psychological ContractAdministrative Science Quarterly, 41
Jill Kickul, Scott Lester, Elizabeth Belgio (2004)
Attitudinal and Behavioral Outcomes of Psychological Contract BreachInternational Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 4
S. Elias (2009)
Employee Commitment in Times of Change: Assessing the Importance of Attitudes Toward Organizational Change †Journal of Management, 35
D. Dougherty (2004)
Organizing Practices in Services: Capturing Practice-Based Knowledge for InnovationStrategic Organization, 2
(1965)
Organizational Psychology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Jingqiu Chen, Lei Wang (2007)
Locus of control and the three components of commitment to changePersonality and Individual Differences, 42
Hao Zhao, Sandy Wayne, Brian Glibkowski, Jesus Bravo (2007)
THE IMPACT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT BREACH ON WORK‐RELATED OUTCOMES: A META‐ANALYSISPersonnel Psychology, 60
Guillermo Dabos, D. Rousseau (2004)
Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 1
Sebastian Ehrlichmann (2016)
Attitude Structure And Function
W. Turnley, D. Feldman (2000)
Re‐examining the effects of psychological contract violations: unmet expectations and job dissatisfaction as mediatorsJournal of Organizational Behavior, 21
C. Freese (2007)
Organizational change and the dynamics of psychological contracts : A longitudinal study
Connie Wanberg, Joseph Banas (2000)
Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace.The Journal of applied psychology, 85 1
R. Bagozzi (1978)
The Construct Validity Of The Affective, Behavioral, And Cognitive Components Of Attitude By Analysis Of Covariance Structures.Multivariate behavioral research, 13 1
W. Turnley, M. Bolino, Scott Lester, J. Bloodgood (2003)
The Impact of Psychological Contract Fulfillment on the Performance of In-Role and Organizational Citizenship BehaviorsJournal of Management, 29
R. Folger, D. Skarlicki (1999)
Unfairness and resistance to change: hardship as mistreatmentJournal of Organizational Change Management, 12
D. Rousseau (1990)
New hire perceptions of their own and their employer's obligations: A study of psychological contractsJournal of Organizational Behavior, 11
D. Elizur, L. Guttman (1976)
The Structure of Attitudes toward Work and Technological Change within an OrganizationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 21
R. Schalk, J. Soeters (2008)
Psychological contracts across the world. Cultural agreements and disagreements
E. Morrison, S. Robinson (1997)
WHEN EMPLOYEES FEEL BETRAYED: A MODEL OF HOW PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION DEVELOPSAcademy of Management Review, 22
D. Rousseau (1996)
Changing the deal while keeping the peopleAcademy of Management Perspectives, 10
D. McCarthy, Sheila Puffer, R. May, D. Ledgerwood, Wayne Stewart (2008)
Overcoming Resistance to Change in Russian OrganizationsOrganizational Dynamics, 37
(1985)
Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage Publications
S. Oreg (2003)
Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 4
S. Piderit (2000)
Rethinking Resistance and Recognizing Ambivalence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Toward an Organizational ChangeAcademy of Management Review, 25
Daniel Katz (1955)
Handbook of Social Psychology.Psychological Bulletin
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a model on how business managers perceive that an employee’s psychological contract influences his or her attitude toward an organizational change. More specifically, it aims to provide insight into the managerial views on: first, the affective, behavioral and cognitive responses of employees toward organizational change; second, the pre-change and change antecedents of these responses; and third, the role of the psychological contract as a pre-change antecedent. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from in-depth interviews with 39 human resource directors, change managers and management consultants in eight European countries. Based on detailed grounded theory-driven analyses of the qualitative data, a conceptual model was developed. Findings – Based on the grounded theory analysis, a model emerged that positions the individual change perception and individual answer to the “what’s in it for me?” question as central determinants of an employee’s attitude toward change. Moreover, the model distinguishes between “influencing” variables that shape the employees’ change perception, and “overruling” variables that can potentially reverse the change perceptions. Practical implications – A strong emphasis on managing the employment relationship by fulfilling mutual obligations and by creating trust will yield more constructive responses to organizational change than focussing on managing an organizational change as an independent event. Originality/value – As one of the first in its field, this study provides insight in the sense-making processes during organizational change, while adopting a managerial perspective. A grounded theory approach by means of interviewing, serves as a first step toward better understanding of the development of employees’ affective, behavioral and cognitive responses to organizational change.
Journal of Organizational Change Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 11, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.