Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
The past few years have seen a plethora of antimoney laundering initiatives. One of the latest is the socalled Global Anti Money Laundering Guidelines for Private Banking formulated at a meeting in Wolfsberg, Switzerland the guidelines. Other initiatives have been government led. The guidelines were formulated by representatives from the banking industry in collaboration with Transparency International and Professor Mark Pieth, and launched on 29th October, 2000. They have received a mixed reception in the press. Some have given them a warm welcome, saying they fill a hole left by government regulators. Others are less enthusiastic, dismissing them as window dressing to reduce public and regulatory pressure on banks caught out in a series of embarrassing moneylaundering scandals, such as Salinas, Bank of New York and most recently Abacha. There is little doubt that such pressure is part of the reason for the guidelines and they seem to have generated an impression that banks are facing up to this issue, thus reducing pressure.
Journal of Money Laundering Control – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 1, 2001
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.