Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

What makes a helpful online review? Empirical evidence on the effects of review and reviewer characteristics

What makes a helpful online review? Empirical evidence on the effects of review and reviewer... The reviews submitted by users are the foundation of user-generated content (UGC) platforms. However, the rapid growth of users brings the problems of information overload and spotty content, which makes it necessary for UGC platforms to screen out reviews that are really helpful to users. The authors put forward in this paper the factors influencing review helpfulness voting from the perspective of review characteristics and reviewer characteristics.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses 8,953 reviews from 20 movies listed on Douban.com with variables focusing on review characteristics and reviewer characteristics that affect review helpfulness. To verify the six hypotheses proposed in the study, Stata 14 was used to perform tobit regression.FindingsFindings show that review helpfulness is significantly influenced by the length, valence, timeliness and deviation rating of the reviews. The results also underlie that a review submitted by a reviewer who has more followers and experience is more affected by review characteristics.Originality/valuePrevious literature has discussed the factors that affect the helpfulness of reviews; however, the authors have established a new model that explores more comprehensive review characteristics and the moderating effect reviewer characteristics have on helpfulness. In this empirical research, the authors selected a UGC community in China as the research object. The UGC community may encourage users to write more helpful reviews by highlighting the characteristics of users. Users in return can use this to establish his/her image in the community. Future research can explore more variables related to users.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0186. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Online Information Review Emerald Publishing

What makes a helpful online review? Empirical evidence on the effects of review and reviewer characteristics

Luo, Lijuan; Duan, Siqi; Shang, Shanshan; Pan, Yu
Online Information Review , Volume 45 (3): 19 – May 10, 2021
Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/what-makes-a-helpful-online-review-empirical-evidence-on-the-effects-ayoXwf8bZh
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1468-4527
DOI
10.1108/oir-05-2020-0186
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The reviews submitted by users are the foundation of user-generated content (UGC) platforms. However, the rapid growth of users brings the problems of information overload and spotty content, which makes it necessary for UGC platforms to screen out reviews that are really helpful to users. The authors put forward in this paper the factors influencing review helpfulness voting from the perspective of review characteristics and reviewer characteristics.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses 8,953 reviews from 20 movies listed on Douban.com with variables focusing on review characteristics and reviewer characteristics that affect review helpfulness. To verify the six hypotheses proposed in the study, Stata 14 was used to perform tobit regression.FindingsFindings show that review helpfulness is significantly influenced by the length, valence, timeliness and deviation rating of the reviews. The results also underlie that a review submitted by a reviewer who has more followers and experience is more affected by review characteristics.Originality/valuePrevious literature has discussed the factors that affect the helpfulness of reviews; however, the authors have established a new model that explores more comprehensive review characteristics and the moderating effect reviewer characteristics have on helpfulness. In this empirical research, the authors selected a UGC community in China as the research object. The UGC community may encourage users to write more helpful reviews by highlighting the characteristics of users. Users in return can use this to establish his/her image in the community. Future research can explore more variables related to users.Peer reviewThe peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0186.

Journal

Online Information Review – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 10, 2021

Keywords: Online review helpfulness; Extreme rating; Review valence; Timeliness; Moderator analysis

References

  • Sometimes it just feels right: the differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent product information
    Adaval, R.
  • Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially
    Ariely, D.; Bracha, A.; Meier, S.
  • Bad is stronger than good
    Baumeister, R.F.; Bratslavsky, E.; Finkenauer, C.; Vohs, K.D.
  • Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: a review and directions for future research
    Berger, J.
  • Exploring determinants of voting for the “helpfulness” of online user reviews: a text mining approach
    Cao, Q.; Duan, W.; Gan, Q.
  • Quality evaluation of product reviews using an information quality framework
    Chen, C.C.; Tseng, Y.D.
  • Social influence's impact on reader perceptions of online reviews
    Cheng, Y.H.; Ho, H.Y.
  • The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews
    Chevalier, J.A.; Mayzlin, D.
  • Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites
    Chu, S.C.; Kim, Y.
  • Understanding review helpfulness as a function of reviewer reputation, review rating, and review depth
    Chua, A.Y.; Banerjee, S.
  • People rely Less on consumer reviews for experiential than material purchases
    Dai, H.; Chan, C.; Mogilner, C.
  • Vote or not? How various information cues affect helpfulness voting of online reviews
    Deng, W.; Yi, M.; Lu, Y.
  • Investigating the effects of textual reviews from consumers and critics on movie sales
    Deng, T.
  • The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales—an empirical investigation of the movie industry
    Duan, W.; Gu, B.; Whinston, A.B.
  • An empirical investigation of self-selection bias and factors influencing review helpfulness
    Einar, B.; Havro, L.J.; Moen, O.
  • When are extreme ratings more helpful? Empirical evidence on the moderating effects of review characteristics and product type
    Filieri, R.; Raguseo, E.; Vitari, C.
  • How online product reviews affect retail sales: a meta-analysis
    Floyd, K.; Freling, R.; Alhoqail, S.; Cho, H.Y.; Freling, T.
  • Effects of membership tier on user content generation behaviors: evidence from online reviews
    Fu, D.; Hong, Y.; Wang, K.; Fan, W.
  • Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: mining text and reviewer characteristics
    Ghose, A.; Ipeirotis, P.G.
  • Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication
    Godes, D.; Mayzlin, D.
  • Knowledge contribution behavior in online Q&A communities: an empirical investigation
    Guan, T.; Wang, L.; Jin, J.; Song, X.
  • What makes population perception of review helpfulness: an information processing perspective
    Guo, B.; Zhou, S.
  • Consumer engagement with eWOM on social media: the role of social capital
    Gvili, Y.; Levy, S.
  • An empirical study on inline impact factors of reviews usefulness based on movie reviews
    Han, A.; Hao, L.; Jifan, R.
  • Social media analytics: Unveiling the value, impact and implications of social media analytics for the management and use of online information
    He, W.; Xu, G.
  • Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective
    Herr, P.M.; Kardes, F.R.; Kim, J.
  • Understanding the determinants of online review helpfulness: a meta-analytic investigation
    Hong, H.; Xu, D.; Wang, G.A.; Fan, W.
  • Exploring the effects of online customer reviews, regulatory focus, and product type on purchase intention: perceived justice as a moderator
    Hsu, C.L.; Yu, L.C.; Chang, K.C.
  • Overcoming the J-shaped distribution of product reviews
    Hu, N.; Zhang, J.; Pavlou, P.A.
  • A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness
    Huang, A.H.; Chen, K.; Yen, D.C.; Tran, T.P.
  • Opinion spam and analysis
    Jindal, N.; Liu, B.
  • Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: the interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content
    Korfiatis, N.; GarcíA-Bariocanal, E.; SáNchez-Alonso, S.
  • Factors contributing to the helpfulness of online hotel reviews: does manager response play a role?
    Kwok, L.; Xie, K.L.
  • The role of status seeking in online communities: giving the gift of experience
    Lampel, J.; Bhalla, A.
  • Predicting the helpfulness of online reviews using multilayer perceptron neural networks
    Lee, S.; Choeh, J.Y.
  • The influence of social capital in an online community on online review quality in China
    Li, Q.; Cui, J.; Gao, Y.
  • How review sentiment and readability affect online peer evaluation votes?–an examination combining reviewer's social identity and social network
    Li, H.; Zhang, Z.; Janakiraman, R.; Meng, F.
  • What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites
    Liu, Z.; Park, S.
  • Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue
    Liu, Y.
  • How regulatory orientation and feelings of gratitude shape online review helpfulness
    Mafael, A.
  • Can we trace back hotel online reviews' characteristics using gamification features?
    Moro, S.; Ramos, P.; Esmerado, J.; Jalali, S.M.J.
  • Research note: what makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com
    Mudambi, S.M.; Schuff, D.
  • Determinants of writing positive and negative electronic word-of-mouth: empirical evidence for two types of expectation confirmation
    Nam, K.; Baker, J.; Ahmad, N.; Goo, J.
  • Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities
    Ott, M.; Cardie, C.; Hancock, J.
  • Born unequal: a study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews
    Pan, Y.; Zhang, J.Q.
  • eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement
    Park, D.H.; Lee, J.
  • Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews
    Park, S.; Nicolau, J.L.
  • Understanding voluntary knowledge provision and content contribution through a social-media-based prediction market: a field experiment
    Qiu, L.; Kumar, S.
  • Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: an exploratory investigation across three services categories
    Racherla, P.; Friske, W.
  • The impact of online product reviews on product returns
    Sahoo, N.; Dellarocas, C.; Srinivasan, S.
  • Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web
    Sen, S.; Lerman, D.
  • What drives the helpfulness of online product reviews? From stars to facts and emotions
    Siering, M.; Muntermann, J.
  • Word of mouth: measuring the power of individual messages
    Sweeney, J.C.; Soutar, G.N.; Mazzarol, T.
  • Peer-to-peer word-of-mouth: word-of-mouth extended to group online exchange
    Toder-Alon, A.; Brunel, F.F.
  • Word-of-mouth rhetorics in social media talk
    Toder-Alon, A.; Brunel, F.F.; Fournier, S.
  • The asymmetric effect of review valence on numerical rating
    Tsao, H.Y.; Chen, M.Y.; Lin, H.C.K.; Ma, Y.C.
  • The impact of emotions on the helpfulness of movie reviews
    Ullah, R.; Zeb, A.; Kim, W.
  • What makes a helpful online review? A meta-analysis of review characteristics
    Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Yao, T.
  • Listening to strangers: whose responses are valuable, how valuable are they, and why?
    Weiss, A.M.; Lurie, N.H.; MacInnis, D.J.
  • In search of negativity bias: an empirical study of perceived helpfulness of online reviews
    Wu, P.F.
  • Why posters contribute different content in their positive online reviews: a social information-processing perspective
    Yan, L.; Wang, X.
  • An empirical study of the impact of review content on online reviews helpfulness in e-commerce
    Yan, J.Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, L.
  • Experiential goods with network externalities effects: an empirical study of online rating system
    Yang, J.; Mai, E.S.
  • What makes a helpful online review?—the perspective of information adoption and social network
    Yin, G.; Liu, W.; Zhu, S.
  • Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews
    Yin, D.; Bond, S.D.; Zhang, H.
  • Research note—when do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth
    Yin, D.; Mitra, S.; Zhang, H.
  • An investigation of online review helpfulness based on movie reviews
    Zhiming, L.; Li, H.; Lu, L.
  • An empirical study of how third-party websites influence the feedback mechanism between online word-of-mouth and retail sales
    Zhou, W.; Duan, W.
  • Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: the moderating role of product and consumer characteristics
    Zhu, F.; Zhang, X.
  • Is this opinion leader's review useful? Peripheral cues for online review helpfulness
    Zhu, L.; Yin, G.; He, W.
  • The impacts of evaluation duration and product types on review extremity
    Zhu, H.; Tu, R.; Feng, W.; Xu, J.
  • Good discounts earn good reviews in return? Effects of price promotion on online restaurant reviews
    Zhu, D.H.; Zhang, Z.J.; Chang, Y.P.; Liang, S.