Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Raine Isaksson, R. Garvare (2003)
Measuring sustainable development using process modelsManagerial Auditing Journal, 18
D. Crowther, G. Aras (2007)
Sustainable corporate social responsibility and the value chain.
D. Crowther, R. Jatana (2005)
Modern epics and corporate well-being.
D. Crowther (2003)
Creating Shareholder Value
D. Windsor (2001)
THE FUTURE OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9
J. Child (1974)
MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE PART IJournal of Management Studies, 11
C. Emmanuel, D. Otley, K. Merchant (1990)
Accounting for Management Control
A. Rappaport (1992)
CFOs and strategists: forging a common framework.Harvard business review, 70 3
James Heard, William Bolce (1981)
The political significance of corporate social reporting in the United States of AmericaAccounting Organizations and Society, 6
J. Seth
The method of ethics.
T. Brignall, L. Fitzgerald, R. Johnston, R. Silvestro (1992)
Performance Measurement in Service Businesses
D. Crowther, A. Gomez (2005)
Is lying the best way of telling the truth
Joseph Mcguire, O. Williamson (1971)
Corporate Control and Business Behavior.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17
H. Titus, M. Smith, R. Nolan (1970)
Living issues in philosophy
Branka Mraović (2006)
Lemmings in the Casino: Metamorphoses of the Crises of Capitalist Accumulation ‐ Threats and 238 Opportunities of the Current StageSocial Responsibility Journal, 2
D. Crowther, G. Aras (2007)
Is the global economy sustainable
S. Schaltegger, K. Müller, Henriette Hindrichsen (1996)
Corporate Environmental Accounting
M. Mcluhan, Quentin Fiore, Jerome Agel (1968)
War and Peace in the Global Village
J. Coates (1993)
Corporate performance evaluation in multinationals
J. Child (1975)
MANAGERIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPANY PERFORMANCE‐PART II. A CONTINGENCY ANALYSISJournal of Management Studies, 12
M. Jensen, W. Meckling (1994)
The Nature of ManJournal of Financial Abstracts eJournal
M. Briers, M. Hirst (1990)
The role of budgetary information in performance evaluationAccounting Organizations and Society, 15
H. Belloc (2002)
The Free Press
Lynne Andersson, Christine Pearson (1999)
Tit for Tat? The Spiraling Effect of Incivility in the WorkplaceAcademy of Management Review, 24
D. Crowther, A. Gomez (2006)
I will if you will: risk, feelings and emotion in the workplace.
T. Cowen (1997)
Markets in the Firm
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to argue that the main ontological position of modern capitalism, founded on the philosophy of utilitarianism, derived of course from the work of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, is fundamentally flawed as it ignores power inequalities and assumes that the economic fiction of perfect competition can actually exist. Design/methodology/approach – Nevertheless it provides a legitimating mechanism for modern capitalism and the operation of firms within a market economy. More significantly, from the viewpoint of this paper, is the problem caused by the naïve assumption that the firm as nexus of treaties is sufficient to negotiate the contracts between the various stakeholders. This is significantly inadequate because it ignores the aspect of trust between the parties – the focus of the paper. Findings – In this paper it is argued that the sustainability of a firm is not predicated in the negotiated contracts it enacts but rather in the underlying trust which is implied and that one of the problems of the modern firm is that this trust has been negated in the drive for efficiency and shareholder value. The purpose of this paper therefore is to explore the nature of trust between the various stakeholders to the social contract which the firm enacts, paying particular attention to the involuntary stakeholders. In doing so, the role of trust in each aspect of sustainability identified in a previous paper is analysed and consider whether it is necessary for each stakeholder or just they key ones, or whether it is different for each aspect? In doing so, particular attention is paid to involuntary stakeholders. Originality/value – This argument has implications for every business in managing its stakeholder relations.
Social Responsibility Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 1, 2007
Keywords: Economic sustainability; Trust; Utilitarianism; Stakeholder analysis; Economic theory; Capitalist systems
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.