Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

What drives team learning: core conditions and paths

What drives team learning: core conditions and paths The purpose of this study is to analyze the configurational effect of transformational leadership, team conflict, team cohesion and psychological safety on team learning.Design/methodology/approachThe questionnaire and two different data sources (team members and team leaders) were used as data collection strategy. Based on a sample of 82 teams, qualitative comparative analysis in its fuzzy set variant was used to test the model.FindingsThe findings of this study reveal that three important paths explain team learning: the presence of transformational leadership, task cohesion and psychological safety with the absence of relationship conflict; the presence of transformational leadership, social and task cohesion and psychological safety; and the presence of transformational leadership, social and task cohesion with the absence of relationship and task conflict.Originality/valueOverall, the findings suggest that the presence of transformational leadership, team cohesion and psychological safety and the absence of conflict are important conditions for team learning to occur, as well as that more than one configurations of antecedent factors drive team learning. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Workplace Learning Emerald Publishing

What drives team learning: core conditions and paths

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/what-drives-team-learning-core-conditions-and-paths-0tANGmsRHw

References (72)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1366-5626
eISSN
1366-5626
DOI
10.1108/jwl-06-2022-0079
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the configurational effect of transformational leadership, team conflict, team cohesion and psychological safety on team learning.Design/methodology/approachThe questionnaire and two different data sources (team members and team leaders) were used as data collection strategy. Based on a sample of 82 teams, qualitative comparative analysis in its fuzzy set variant was used to test the model.FindingsThe findings of this study reveal that three important paths explain team learning: the presence of transformational leadership, task cohesion and psychological safety with the absence of relationship conflict; the presence of transformational leadership, social and task cohesion and psychological safety; and the presence of transformational leadership, social and task cohesion with the absence of relationship and task conflict.Originality/valueOverall, the findings suggest that the presence of transformational leadership, team cohesion and psychological safety and the absence of conflict are important conditions for team learning to occur, as well as that more than one configurations of antecedent factors drive team learning.

Journal

Journal of Workplace LearningEmerald Publishing

Published: Mar 7, 2023

Keywords: Learning processes; Team learning; Workplace learning

There are no references for this article.