Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
U. Lichtenthaler, Eckhard Lichtenthaler (2009)
A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive CapacityWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Management Studies
H. Chesbrough, Adrienne Crowther (2006)
Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other IndustriesWiley-Blackwell: R&D Management
The Academy of Management Journal, 50
S. Zahra, G. George (2002)
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and ExtensionAcademy of Management Review, 27
Avimanyu Datta (2012)
IT-Based Knowledge Capability and Commercialization of Innovations: Modeling the Impacts of Ambidexterity and Absorptive CapacityDiffusion of Innovation eJournal
E. Whelan, Salvatore Parise, J. Valk, R. Aalbers (2011)
Creating Employee Networks That Deliver Open InnovationMIT Sloan Management Review, 53
Colin Cheng, Jashen Chen (2013)
Breakthrough innovation: the roles of dynamic innovation capabilities and open innovation activitiesJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28
Jong Jpj, W. Vanhaverbeke, Vrande Vja, Rochemont Mh (2009)
Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challengesSteel and Composite Structures
A. Salter, P. Criscuolo, Anne Wal (2014)
Coping with Open Innovation: Responding to the Challenges of External Engagement in R&DCalifornia Management Review, 56
B. Wernerfelt (1984)
A Resource-Based View of the FirmSouthern Medical Journal, 5
P. Herzog, J. Leker (2010)
Open and closed innovation - different innovation cultures for different strategiesInt. J. Technol. Manag., 52
H. Chesbrough, M. Appleyard (2007)
Open Innovation and StrategyCalifornia Management Review, 50
S. Durmusoglu (2004)
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from TechnologyEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 7
H. Chesbrough (2004)
Managing Open InnovationResearch-Technology Management, 47
L. Fleming, David Waguespack (2005)
Penguins, Camels, and Other Birds of a Feather: Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation CommunitiesIO: Productivity
U. Lichtenthaler (2011)
Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future DirectionsAcademy of Management Perspectives, 25
H. Chesbrough (2003)
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
Linus Dahlander, D. Gann (2010)
How open is innovationResearch Policy, 39
Advances in Strategic Management, 17
P. Pavlou, O. Sawy (2011)
Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities
D. Teece, G. Pisano, A. Shuen (1997)
DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENTStrategic Management Journal, 18
Wesley Cohen, Daniel Levinthal (1990)
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATIONAdministrative Science Quarterly, 35
H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, J. West (2014)
New frontiers in open innovation
Donna Rainone, Michael Rainone, Louise Musial (2014)
How to Work with Small Companies to Expand your Open Innovation Capabilities
T. Bruin, M. Rosemann (2007)
Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas
Fiona Schweitzer, O. Gassmann, Kurt Gaubinger (2011)
Open Innovation And Its Effectiveness To Embrace Turbulent EnvironmentsInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 15
H. Chesbrough (2010)
The Future of Open InnovationResearch-Technology Management, 60
J. Brocke, Alexander Simons, K. Riemer, Björn Niehaves, Ralf Plattfaut, A. Cleven (2015)
Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems ResearchCommun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 37
M. Grimaldi, I. Quinto, Pierluigi Rippa (2013)
Enabling Open Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises: A Dynamic Capabilities ApproachKnowledge and Process Management, 20
E. Whelan, K. Conboy, Kevin Crowston, L. Morgan, M. Rossi (2014)
Editorial: The Role of Information Systems in Enabling Open InnovationJ. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 15
Ellen Enkel, Sebastian Heil (2014)
Preparing for distant collaboration: Antecedents to potential absorptive capacity in cross-industry innovationTechnovation, 34
R. Kanter (2006)
Innovation: the classic traps.Harvard business review, 84 11
M. Rosemann, T. Bruin (2004)
Application of a Holistic Model for Determining BPM Maturity
M. Baqir, Y. Kathawala (2004)
Ba for knowledge cities: a futuristic technology modelJ. Knowl. Manag., 8
Stewart Witzeman, Gene Slowinski, R. Dirkx, L. Gollob, J. Tao, Susan Ward, S. Miraglia (2006)
Harnessing External Technology for InnovationResearch-Technology Management, 49
Ellen Enkel, John Bell, H. Hogenkamp (2011)
OPEN INNOVATION MATURITY FRAMEWORKInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 15
A. Dreiling, J. Recker (2013)
Towards a Theoretical Framework for Organizational Innovation
M. Rosemann, J. Brocke (2015)
The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management
Tina Saebi, N. Foss (2015)
Business models for open innovation: Matching heterogeneous open innovation strategies with business model dimensionsEuropean Management Journal, 33
E. Whelan, W. Golden, B. Donnellan (2013)
Digitising the R&D social network: revisiting the technological gatekeeperInformation Systems Journal, 23
M. Zollo, S. Winter (2002)
Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic CapabilitiesOrganization Science, 13
W. Vanhaverbeke, Myriam Cloodt (2014)
Theories of the firm and Open Innovation
(2006)
New Puzzles and New Findings
Fang-Chi Huang, John Rice (2009)
The role of absorptive capacity in facilitating "open innovation" outcomes: A study of Australian SMEs in the manufacturing sectorInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 13
J. Henkel (2006)
Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded LinuxResearch Policy, 35
J. Gammelgaard, Thomas Ritter (2005)
The knowledge retrieval matrix: codification and personification as separate strategiesJ. Knowl. Manag., 9
Organization Science, 18
M. Dodgson, D. Gann, A. Salter (2006)
The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & GambleR & D Management, 36
Ellen Enkel, O. Gassmann, H. Chesbrough (2009)
Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the PhenomenonNew Institutional Economics
B. Nooteboom, W. Vanhaverbeke, G. Duysters, V. Gilsing, Ad Oord (2005)
Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive CapacityPsychology of Innovation eJournal
Research Policy, 36
Keld Laursen, A. Salter (2006)
Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firmsSouthern Medical Journal, 27
Jay Carson, Paul Tesluk, J. Marrone (2007)
Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performanceIEEE Engineering Management Review, 44
Marcus Keupp, O. Gassmann (2009)
Determinants and Archetype Users of Open InnovationNew Institutional Economics
A. Spithoven, B. Clarysse, Mirjam Knockaert (2010)
Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industriesTechnovation, 30
Peter Lane, Balaji Koka, Seemantini Pathak (2006)
The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the ConstructAcademy of Management Review, 31
M. Wade, J. Hulland (2004)
Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future researchManagement Information Systems Quarterly, 28
Teppo Felin, Todd Zenger (2014)
Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choiceResearch Policy, 43
Sabine Brunswicker, Ulrich Hutschek, Lena Wagner (2012)
'Exploration' in the open innovation front–end: the role of technologiesInternational Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 8
K. Bader, Ellen Enkel (2014)
Understanding a firm's choice for openness: strategy as determinantInt. J. Technol. Manag., 66
G. Schuster, A. Brem (2015)
How to benefit from open innovation? An empirical investigation of open innovation, external partnerships and firm capabilities in the automotive industryInt. J. Technol. Manag., 69
K. Fichter (2009)
Innovation Communities: The Role of Networks of Promotors in Open InnovationWiley-Blackwell: R&D Management
Morten Hansen, N. Nohria, T. Tierney (1999)
What's your strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard business review, 77 2
Constance Helfat, Margaret Peteraf (2003)
The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecyclesStrategic Management Journal, 24
N. Rosenberg (1990)
Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)Research Policy, 19
B. Lawson, D. Samson (2001)
DEVELOPING INNOVATION CAPABILITY IN ORGANISATIONS: A DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES APPROACHInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 05
J. Barney (1991)
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive AdvantageJournal of Management, 17
Hagen Habicht, Kathrin Möslein, R. Reichwald (2012)
Open Innovation MaturityInt. J. Knowl. Based Organ., 2
Dirk Lüttgens, P. Pollok, David Antons, F. Piller (2014)
Wisdom of the crowd and capabilities of a few: internal success factors of crowdsourcing for innovationJournal of Business Economics, 84
J. West, M. Bogers (2013)
Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open InnovationIO: Productivity
V. Lazzarotti, R. Manzini (2009)
Different Modes of Open Innovation: A Theoretical Framework and an Empirical Study
Eva Forstner, N. Kamprath, Maximilian Röglinger (2014)
Capability development with process maturity models – Decision framework and economic analysisJournal of Decision Systems, 23
Tingru Cui, Yu Tong, H. Teo (2012)
Can Information Technology Bridge Knowledge Distance in Organizational Open Innovation? An Absorptive Capacity Perspective, 5
Jingshu Du, B. Leten, W. Vanhaverbeke (2014)
Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partnersResearch Policy, 43
Tingru Cui, H. Ye, H. Teo, Jizhen Li (2015)
Information technology and open innovation: A strategic alignment perspectiveInf. Manag., 52
E. Huizingh (2011)
Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectivesTechnovation, 31
H. Chesbrough, W. Haas (2006)
Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation
E. Chatenier, J. Verstegen, H. Biemans, M. Mulder, Onno Omta (2010)
Identification of Competencies for Professionals in Open Innovation TeamsERN: Innovation (Topic)
Colin Cheng, E. Huizingh (2014)
When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientationJournal of Product Innovation Management, 31
J. Webster, R. Watson (2002)
Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature ReviewMIS Q., 26
K. Joshi, Lei Chi, Avimanyu Datta, Shu Han (2010)
Changing the Competitive Landscape: Continuous Innovation Through IT-Enabled Knowledge CapabilitiesInf. Syst. Res., 21
S. March, Gerald Smith (1995)
Design and natural science research on information technologyDecis. Support Syst., 15
H. Chesbrough (2003)
The Era of Open InnovationMIT Sloan Management Review, 44
PurposeIn a world of ever-changing corporate environments and reduced product life cycles, most organizations cannot afford anymore to innovate on their own. Hence, they open their innovation processes to incorporate knowledge of external sources and to increase their innovation potential. As the shift toward open innovation (OI) is difficult and makes many initiatives fail, the question arises which capabilities organizations should develop to successfully implement OI. As the literature encompasses mature but isolated streams on OI capabilities, there is a need for an integrated capability framework. The paper aims to discuss these issues.Design/methodology/approachThis paper proposes the open innovation capability framework (OICF) that compiles and structures capabilities relevant for implementing OI. The OICF covers the outside-in and coupled processes of OI. To integrate multiple streams of the OI literature, the OICF builds on a structured literature review. The OICF was also validated in a two-step review process with OI experts from academia and industry.FindingsThe OICF comprises 23 capability areas grouped along the factors such as strategic alignment, governance, methods, information technology, people, and culture. To analyze the existing body of knowledge on OI capabilities, the authors compare the OICF with other OI-related capability frameworks and compile a heatmap based on the results of the literature review. The authors also discuss the experts’ feedback on individual factors of the OICF as well as on interdependencies among these factors.Practical implicationsThe OICF provides practitioners with a structured overview of the capabilities to consider when implementing OI. Based on the OICF, practitioners can define the scope of their OI initiatives. They can use the OICF as a foundation for prioritizing, selecting, and operationalizing capability areas as well as for deriving implementation roadmaps.Originality/valueThe OICF is the first framework to take a holistic perspective on OI capabilities. It integrates mature but isolated research streams of OI. It helps practitioners define the scope of OI initiatives and academics gain insights into the current state of the art on OI capabilities.
Business Process Management Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 3, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.