Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Well‐being for all as a human development objective Developing the concept and its criteria with citizens

Well‐being for all as a human development objective Developing the concept and its criteria with... Purpose – While defining the well‐being for all as the objective of human development, this paper aims to draw attention to the deficiencies resulting from the “simplification” inherent in its implementation, especially by institutions, and to the advantages to be derived from determining the concept's policy implications and the ensuing priorities and strategies via a bottom‐up‐ or grassroots‐approach. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses criteria from grassroots approaches to define well‐being for all. Findings – The approach to well‐being for all could help moving towards a new “political culture” rather than a new measurement. Practical implications – The analysis identifies the links between “components” of well‐being so that action does not continue to be blind, that is to say disregards the fact that, in a complex, changing world, it is necessary to identify the key areas and aspects that offer potential for a renewed organisation of responsibilities, in other words to achieve a new social compromise on the exercise of responsibility. Originality/value – Apart from fine‐tuning the definitions what interests us is how to transform a concept into a shared political priority for all concerned in a given context. The paper clarifies this, since a gulf can emerge between a concept's origins (strongly rooted in theories concerning human potential to reason in terms of the common good) and the methods of designating the powers capable of implementing it (for instance the choice may be narrowed down to government agencies and market players alone, disregarding citizens or civil society organisations and the need to engage in new forms of co‐responsibility). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Society and Business Review Emerald Publishing

Well‐being for all as a human development objective Developing the concept and its criteria with citizens

Society and Business Review , Volume 3 (2): 14 – Jun 20, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/well-being-for-all-as-a-human-development-objective-developing-the-wP5VjpewBp
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1746-5680
DOI
10.1108/17465680810880053
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – While defining the well‐being for all as the objective of human development, this paper aims to draw attention to the deficiencies resulting from the “simplification” inherent in its implementation, especially by institutions, and to the advantages to be derived from determining the concept's policy implications and the ensuing priorities and strategies via a bottom‐up‐ or grassroots‐approach. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses criteria from grassroots approaches to define well‐being for all. Findings – The approach to well‐being for all could help moving towards a new “political culture” rather than a new measurement. Practical implications – The analysis identifies the links between “components” of well‐being so that action does not continue to be blind, that is to say disregards the fact that, in a complex, changing world, it is necessary to identify the key areas and aspects that offer potential for a renewed organisation of responsibilities, in other words to achieve a new social compromise on the exercise of responsibility. Originality/value – Apart from fine‐tuning the definitions what interests us is how to transform a concept into a shared political priority for all concerned in a given context. The paper clarifies this, since a gulf can emerge between a concept's origins (strongly rooted in theories concerning human potential to reason in terms of the common good) and the methods of designating the powers capable of implementing it (for instance the choice may be narrowed down to government agencies and market players alone, disregarding citizens or civil society organisations and the need to engage in new forms of co‐responsibility).

Journal

Society and Business ReviewEmerald Publishing

Published: Jun 20, 2008

Keywords: Behaviour; Human nature; Psychology; Human resource development; Social anthropology

References