Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Weight bias in US candidate selection and election

Weight bias in US candidate selection and election Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to use data from the 2008 and 2012 US Senate elections to examine the relationship between candidate size (obese, overweight, normal weight) and candidate selection and election outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – Using pictures captured from candidate web sites, participants rated the size of candidates in the primary and general US Senate elections. χ 2 analyses, t ‐tests and hierarchical multiple regressions were used to test for evidence of bias against overweight and obese candidates and whether gender and election information moderate that relationship. Findings – Obese candidates were largely absent from the pool of candidates in both the primary and general elections. Overweight women, but not overweight men, were also underrepresented. Supporting our hypothesis that there is bias against overweight candidates, heavier candidates tended to receive lower vote share than their thinner counterparts, and the larger the size difference between the candidates, the larger the vote share discrepancy. The paper did not find a moderating effect for gender or high‐information high vs low‐information elections on the relationship between candidate size and vote share. Research limitations/implications – Further research is needed to understand the process by which obese candidates are culled from the candidate pool and the cognitions underlying the biases against overweight candidates. Social implications – Because of the bias against obese political candidates, as much as one‐third of the adult US population are likely to be excluded or being elected to a major political office. Originality value – This study is the first to use election data to examine whether bias based on size extends to the electoral process. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Weight bias in US candidate selection and election

Download PDF
13 pages

Loading next page...
1
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/weight-bias-in-us-candidate-selection-and-election-RyAF4WHo1d
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2040-7149
DOI
10.1108/EDI-10-2013-0081
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to use data from the 2008 and 2012 US Senate elections to examine the relationship between candidate size (obese, overweight, normal weight) and candidate selection and election outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – Using pictures captured from candidate web sites, participants rated the size of candidates in the primary and general US Senate elections. χ 2 analyses, t ‐tests and hierarchical multiple regressions were used to test for evidence of bias against overweight and obese candidates and whether gender and election information moderate that relationship. Findings – Obese candidates were largely absent from the pool of candidates in both the primary and general elections. Overweight women, but not overweight men, were also underrepresented. Supporting our hypothesis that there is bias against overweight candidates, heavier candidates tended to receive lower vote share than their thinner counterparts, and the larger the size difference between the candidates, the larger the vote share discrepancy. The paper did not find a moderating effect for gender or high‐information high vs low‐information elections on the relationship between candidate size and vote share. Research limitations/implications – Further research is needed to understand the process by which obese candidates are culled from the candidate pool and the cognitions underlying the biases against overweight candidates. Social implications – Because of the bias against obese political candidates, as much as one‐third of the adult US population are likely to be excluded or being elected to a major political office. Originality value – This study is the first to use election data to examine whether bias based on size extends to the electoral process.

Journal

Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 13, 2014

Keywords: Women; Discrimination; Career development; Equal opportunities

References

  • Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans
    Andreyeva, T.; Puhl, R.M.; Brownell, K.D.
  • Ballot photographs as cues in low‐information elections
    Banducci, S.A.; Karp, J.A.; Thrasher, M.; Rallings, C.
  • The wage effects of obesity: a longitudinal study
    Baum, C.L.; Ford, W.F.
  • The effects of a stated organizational policy on inconsistent disciplinary action based on salesperson gender and weight
    Bellizzi, J.A.; Hasty, R.W.
  • Stereotypical beliefs about overweight and smoking and decision‐making in assignments to sales territories
    Bellizzi, J.A.; Klassen, M.L.; Bellonax, J.J.
  • Implicit and explicit prejudice toward overweight and average‐weight men and women: testing their correspondence and relation to behavioral intentions
    Brochu, P.M.; Morrison, M.A.
  • Using conjoint analysis to detect discrimination: revealing covert preferences from overt choices
    Caruso, E.M.; Dobromir, A.R.; Mahzarin, R.B.
  • Appearance discrimination in employment
    Cavico, F.J.; Muffler, S.C.; Mujtaba, B.G.
  • Gender‐stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment
    Cejka, M.; Eagly, A.H.
  • Gender, obesity and education
    Crosnoe, R.
  • Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: a meta‐analytic investigation
    Davison, H.K.; Burke, M.J.
  • Voters vote beautiful: the effect of physical appearance on a national election
    Efron, M.G.; Patterson, E.W.J.
  • Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults
    Flegal, K.M.; Carroll, M.D.; Ogden, C.L; Johnson, C.L.
  • Perspectives on diversity as the gender and diversity in organizations division celebrates its 25th anniversary
    Fletcher, P.O.
  • Senility versus wisdom: the meaning of old age as a cause for behavior
    Green, S.K.
  • The portrayal of weight in the media and its social impact
    Greenberg, B.S.; Worrell, T.R.
  • Weight‐related words associated with figure silhouettes
    Greenleaf, C.; Starks, M.; Gomez, L.; Chambliss, H.; Martin, S.
  • Physical attractiveness and candidate evaluation: a model of correction
    Hart, W.; Ottati, V.C.; Krumdick, N.D.
  • The stigma of obesity: what about mean?
    Hebl, M.R.; Turchin, J.M.
  • Gender stereotype and the perception of male and female candidates
    Huddy, L.; Terkildson, N.
  • When it comes to pay, do the thin win? The effect of weight on pay for men and women
    Judge, T.A.; Cable, D.M.
  • Theories of stigma: limitations and needed directions
    King, E.B.; Hebl, M.R.; Heatherton, T.F.
  • The stigma of obesity in customer service. A mechanism for remediation and bottom‐line consequences of interpersonal discrimination
    King, E.B.; Shapiro, J.P.; Hebl, M.R.; Singletary, S.L.; Turner, S.
  • No fat persons need apply: experimental studies of the overweight stereotype and hiring preference
    Larkin, J.C.; Pines, H.A.
  • Looking like a winner: candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies
    Lawson, C.; Lenz, G.S.; Baker, A.; Myers, M.
  • Looking the part: television leads less informed citizens to vote based on candidates' appearance
    Lenz, G.S.; Lawson, C.
  • Weight discrimination: a multidisciplinary analysis
    Maranto, C.; Stenoien, A.F.
  • Predicting election outcomes from positive and negative trait assessments of candidate images
    Mattes, K.; Spezio, M.; Kim, H.; Todorov, A.; Adolphs, R.
  • An experimental study of the role of weight bias in candidate evaluation
    Miller, B.J.; Lundgren, J.D.
  • Beliefs and attitudes about obesity among teachers and school health care providers working with adolescents
    Neumark‐Sztainer, D.; Story, M.; Harris, T.
  • Bias, discrimination and obesity
    Puhl, R.M.; Brownell, K.D.
  • The stigma of obesity: a review and update
    Puhl, R.M.; Heuer, C.A.
  • Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children
    Puhl, R.M.; Latner, J.D.
  • Bases of political judgments. The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information
    Riggle, E.D.; Ottati, V.C.; Wyer, R.S.; Kuklinski, J.; Schwarz, N.
  • Weight‐based discrimination in employment: psychological and legal aspects
    Roehling, M.
  • Investigating the validity of stereotypes about overweight employees: the relationship between body weight and personality traits
    Roehling, M.; Roehling, P.V.; Odland, M.
  • The relationship between body weight and perceived weight‐related employment discrimination: the role of sex and race
    Roehling, M.; Roehling, P.V.; Pichler, S.
  • Weight discrimination and the glass ceiling effect among top US CEO’s
    Roehling, P.V.; Roehling, M.V.; Vandlen, J.D.; Blazek, J.; Guy, W.C.
  • The frog pond and beauty contest: physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine‐Westphalia state elections of 2005
    Rosar, U.; Kelin, M.; Beckers, T.
  • Candidate image and electoral preference in Britain
    Shephard, M.; Johns, R.
  • A bird of a different feather? An experimental investigation of physical attractiveness and the electability of female candidates
    Sigelman, L.; Sigelman, C.K.; Fowler, C.
  • A neural basis for the effect of candidate appearance of election outcomes
    Spezio, M.L.; Rangel, A.; Alvarez, R.M.; O'Doherty, J.P.; Mattes, K.; Todorov, A.; Kim, H.; Adolphs, R.
  • Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans
    Steele, C.M.; Aronson, J.
  • Weight‐based discrimination in occupational hiring and helping behavior
    Swami, V.V.; Chan, F.; Wong, V.; Furnham, A.; Tovée, M.I.
  • Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping
    Taylor, S.E.; Fiske, S.T.; Etcoff, N.L.; Ruderman, A.J.
  • Implicit anti‐fat bias among health professionals: is anyone immune?
    Teachman, B.A.; Brownell, K.D.
  • Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes
    Todorov, A.; Mandisodza, A.N.; Goren, A.; Hall, C.C.
  • The effects of the type and amount of information in sex discrimination research: a meta‐analysis
    Tosi, H.L.; Einbender, S.W.
  • Social identity and personal identity stereotype threat: the case of affirmative action
    Van Laar, C.; Levin, S.; Sinclair, S.
  • Age discrimination and working life: perspectives and contestations: a review of the contemporary literature
    Wood, G.; Wilkinson, A.; Harcourt, M.
  • The roles of motivation and ability in controlling the consequences of stereotype suppression
    Wyer, N.; Shermnan, J.W.; Stroessner, S.J.
  • Weight led Governor to surgery
    Zernike, K.; Santora, M.