Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Reicher, R. Spears, T. Postmes (1995)
A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation PhenomenaEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 6
R. Welch (1999)
How Can We Determine if the Sense of Presence Affects Task Performance?Presence, 8
P.G.S. Ferreira, E.P. Lima, S.E.G. da Costa
Perception of virtual team’s performance
V. Venkatesh, Fred Davis (2000)
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field StudiesManagement Science, 46
A. Adam (2004)
Information Systems Research, 143
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen (1977)
Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and ResearchContemporary Sociology, 6
A. Strauss (1987)
Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists
D.R. Rutter, G. Stephenson
The role of visual information in synchronizing conversation
S. Whittaker (2003)
Things to Talk About When Talking About ThingsHuman–Computer Interaction, 18
G. Hayward, C. Everett (1983)
Adaptors and innovators: Data from the Kirton Adaptor‐Innovator Inventory in a local authority settingJournal of occupational psychology, 56
Polycom Global Partners
Polycom High‐Definition (HD) Video Conferencing
Saonee Sarker, J. Valacich, Suprateek Sarker (2003)
Virtual Team Trust: Instrument Development and Validation in an IS Educational EnvironmentInf. Resour. Manag. J., 16
M. Kirton (1976)
Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure.Journal of Applied Psychology, 61
H. Weber
From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Gerth, H.H. and Mills, C.W. Eds, Trans.)
I. Ajzen
The theory of planned behavior
J. Lipnack, J. Stamps
Virtual teams
J. Carletta, A. Anderson, Rachel McEwan (2000)
The effects of multimedia communication technology on non-collocated teams: a case studyErgonomics, 43
R. Kleij, Jameela Lijkwan, P. Rasker, C. Dreu (2009)
Effects of time pressure and communication environment on team processes and outcomes in dyadic planningInt. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 67
B. Bergiel, Erich Bergiel, P. Balsmeier (2008)
Nature of virtual teams: a summary of their advantages and disadvantagesManagement Research News, 31
R. Mayer, J. Davis, F. Schoorman (1995)
An Integrative Model Of Organizational TrustAcademy of Management Review, 20
M. Argyle, M. Lalljee, M. Cook (1968)
The Effects of Visibility on Interaction in a DyadHuman Relations, 21
T. Palmeri (1999)
Theories of automaticity and the power law of practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25
R.C. Martella, R. Nelson, N.E. Marchand‐Martella
Research Methods: Learning to Become a Critical Research Consumer
Henryk Sienkiewicz
Quo Vadis
M.D. Gall, W.R. Borg, J.P. Ball
Educational Research: An Introduction
A. Dennis, J. George, L. Jessup, J. Nunamaker, D. Vogel (1988)
Information Technology to Support Electronic MeetingsMIS Q., 12
W.H. Whyte
The Organizational Man
A.B. Hollingshead, J.E. McGrath, Goldstein, I.L.
Computer assisted groups: a critical review of the empirical research
M. Deutsch (1958)
Trust and suspicionJournal of Conflict Resolution, 2
Hayward Andres (2002)
A comparison of face‐to‐face and virtual software development teamsTeam Performance Management, 8
S. Mohrman, S. Cohen, Allan Morhman (1995)
Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work
C. Robson
Real World Research
M. Gall, W. Borg, Joyce Gall (1996)
Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed.
O. Volkoff, Yolande Chan, E.F Newson (1999)
Leading the development and implementation of collaborative interorganizational systemsInf. Manag., 35
B.G. Glaser, A.L. Strauss
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Izak Benbasat, Henri Barki (2007)
Quo vadis TAM?J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 8
V. Venkatesh, Philip Johnson (2002)
TELECOMMUTING TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTATIONS: A WITHIN‐ AND BETWEEN‐SUBJECTS LONGITUDINAL FIELD STUDYPersonnel Psychology, 55
R. Fish, R. Kraut, Barbara Chalfonte (1990)
The VideoWindow system in informal communication
J. Olson, G. Olson, David Meader (1997)
Face-to-face group work compared to remote group work with and without video.
Kil-Soo Suh (1999)
Impact of communication medium on task performance and satisfaction: an examination of media-richness theoryInf. Manag., 35
John Short, Ederyn Williams, B. Christie (1976)
The social psychology of telecommunications
G. DeSanctis, R. Gallupe (1987)
A foundation for the study of group decision support systemsManagement Science, 33
J.V. Draper, D.B. Kaber, J.M. Usher
Telepresence: human factors
B. Douglass, C. Moustakas
Heuristic Inquiry: The Internal Search to Know
Fred Davis (1989)
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information TechnologyMIS Q., 13
J. Marques, C. Mccall (2005)
The Application of Interrater Reliability as a Solidification Instrument in a Phenomenological StudyThe Qualitative Report, 10
Paul Hart, C. Saunders (1997)
Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data InterchangeOrganization Science, 8
V. Venkatesh (2000)
Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance ModelInf. Syst. Res., 11
K. Knoll, S.L. Jarvenpaa, Igbaria, M., Tan, M.
Working together in global virtual teams
Q. Stafford‐Fraser
The Trojan coffee pot: A (non‐technical) biography
D. Rutter, G. Stephenson (1977)
The role of visual communication in synchronising conversationEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 7
M. Attaran, Sharmin Attaran (2002)
Collaborative computing technology: the hot new managing toolTeam Performance Management
T. Kuhn, David Hawkins (1963)
The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsAmerican Journal of Physics, 31
P.F. Drucker
Management’s new role
I. Ajzen, M. Fishbein
Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior
Hayward Andres (2006)
The Impact of Communication Medium on Virtual Team Group ProcessInf. Resour. Manag. J., 19
J.B. Walther, C. Slovacek, L.C. Tidwell
Is a picture worth a thousand words? photographic image in long‐term and short‐term computer mediated communication
A. Mowshowitz (1997)
Virtual organizationCommun. ACM, 40
R. Daft, R. Lengel (1983)
Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization DesignResearch in Organizational Behavior
M. Turoff, S. Hiltz (1982)
Computer Support for Group Versus Individual DecisionsIEEE Trans. Commun., 30
J.E. McGrath
Groups: Interaction and Performance
Joel Olson, Linda Olson (2012)
Virtual team trust: task, communication and sequenceTeam Performance Management, 18
J. Rotter (1980)
Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility.
H. Boeije (2002)
A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative InterviewsQuality and Quantity, 36
M.Q. Patton
Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods
Joel Olson, Linda Olson (2012)
Virtual Team Effectiveness And Sequence Of Conditions, 17
J. Walther (1996)
Computer-Mediated CommunicationCommunication Research, 23
L. Anselm, Strauss, Andrew Cerniglia (2008)
Excerpts from : The Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research
I. Zigurs, B. Buckland (1998)
A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems EffectivenessMIS Q., 22
B. Edwards
History of video calls: From fantasy to flops in facetime
J.B. Walther
Computer‐mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal
M. Credé, J. Sniezek (2002)
Group judgment processes and outcomes in video-conferencing vs. face-to-face groupsProceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
R. Kleij, R. Paashuis, J. Schraagen (2005)
On the passage of time: Temporal differences in video-mediated and face-to-face interactionInt. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 62
Joel Olson, Frank Appunn, Kimberly Walters, Lynn Grinnell, Chad McAllister (2012)
The Value Of Webcams For Virtual Teams, 16
A. Chapanis (1975)
Interactive human communicationComputer Supported Cooperative Work
A. Joinson (2001)
Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymityEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 31
V. Venkatesh, Hillol Bala (2008)
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on InterventionsDecis. Sci., 39
M. Sumner, D. Hostetler (2000)
A comparative study of computer conferencing and face-to-face communications in systems design
L. Mühlbach, Martin Böcker, A. Prussog (1995)
Telepresence in Videocommunications: A Study on Stereoscopy and Individual Eye ContactHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37
J. Rotter (1967)
A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust.Journal of personality, 35 4
S. Jarvenpaa, K. Knoll, D. Leidner (1998)
Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual TeamsJ. Manag. Inf. Syst., 14
Robert Jones, Rob Oyung, L. Pace (2005)
Working Virtually: Challenges of Virtual Teams
R.T. Keller, W.E. Holand
A cross‐validation study of the KAI Inventory in three research and development organizations
V. Venkatesh, Michael Morris, G. Davis, Fred Davis (2003)
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified ViewInstitutions & Transition Economics: Microeconomic Issues eJournal
C. Snow, S. Snell, S. Davison, D. Hambrick (1996)
Use transnational teams to globalize your companyOrganizational Dynamics, 24
J.R. Hackman
Groups That Work (and Those That Do Not): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork
D. Jonassen, Hyug Kwon (2001)
Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solvingEducational Technology Research and Development, 49
Krishna Prasad, K. Akhilesh (2002)
Global virtual teams: what impacts their design and performance?Team Performance Management, 8
M. Patton (1990)
Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed.
R. Spears, Martin Lea (1992)
Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication.
M.Y. Chutter
Overview of technology acceptance model: origins, developments and future directions
A. Noll (1992)
Anatomy of a failure: picturephone revisitedTelecommunications Policy, 16
J. Nunamaker, A. Dennis, J. Valacich, D. Vogel (1991)
Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gainManagement Science, 37
G. Foxall, A. Payne (1989)
Adaptors and Innovators in Organizations: A Cross-Cultural Study of the Cognitive Styles of Managerial Functions and SubfunctionsHuman Relations, 42
S. Jarvenpaa, D. Leidner (1999)
Communication and Trust in Global Virtual TeamsJ. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 3
Ederyn Williams (1977)
Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review.Psychological Bulletin, 84
Shirley Gilbert, D. Horenstein (1975)
THE COMMUNICATION OF SELF‐DISCLOSURE: LEVEL VERSUS VALENCE1Human Communication Research, 1
C.M. Charles, C.A. Mertler
Introduction to Educational Research
E. Williams
Experimental comparisons of face‐to‐face and mediated communication
G.P. Huber
A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making
P. Ha
All‐time 100 gadgets: Connectix QuickCam
P. Bosch-Sijtsema, R. Fruchter, M. Vartiainen, V. Ruohomäki (2011)
A Framework to Analyze Knowledge Work in Distributed TeamsGroup & Organization Management, 36
L. Cummings, P. Bromiley (1996)
The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation.
R. Bagozzi (2007)
The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm ShiftJ. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 8
J. Colquitt, J. Hollenbeck, Daniel Ilgen, Jeffrey LePine, L. Sheppard (2002)
Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: the moderating effect of openness to experience.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 2
A. Zaheer, Bill McEvily, V. Perrone (1998)
Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on PerformanceOrganization Science, 9
R. Keller, W. Holland (1978)
A Cross-Validation Study of the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory in Three Research and Development OrganizationsApplied Psychological Measurement, 2
G. Huber (1990)
A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence
M. Deutsch, Jones, M.
Cooperation and trust: some theoretical notes
Onne Janssen, Thea Vries, A. Cozijnsen (1998)
Voicing by Adapting and Innovating Employees: An Empirical Study on How Personality and Environment Interact to Affect Voice BehaviorHuman Relations, 51
M. Kirton (1980)
Adaptors and Innovators in OrganizationsHuman Relations, 33
M. Campion, E. Papper, Gina Medsker (1996)
RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSIONPersonnel Psychology, 49
R. Clapp, S. Ciantis (1989)
Adaptors and Innovators in Large Organizations: Does Cognitive Style Characterize Actual Behavior of Employees at Work? An Exploratory StudyPsychological Reports, 65
Jeremy Lurey, M. Raisinghani (2001)
An empirical study of best practices in virtual teamsInf. Manag., 38
P. Ferreira, E. Lima, S. Costa (2012)
Perception of virtual team’s performance: A multinational exerciseInternational Journal of Production Economics, 140
Purpose – The paper aims to address the question, “What is the impact of web‐based video via webcams on virtual team trust and effectiveness?” Change and evolution in team perceptions over time are described. The result is the creation of a theoretical model describing the effect of webcams on virtual team development. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative phenomenological heuristic case study was used to explore the individual expectations and experiences of the team members over a six‐week period. To strengthen reliability and validity, two qualitative methods, content analysis and constant comparative analysis — a means of grounded theory, were used to both test the historic basis of the existing literature on trust and effectiveness in virtual teams and to explore how the use of webcams influenced the work, interactions and effectiveness of a virtual team. Both qualitative methods involved different pairs of researchers using inter‐rater coefficients to address coding reliability and validity. Results from the two methods were then compared and contrasted. Findings – The resulting model highlights the importance of ongoing, formal differentiated training on new technology. This research also suggests careful management of technology change and its deployment to enhance outcomes of various organization forms. Research limitations/implications – Given the nature of the qualitative study, the findings are not generalizable, but may illumine the understanding of webcams and technology adaptation in similar virtual teams. Practical implications – The resulting model highlights the importance of ongoing, formal differentiated training on new technology. This research also suggests careful management of technology change and its deployment to enhance outcomes of various organization forms. The study incorporates Technology Acceptance Theory and applications of the Kirton Adaptation‐Innovation Inventory. Originality/value – With the increase in bandwidth on the Internet, technologies such as webcams have become more viable for use in virtual teams.
Team Performance Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 2014
Keywords: Management effectiveness; Qualitative research; Performance management; Organizational effectiveness; Virtual work; Team management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.