Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Voluntarism versus regulation Lessons from public disclosure of environmental performance information in Norwegian companies

Voluntarism versus regulation Lessons from public disclosure of environmental performance... Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the development of environmental disclosure during periods of voluntarism and during periods with changed statutory requirements. More specific, the question is how volume and content variety of environmental disclosure in financial statements are immediately affected by statutory regulations. Design/methodology/approach – In order to compare the effects of such regulations with the development in environmental disclosure during periods without any changes in statutory requirements, a longitudinal study is conducted to test five specific hypotheses. A quasi‐experiment with pre‐ and post‐testing of disclosure volume and content variety is carried out to test the effects of the statutory changes. Findings – The most important lesson from this paper is the significance of the voluntary approach to improve the variety of environmental disclosure. The present paper supports the claim of voluntarism that companies will meet the heterogeneous requirements of their stakeholders without any governmental regulations. No statutory regulations are needed to make the companies increase and adapt their environmental disclosure to the demand from their stakeholders and legitimate their existence towards society. The present paper has revealed that the regulation approach has a significant, immediate effect on mandatory environmental disclosure only, and that companies do not fully comply with such statutory regulations. Research limitations/implications – There is no universal notion of voluntarism. Different countries and societies have different legal requirements and political cultures regarding voluntarism. That is, voluntary reporting in Norway is affected by the national statutory requirements and may be underpinned by a certain set of societal responsibilities that may or may not exist elsewhere. Further research is needed to see whether these findings are readily generalized or whether they should only be interpreted in light of local considerations. Originality/value – This is the first comprehensive study of the development of environmental disclosure in Norwegian companies. A total of 822 financial statements and annual reports, during the period between 1987 and 2005, are analysed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change Emerald Publishing

Voluntarism versus regulation Lessons from public disclosure of environmental performance information in Norwegian companies

Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/voluntarism-versus-regulation-lessons-from-public-disclosure-of-5FVfpSPnPe
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1832-5912
DOI
10.1108/18325910910994685
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the development of environmental disclosure during periods of voluntarism and during periods with changed statutory requirements. More specific, the question is how volume and content variety of environmental disclosure in financial statements are immediately affected by statutory regulations. Design/methodology/approach – In order to compare the effects of such regulations with the development in environmental disclosure during periods without any changes in statutory requirements, a longitudinal study is conducted to test five specific hypotheses. A quasi‐experiment with pre‐ and post‐testing of disclosure volume and content variety is carried out to test the effects of the statutory changes. Findings – The most important lesson from this paper is the significance of the voluntary approach to improve the variety of environmental disclosure. The present paper supports the claim of voluntarism that companies will meet the heterogeneous requirements of their stakeholders without any governmental regulations. No statutory regulations are needed to make the companies increase and adapt their environmental disclosure to the demand from their stakeholders and legitimate their existence towards society. The present paper has revealed that the regulation approach has a significant, immediate effect on mandatory environmental disclosure only, and that companies do not fully comply with such statutory regulations. Research limitations/implications – There is no universal notion of voluntarism. Different countries and societies have different legal requirements and political cultures regarding voluntarism. That is, voluntary reporting in Norway is affected by the national statutory requirements and may be underpinned by a certain set of societal responsibilities that may or may not exist elsewhere. Further research is needed to see whether these findings are readily generalized or whether they should only be interpreted in light of local considerations. Originality/value – This is the first comprehensive study of the development of environmental disclosure in Norwegian companies. A total of 822 financial statements and annual reports, during the period between 1987 and 2005, are analysed.

Journal

Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 30, 2009

Keywords: Information disclosure; Environmental regulations; Annual reports; Regulation; Norway

References

  • The internet and change in corporate stakeholder engagement and communication strategies on social and environmental performance
    Adams, C.A.; Frost, G.R.
  • Corporate equal opportunities (non‐) disclosure
    Adams, C.A.; Coutts, A.; Harte, G.
  • Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: legitimating corporate behaviour?
    Adams, C.A.; Hill, W.‐Y.; Roberts, C.B.
  • A longitudinal and cross‐sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companies – a research note
    Campbell, D.
  • Voluntary social reporting in three FTSE sectors: a comment on perception and legitimacy
    Campbell, D.; Craven, B.; Shrives, P.
  • Quasi‐Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings
    Cook, T.D.; Campbell, D.T.
  • Compliance with mandatory environmental reporting in financial statements: the case of Spain (2001‐2003)
    Criado‐Jiménez, I.; Fernández‐Chulián, M.; Husillos‐Carqués, F.J.; Larrinaga‐González, C.
  • Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?
    Deegan, C.; Rankin, M.
  • Firms' disclosure reactions to major social incidents: Australian evidence
    Deegan, C.; Rankin, M.; Voght, P.
  • The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications
    Donaldson, T.; Preston, L.
  • Hitting the higher ground – the 1997 benchmark results
    Elkington, J.; Kreander, N.; Stibbard, H.
  • Social disclosure and the individual investor
    Epstein, M.J.; Freedman, M.
  • Miljørapportering i norske selskaper 1987‐2005. En empirisk undersøkelse av rapporteringspraksis i et innovasjonsteoretisk perspektiv
    Fallan, E.
  • A longitudinal and cross‐sectional analysis of volume and content of corporate environmental disclosure in Norwegian companies: a research note on innovativeness and adoption
    Fallan, E.; Fallan, L.
  • Methodological themes: constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies
    Gray, R.; Kouhy, R.; Lavers, S.
  • Annual reports … who reads them?
    Hutchins, H.R.
  • Environmental regulation and the competiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?
    Jaffe, A.B.; Peterson, S.R.; Portney, P.R.; Stavins, R.N.
  • Accountability and accounting regulation: the case of the Spanish environmental disclosure standard
    Larrinaga, C.; Carracasco, F.; Correa, C.; Llena, F.; Moneva, J.M.
  • Utveckling av miljöredovisning i svenska börsbolag – praxis, begrepp, orsaker
    Ljungdahl, F.
  • Setting its own standards and meeting those standards: voluntarism versus regulation in environmental reporting
    Maltby, J.
  • Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis
    Milne, M.J.; Adler, R.W.
  • Securing organizational legitimacy: an experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures
    Milne, M.J.; Patten, D.M.
  • Mandatory environmental disclosures in a legitimacy theory context
    Mobus, J.L.
  • Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports
    Nau, D.; Warsame, H.; Pedwell, K.
  • The objectivity of corporate environmental reporting: a study of Finnish listed firms' environmental disclosures
    Niskanen, J.; Nieminen, T.
  • Foreløpig Norsk Regnskaps Standard for Årsberetning
    Norsk Regnskaps Stiftelse
  • The legislation of environmental disclosures in three Nordic countries – a comparison
    Nyquist, S.
  • Environmental disclosures in the annual report: extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory
    O'Donovan, G.
  • Om lov om årsregnskap
    Ot. prp. nr. 42
  • Generelt om regulering av revisorer og revisjon
    Ot. prp. nr. 75
  • Intra‐industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory
    Patten, D.M.
  • The accuracy of financial report projections of future environmental capital expenditures: a research note
    Patten, D.M.
  • Green and competitive
    Porter, M.; van der Linde, C.
  • Toward a new conception of the environment – competitiveness relationship
    Porter, M.; van der Linde, C.
  • Disclosure strategies for pollution control
    Tietenberg, T.
  • Accounting for environmental protection measures
    United Nations Commission on Transnational Corporations
  • Environmental disclosures and public policy pressure
    Walden, W.D.; Schwartz, B.N.
  • Corporate environmental reporting: a test of legitimacy theory
    Wilmhurst, T.D.; Frost, G.R.