Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Mike Langenbach, Johannes Schmidt, J. Neumann, H. Zirngibl (2003)Delay in Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: Multifactorial Problem
World Journal of Surgery, 27
M. Sant, T. Aareleid, F. Berrino, M. Lasota, P. Carli, J. Faivre, P. Grosclaude, G. Hédelin, T. Matsuda, H. Møller, T. Möller, A. Verdecchia, R. Capocaccia, G. Gatta, A. Micheli, M. Santaquilani, P. Roazzi, D. Lisi (2003)EUROCARE-3: survival of cancer patients diagnosed 1990-94--results and commentary.
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 14 Suppl 5
I. Ihse (2003)The Volume-Outcome Relationship in Cancer Surgery: A Hard Sell
Annals of Surgery, 238
John Harmon, Daniel Tang, T. Gordon, H. Bowman, M. Choti, Howard Kaufman, Jeffrey Bender, Mark Duncan, T. Magnuson, K. Lillemoe, John Cameron (1999)Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection.
Annals of surgery, 230 3
Erik Elm, Douglas Altman, Matthias Egger, Stuart Pocock, Peter Gøtzsche, Jan Vandenbroucke (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85 11
A. Wibe, M. Eriksen, A. Syse, S. Tretli, H. Myrvold, O. Søreide (2005)Effect of hospital caseload on long‐term outcome after standardization of rectal cancer surgery at a national level
British Journal of Surgery, 92
Peter Murchie, Edwin Raja, D. Brewster, Neil Campbell, Lewis Ritchie, R. Robertson, Leslie Samuel, Nicola Gray, Amanda Lee (2014)Time from first presentation in primary care to treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer: effect on disease stage and survival
British Journal of Cancer, 111
J. Wise (2015)UK lags behind other countries on cancer survival but outperforms on low antibiotic prescribing, report finds
BMJ : British Medical Journal, 351
V. Allgar, R. Neal (2005)Delays in the diagnosis of six cancers: analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients: Cancer
British Journal of Cancer, 92
E. Kaplan, P. Meier (1958)Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53
J. Birkmeyer, A. Siewers, E. Finlayson, T. Stukel, F. Lucas, I. Batista, H. Welch, D. Wennberg (2002)Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States
The New England Journal of Medicine, 346
A. Hout, N. Wit, F. Rutten, P. Peeters (2011)Determinants of patient's and doctor's delay in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer
European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 23
A. Martling, B. Cedermark, H. Johansson, L. Rutqvist, T. Holm (2002)The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer
British Journal of Surgery, 89
S. Mayor (2012)One in four cases of bowel cancer in England are diagnosed only after emergency admission
BMJ : British Medical Journal, 345
Wei Zhang, J. Ayanian, A. Zaslavsky (2007)Patient characteristics and hospital quality for colorectal cancer surgery.
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 19 1
David Borowski, Seamus Kelly, D. Bradburn, R. Wilson, A. Gunn, A. Ratcliffe (2007)Impact of surgeon volume and specialization on short‐term outcomes in colorectal cancer surgery
British Journal of Surgery, 94
E. Hannan, M. Radzyner, D. Rubin, J. Dougherty, M. Brennan (2002)The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer.
Surgery, 131 1
S. Rogers, R. Wolf, A. Zaslavsky, W. Wright, J. Ayanian (2006)Relation of Surgeon and Hospital Volume to Processes and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Annals of Surgery, 244
Journal of the American Statistical Society, 53
British Medical Journal, 351
K. Billingsley, A. Morris, J. Dominitz, Barbara Matthews, S. Dobie, W. Barlow, George Wright, L. Baldwin (2007)Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship.
Archives of surgery, 142 1
D. Funch (1985)Diagnostic delay in symptomatic colorectal cancer
D. Cox (1972)Regression Models and Life-Tables
Journal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 34
The Cochrane Library, 174
Strobe Initiative (2008)The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61
David Borowski, D. Bradburn, S. Mills, B. Bharathan, R. Wilson, A. Ratcliffe, Seamus Kelly (2010)Volume–outcome analysis of colorectal cancer‐related outcomes
British Journal of Surgery, 97
C. Platell, D. Lim, Nazreen Tajudeen, Jinghong Tan, K. Wong (2003)Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer?
World journal of gastroenterology, 9 5
E. Mitchell, S. Macdonald, N. Campbell, D. Weller, U. Macleod (2007)Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review
British Journal of Cancer, 98
D. Farley, R. Ozminkowski (1992)Volume-Outcome Relationships and Inhospital Mortality: The Effect of Changes in Volume Over Time
Medical Care, 30
Oliver Peacock, S. Clayton, F. Atkinson, G. Tierney, J. Lund (2013)‘Be Clear on Cancer’: the impact of the UK National Bowel Cancer Awareness Campaign
Colorectal Disease, 15
E. Elm, D. Altman, M. Egger, S. Pocock, Peter G�tzsche, J. Vandenbroucke (2007)Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
BMJ : British Medical Journal, 335
J. Birkmeyer (2000)High-risk surgery--follow the crowd.
JAMA, 283 9
PurposeHigher caseloads are associated with better outcomes for many conditions treated in secondary and tertiary care settings, including colorectal cancer (CRC). There is little known whether such volume-outcome relationship exist in primary care settings. The purpose of this paper is to examine general practitioner (GP) CRC-specific caseload for possible associations with referral pathways, disease stage and CRC patients’ overall survival.Design/methodology/approachThe paper retrospectively analyses a prospectively maintained CRC database for 2009-2014 in a single district hospital providing bowel cancer screening and tertiary rectal cancer services.FindingsOf 1,145 CRC patients, 937 (81.8 per cent) were diagnosed as symptomatic cancers. In total, 210 GPs from 44 practices were stratified according to their CRC caseload over the study period into low volume (LV, 1-4); medium volume (MV, 5-7); and high volume (HV, 8-21 cases). Emergency presentation (LV: 49/287 (17.1 per cent); MV: 75/264 (28.4 per cent); HV: 105/386 (27.2 per cent); p=0.007) and advanced disease at presentation (LV: 84/287 (29.3 per cent); MV: 94/264 (35.6 per cent); HV: 144/386 (37.3 per cent); p=0.034) was more common amongst HV GPs. Three-year mortality risk was significantly higher for HV GPs (MV: (hazard ratio) HR 1.185 (confidence interval=0.897-1.566), p=0.231, and HV: HR 1.366 (CI=1.061-1.759), p=0.016), but adjustment for emergency presentation and advanced disease largely accounted for this difference. There was some evidence that HV GPs used elective cancer pathways less frequently (LV: 166/287 (57.8 per cent); MV: 130/264 (49.2 per cent); HV: 182/386 (47.2 per cent); p=0.007) and more selectively (CRC/referrals: LV: 166/2,743 (6.1 per cent); MV: 130/2,321 (5.6 per cent); HV: 182/2,508 (7.3 per cent); p=0.048).Originality/valueHigher GP CRC caseload in primary care may be associated with advanced disease and poorer survival; more work is required to determine the reasons and to develop targeted intervention at local level to improve elective referral rates.
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 12, 2017
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.