Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Hill (1982)
Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?" psychological bulletin
J.L Szumal
How to use group problem solving simulations to improve teamwork
J. McGrath (1984)
Groups: Interaction and Performance
R.A Cooke, J.C Lafferty
Group Styles Inventory
R.M McIntyre, E. Salas, B Morgan, A.S. Glickman
Team Research in the 80’s: Lessons Learned
L. Festinger, K. Back, S. Schachter, H. Kelley, J. Thibaut (1950)
Theory and experiment in social communication.
G.W Hill
Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one?
A. Townsend, S. DeMarie, Anthony Hendrickson (1998)
Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the futureAcademy of Management Perspectives, 12
S. Jarvenpaa, B. Ives (1994)
The Global Network Organization of the Future: Information Management Opportunities and ChallengesJ. Manag. Inf. Syst., 10
G. Piccoli (1999)
Assessing Managerial Impact in Virtual Teams: Possible Directions for Future Research
Wen-Huei Chen, C. Tang (1993)
A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail ProblemInf. Process. Lett., 47
N. Maier (1967)
Assets and liabilities in group problem solving: the need for an integrative function.Psychological review, 74 4
Mary Zalesny (1990)
Rater confidence and social influence in performance appraisalsJournal of Applied Psychology, 75
L. Hoffman (1979)
Applying Experimental Research on Group Problem Solving to OrganizationsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 15
Preston Bottger (1984)
Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceived influence in problem-solving groups.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69
S. Taggar, Rick Hackew, S. Saha (1999)
Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes.Personnel Psychology, 52
S.G Strauss, S.P Weisband, Wilson J.M
Human resource management practices in the networked organization: impacts of electronic communication systems
P.A Balthazard
Group Styles Inventory – Internet Edition
S. Weisband, L. Atwater (1999)
Evaluating self and others in electronic and face-to-face groups.Journal of Applied Psychology, 84
B. Burleson, Barbara Levine, Wendy Samter (1984)
DECISION‐MAKING PROCEDURE AND DECISION QUALITYHuman Communication Research, 10
N. Maier (1963)
Problem-solving discussions and conferences : leadership methods and skills
D. Duarte, N. Snyder (2000)
Mastering Virtual TeamsAcademy of Management Perspectives, 13
P.A Balthazard
Desert Survival Situation – Internet Edition
Jessica Lipnack, Jeffrey Stamps (1997)
Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology
J.R Hollenbeck, D.J Sego, D.R Ilgen, D. A Major, J Hedlund, J. Phillips
Team decision‐making under difficult conditions: construct validation of potential manipulations using the TIDE 2 simulation
P. Yetton, Preston Bottger (1982)
Individual versus group problem solving: An empirical test of a best-member strategyOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29
R. Cooke, J. Kernaghan (1987)
Estimating the Difference Between Group Versus Individual Performance on Problem-Solving TasksGroup & Organization Management, 12
T. Dickinson, R. Mcintyre (1997)
A Conceptual Framework for Teamwork Measurement
R. Cooke, Janet Szumal (1994)
The Impact of Group Interaction Styles on Problem-Solving EffectivenessThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30
Warren Watson, L. Michaelsen (1988)
Group Interaction Behaviors that Affect Group Performance on an I ntellective TaskGroup & Organization Management, 13
R. Libby, K. Trotman, I. Zimmer (1987)
Member Variation, Recognition of Expertise, and Group PerformanceJournal of Applied Psychology, 72
Richard Hackman, C. Morris (1975)
Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integrationAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8
B. Morgan, A. Glickman, E. Woodard, A. Blaiwes, E. Salas (1986)
Measurement of Team Behaviors in a Navy Environment
Virtual teams are typically made up of geographically dispersed experts, supported by computer-based communication technologies. Though increasingly popular this is still a relatively unstudied organizational form. Virtual team membership is typically based solely on needed expertise; the teams rarely have any history of interaction and their performance potential is unknown. Research shows that teams exhibit constructive, passive, and aggressive interaction styles, which have significant effects on the decisions the teams produce as well as the teams' satisfaction with those decisions. We present managerial tools for the assessment of conventional and virtual team interaction styles. We detail how the tools are used, and we also discuss how the styles manifest in each medium, and their effects. We give suggestions to team managers on how to use the insights the tools provide to manage their virtual teams for optimal performance.
Team Performance Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2000
Keywords: Teams; Communications technology; Decision making; Team leaders; Computer users
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.